babestation harem

Click here to watch Babestation TV


Thread Closed 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 32 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The Freeview vs Sky content debate

Author Message
TheWatcher Offline
Ex Moderator
*****

Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
Post: #161
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
vila Wrote:
Josh Wrote:Camilla is by far the best girl on the show. She is the only one that pushes the boundaries.
I won’t disagree that she’s the best, at least she is pre-12am. She’s always been top for me since PG days, except when Anna was doing her stuff, but I don’t think she pushes the boundaries. Between 12am and 5am she often does exactly the reverse. I’ve seen her do a whole section hardly moving except for an occasional change of pose and without disturbing her clothing even for a nipple flash.
I dont think I've seen Camilla stationary like you describe. She moves about a lot and gets her top off more than most of the others. She's one of the best but I would not say that she pushes the boundaries more than everybody else.
10-07-2009 10:01
Find all posts by this user
Shandy Offline
.

Posts: 3,480
Joined: Jan 2009
Post: #162
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
vila Wrote:
Shandy Wrote:
vila Wrote:
TheWatcher Wrote:I am not optimistic about the show getting better in future.
I agree. At the beginning we were being told that we should be patient and things would soon loosen up but instead the show has got ever tamer.

well it took 4 months for party girls, and we're only 2 months in to babestation on sky, so shouldn't you wait til then before giving up hope? lol
As usual my point is ignored so I put it in bold red.

and as usual you ignored my point, PG took 4 months, yes you say Bs got tamer but were not at the 4 month mark so it could yet go the other way. THAT was my counter point to your point.
10-07-2009 12:07
Find all posts by this user
DrGrumpyPants Away
Account closed

Posts: 1,845
Joined: Jan 2009
Post: #163
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
i seriously thinking theres 2 versions of BS going around some cos seems to be 2 different versions that people are seeing maybe the forum is a bridge to a parrallel universe hehehe
10-07-2009 13:18
Find all posts by this user
TheWatcher Offline
Ex Moderator
*****

Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
Post: #164
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
I am pretty certain that PartyGirls started in September last year. I did not take a full interest in it until late October after watching Amanda. Smile
This is the oldest post on the forum to mention PartyGirls, from 9 Sep08.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...01#pid1901
The tits came fully out on 15Dec08 therefore it was really only 3 months later, not 4 months.
10-07-2009 17:40
Find all posts by this user
Shandy Offline
.

Posts: 3,480
Joined: Jan 2009
Post: #165
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
i got 4 months from whoever posted about it last, anyway its still longer than where we are with babestation at the moment.
10-07-2009 18:42
Find all posts by this user
TheWatcher Offline
Ex Moderator
*****

Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
Post: #166
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
Shandy Wrote:i got 4 months from whoever posted about it last, anyway its still longer than where we are with babestation at the moment.

Its not longer than where we are with Partyland though. That has been on for nearly 4 months which is longer than the PartyGirls "probationary" 3 month period and it is still nowhere near PartyGirl levels.
10-07-2009 21:46
Find all posts by this user
Shandy Offline
.

Posts: 3,480
Joined: Jan 2009
Post: #167
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
if i'm bein honest minded people shouldn't try to compare anything to party girls, its a different show with a different style, party girls, babestation, partyland and sex station are all cellcast programmes/channels and all individual, yes party girls had girls from babestation on it, but it was a seperate venture, its own individual identity. its like comparing different breeds of animals. you can only really judge babestation on freeview against babestation on sky and partyland on freeview and partyland on sky, thats the only TRUE and ACCURATE comparison.

party girls was a unique short term one off thing, no new channel will ever come near that, as has been said numerous times, party girls was way raunchier than babestation was, the overflow did spice up babestation on sky, but not to the same levels. you're putting party girls on an unreasonable pedestal.
10-07-2009 22:10
Find all posts by this user
vila Offline
Viewers' Champion
*****

Posts: 3,588
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 51
Post: #168
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
Shandy Wrote:and as usual you ignored my point, PG took 4 months, yes you say Bs got tamer but were not at the 4 month mark so it could yet go the other way. THAT was my counter point to your point.
No, you are STILL missing (or more likely deliberately ignoring) my point.

CH 33 has become TAMER.

PG did NOT become tamer after inception but got steadily BOLDER.
10-07-2009 23:56
Find all posts by this user
Sm© Away
すべてが言われて終わった後
*****

Posts: 34,985
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 689
Post: #169
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
[Image: boring-27b17cb862.jpg]
11-07-2009 00:18
Find all posts by this user
TheWatcher Offline
Ex Moderator
*****

Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
Post: #170
RE: The Freeview vs Sky content debate
Smc had closed this thread.
I have just reopenned it to post this definitive final comment.
I have just watched the Caty Cole/Karina video posted in the Partyland thread today.
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid175263
This was on the Sky Partyland show last night before the Freeview Partyland show started.
No further is comment needed.
Enjoy the video.
I have reclosed the thread.
11-07-2009 20:09
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 



Click here to watch Babestation TV