Chat Girl TV Daytime - Discussion and Chat

Is it more the case that foot fetishists are just more likely to text in, or have clean texts that can be put on screen, as opposed to that everyone watching this channel is foot mad (or hopping mad, even )?

Some days it seems they should go the whole hog and rename it FootGirl TV

I love a lot about CG.
Hot Girls
Office set available
Nice with txts

BUT as a mobile user it's £42 for a 20 min call and that really limits how often I can ring in.

That said looking at Rochelle this morning it's hard to resist

Rochelle Hardy, fantastic. Great performer, doing very little but posing seductively.

(10-06-2012 11:22 )scapaflow Wrote:  Rochelle Hardy, fantastic. Great performer, doing very little but posing seductively.

I agree, she is so sexy.

Enjoyed seeing Kimberley & Kiki on screen together today.Can't help but think they'd go down well lezzing it us on a nightshow.

Given that it's such a foot-centric channel, how come Chatgirl has let go all the babes with decent length toes (Lauren Daley, Talia James, Samantha Alexandra, Demi, etc) and kept all the babes with short stubby toes (Kimberley notwithstanding)? It's like a channel that's known for boob-wobbling getting rid of all the generously bosomed babes and keeping those with flat chests! There'll be some foot guys out there who won't be bothered, but you'll find an awful lot like a set of toes that can be properly flexed and stretched and wiggled.

(10-06-2012 11:41 )naughtyboy Wrote:  

(10-06-2012 11:22 )scapaflow Wrote:  Rochelle Hardy, fantastic. Great performer, doing very little but posing seductively.

I agree, she is so sexy.

Rochelle has done well for herself, she couldn't quite establish herself on rlc but still has gone on to be the main players on chatgirl.

(19-06-2012 16:10 )Addison Wrote:  Given that it's such a foot-centric channel, how come Chatgirl has let go all the babes with decent length toes (Lauren Daley, Talia James, Samantha Alexandra, Demi, etc) and kept all the babes with short stubby toes (Kimberley notwithstanding)? It's like a channel that's known for boob-wobbling getting rid of all the generously bosomed babes and keeping those with flat chests! There'll be some foot guys out there who won't be bothered, but you'll find an awful lot like a set of toes that can be properly flexed and stretched and wiggled.

Probably something to do with the channel relocating down south and not really paying enough for the northern lasses to travel down.

A toes a toe to me ..lol sorry just can't remotely turned on by feet ...even most of the girls think its bizarre.

(19-06-2012 18:56 )docutech Wrote:  A toes a toe to me ..lol sorry just can't remotely turned on by feet ...even most of the girls think its bizarre.

I wasn't trying to find out who was turned on by feet, I was just pondering the disappearance of a type of anatomical particularity on this channel. Funny how so many feel the need to come out with the "I don't understand feet LOL" disclaimer after making reference to foot content. Amongst consenting adults in a tolerant universe, an anything is an anything, and any part of the body is equal to any other part, erotically or otherwise. No one worth your time will ultimately give a rat's ass what y'all aren't to; they'll be paying attention to what you are into! Babes who find it 'bizarre' will nine times out of ten be the ones who haven't received many, if any, compliments in that direction. And good luck with trying to explain to a visiting alien why the two swellings on a woman's chest are more logical/meaningful objects of desire than the two protuberances attached to the ends of her legs.

Sorry for the semi-rant, but it's a bit depressing that in 2012, when many here are trying to hold back what they see as the spread of Ofcom-ish conservatism, that we keep getting plonked back to square one in certain areas. Pack mentality isn't worth giving house-room to.

I dont usually watch this but who is the girl on channel 961 now