mr mystery
Account closed by request
Posts: 5,798
Joined: Sep 2009
|
RE: Studio 66 in Breach x2 (A 2-4-1)!
It seems to me that Ofcom word things in such a way that covers if there isn't legally agreed definitions, it's this viewers being misled either "implicitly or explicitly" wording that they use, it seems to me that Ofcom could find a channel in breach for just wording things in a way that implies something is explicit that leads to a viewer being materially misled .
This is the same Ofcom that found the Asian babes channel in breach for giving the impression that the girls were naked when in fact they had flesh toned knickers on, Ofcom said something about that in their opinion this was done to mislead the viewers into thinking the girls were nude, so found them in breach even though they weren't naked and hadn't broken any rules concerning nudity .
Life is short . Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile .
(This post was last modified: 24-02-2013 01:19 by mr mystery.)
|
|
24-02-2013 01:18 |
|