Tia Essex

(06-09-2023 10:40 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  

(26-04-2023 16:18 )CheekyKev Wrote:  

(26-04-2023 13:14 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  ^^ RBF is perfectly natural, more so than having a permanent smile, I'm sure if you called her Kev you'd put a smile on her face.
As a regular babeshow viewer I'm sure you're aware that most Daytime babes resemble statues. Best not to compare everyone else with Clara.

I have spoken to Tia several times.

I am not comparing her to Clara. But even the new girls give a lot more energy and avoid looking so completely disinterested and fed up most of the time like Tia does.

Despite your denial here, today you use the word contrast regarding Tia and Clara, a word often used in conjunction with compare.
I welcome an alternative viewpoint, but this is starting to get a bit vindictive, bordering on the obsessive. I can agree to some degree that Tia is less smiley than some, but in no way is she the only one, or the worst culprit, that is, if not smiling enough is a crime.
I'm watching Tia right now, & she's smiling happily. You do tend to conveniently miss these moments & choose to focus on the negative. I do wonder if at some point Tia has personally upset you, what started out as an observation has turned into something resembling an attack. Might I suggest that you watch other more smiley babes & let the rest of us appreciate the positives that Tia brings to the party like her great legs & tits. It's as if your happy to post that Tia looks miserable at every opportunity, why watch, move on. Or at least in the interest of fairness post about the countless other miserable looking babes.
Maybe Tia could be tapping into the void left by Mica Martinez, who had a similar persona, but still managed to forge a long career on the babeshows, & was very popular.

Your inferences are way off. I have spoken to Tia a few times and we have good banter on my Twitter. So try again Sherlock. Or maybe just stick to your own opinions and try not to break down others for psycho analysis....

^^
Oooooh

Keep up it's not called twitter anymore.

Don't know what you're on about, I was just exercising my right to reply to a post.

To everyone else, on this thread, by constantly highlighting how miserable someone looks gives a different impression to the one you portray.
Thanks for putting me straight. It's good that Tia has such a good sense of humour that being called miserable by you doesn't bother her. I'm pleased that I (wrongly) speculated that you may have had a tiff, it has at least served a purpose by you explaining everything away in the name of banter. It's hardly phycho analysis, you're way off & overacting. If you're going to constantly post about a babe looking miserable, but at the same time claim to be a fan, then expect to be questioned on a forum. it's what we do here, don't ever try to shut me, or anyone else down. If you can't cope with it then maybe stick to the site formerly known as Twitter, where all the bullies hang out. #Inferringnothing

(08-09-2023 08:45 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  ^^
Oooooh

Keep up it's not called twitter anymore.

Don't know what you're on about, I was just exercising my right to reply to a post.

To everyone else, on this thread, by constantly highlighting how miserable someone looks gives a different impression to the one you portray.
Thanks for putting me straight. It's good that Tia has such a good sense of humour that being called miserable by you doesn't bother her. I'm pleased that I (wrongly) speculated that you may have had a tiff, it has at least served a purpose by you explaining everything away in the name of banter. It's hardly phycho analysis, you're way off & overacting. If you're going to constantly post about a babe looking miserable, but at the same time claim to be a fan, then expect to be questioned on a forum. it's what we do here, don't ever try to shut me, or anyone else down. If you can't cope with it then maybe stick to the site formerly known as Twitter, where all the bullies hang out. #Inferringnothing

Wow, you are back pedalling so fast there, try not to fall over.

It is a bit rich to accuse me of bullying when it was you sir that made this personal, not me. I assume the forums are where we can give our opinions and feedback on the various babe show girls, which is what I was doing. You are the one that decided to make a ridiculous attempt to jump into my head and decided what it was that makes me tick or not.

As for contrasting Tia with Clara, it is a natural point of reference as we know that Clara is one of the most smiley, energetic girls on Xpanded daytime and Tia is probably the exact opposite. Again, to let you in on something you are unaware of, Tia herself joins in with this joke by calling Clara ADHD for example.

So next time, stick to discussing the girls and keep your assumptions to yourself.
Cheers.

^^ Read what you & I have posted more carefully, instead of making this into an attack by me. which it clearly isn't.
I said that X was a platform where bullying took place, not by you, if you want to make stuff up fine.
I was wrong, to guess that a fallout had occurred. I wrongly assumed, that because as you are self-confessed fan of Tia's yet almost every post you have made here was negative, which makes those posts out of context to everyone, apart from yourself, Tia & Clara who are all in on the joke, excluding all others who read it here.

I wont even go into back-pedaling, not really the case, I was reacting to the new information that you offered. I could accuse you of the same regarding the Clara comparison.

All this could have been avoided, as I've explained, I reacted to all your negative posts, if you're making negative posts on a forum for all to see expect a reply. It was unwise on your part, as it was part of a private joke, would've been better to have kept it private & avoid any misunderstanding.

Totally overboard on your part for accusing me of jumping into your head as you put it. Don't flatter yourself you're of no interest to me. I will continue to discuss with those who can be reasonable & not make it into something it isn't.

Smiley, Yes however interested, clearly not as she rarely leaves her phone alone whats with the granny bra

Its time to move on love!

(12-09-2023 07:28 )ANGELSTARQ Wrote:  Smiley, Yes however interested, clearly not as she rarely leaves her phone alone whats with the granny bra

Its time to move on love!

I know she’s not perfect. At least she doesn’t shy away from studio cam. She lies down at angle you can see a bit more than on the Tv. Lot of girls don’t like the studio cam from they way position themselves on the bed. Hannah Mac is the worse one. She should just leave.

(12-09-2023 07:28 )ANGELSTARQ Wrote:  Smiley, Yes however interested, clearly not as she rarely leaves her phone alone whats with the granny bra

Its time to move on love!

Exactly. It is the lack of effort that is unacceptable and yes she is constantly more interested in her phone than in doing her job.

(12-09-2023 07:42 )Zai47 Wrote:  

(12-09-2023 07:28 )ANGELSTARQ Wrote:  Smiley, Yes however interested, clearly not as she rarely leaves her phone alone whats with the granny bra

Its time to move on love!

I know she’s not perfect. At least she doesn’t shy away from studio cam. She lies down at angle you can see a bit more than on the Tv. Lot of girls don’t like the studio cam from they way position themselves on the bed. Hannah Mac is the worse one. She should just leave.

Tia is aweful, sorry but rarely on a call, her spoilt page is poor and always wears the same attire, her lack of effort is clear to see!

what is she wearing now its dredfull

(06-09-2023 10:40 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  

(26-04-2023 16:18 )CheekyKev Wrote:  

(26-04-2023 13:14 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  ^^ RBF is perfectly natural, more so than having a permanent smile, I'm sure if you called her Kev you'd put a smile on her face.
As a regular babeshow viewer I'm sure you're aware that most Daytime babes resemble statues. Best not to compare everyone else with Clara.

I have spoken to Tia several times.

I am not comparing her to Clara. But even the new girls give a lot more energy and avoid looking so completely disinterested and fed up most of the time like Tia does.

Despite your denial here, today you use the word contrast regarding Tia and Clara, a word often used in conjunction with compare.
I welcome an alternative viewpoint, but this is starting to get a bit vindictive, bordering on the obsessive. I can agree to some degree that Tia is less smiley than some, but in no way is she the only one, or the worst culprit, that is, if not smiling enough is a crime.
I'm watching Tia right now, & she's smiling happily. You do tend to conveniently miss these moments & choose to focus on the negative. I do wonder if at some point Tia has personally upset you, what started out as an observation has turned into something resembling an attack. Might I suggest that you watch other more smiley babes & let the rest of us appreciate the positives that Tia brings to the party like her great legs & tits. It's as if your happy to post that Tia looks miserable at every opportunity, why watch, move on. Or at least in the interest of fairness post about the countless other miserable looking babes.
Maybe Tia could be tapping into the void left by Mica Martinez, who had a similar persona, but still managed to forge a long career on the babeshows, & was very popular.

I normally agree with much you have to say but in this instance, I do not. Using inflamatory language like 'attack' & 'vindicative' is quite unfair to a user expressing an opinion and afterall this forum is very much about generating opinion and thought even if its has 'negative overtones'. What is clear, is your support for Tia and seems if I might be a little bold somewhat emotional but thats your opinion and you are most certaintly enitled to say that as much as Cheeky is with his thoughts. I do not believe he has broken any forum rules so lets express our thoughts freely shall we all in the interest of 'open debate'

(12-09-2023 11:26 )ANGELSTARQ Wrote:  

(06-09-2023 10:40 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  

(26-04-2023 16:18 )CheekyKev Wrote:  

(26-04-2023 13:14 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  ^^ RBF is perfectly natural, more so than having a permanent smile, I'm sure if you called her Kev you'd put a smile on her face.
As a regular babeshow viewer I'm sure you're aware that most Daytime babes resemble statues. Best not to compare everyone else with Clara.

I have spoken to Tia several times.

I am not comparing her to Clara. But even the new girls give a lot more energy and avoid looking so completely disinterested and fed up most of the time like Tia does.

Despite your denial here, today you use the word contrast regarding Tia and Clara, a word often used in conjunction with compare.
I welcome an alternative viewpoint, but this is starting to get a bit vindictive, bordering on the obsessive. I can agree to some degree that Tia is less smiley than some, but in no way is she the only one, or the worst culprit, that is, if not smiling enough is a crime.
I'm watching Tia right now, & she's smiling happily. You do tend to conveniently miss these moments & choose to focus on the negative. I do wonder if at some point Tia has personally upset you, what started out as an observation has turned into something resembling an attack. Might I suggest that you watch other more smiley babes & let the rest of us appreciate the positives that Tia brings to the party like her great legs & tits. It's as if your happy to post that Tia looks miserable at every opportunity, why watch, move on. Or at least in the interest of fairness post about the countless other miserable looking babes.
Maybe Tia could be tapping into the void left by Mica Martinez, who had a similar persona, but still managed to forge a long career on the babeshows, & was very popular.

I normally agree with much you have to say but in this instance, I do not. Using inflamatory language like 'attack' & 'vindicative' is quite unfair to a user expressing an opinion and afterall this forum is very much about generating opinion and thought even if its has 'negative overtones'. What is clear, is your support for Tia and seems if I might be a little bold somewhat emotional but thats your opinion and you are most certaintly enitled to say that as much as Cheeky is with his thoughts. I do not believe he has broken any forum rules so lets express our thoughts freely shall we all in the interest of 'open debate'

You could argue that constantly posting that someone is miserable is unfair. Not at all emotional, simply offering a balanced view.
I agree with most of what Kev has to say, and we have made our peace privately.