Anna Bailey - BS Nights Chat & Discussion

Yes there was a Mr P show last night - if you still call them Mr P shows that is.

There was a Mr P in the chat last night who (when asked) stated that the guy with Anna wasn't Mr P.

(07-03-2020 10:35 )woolleysheep Wrote:  Yes there was a Mr P show last night - if you still call them Mr P shows that is.

There was a Mr P in the chat last night who (when asked) stated that the guy with Anna wasn't Mr P.

Oh..any pics and vids, not seen anything on the show...

No pics or vids, as it was a blurred out show.

(07-03-2020 12:30 )elgar1uk Wrote:  No pics or vids, as it was a blurred out show.

beleive me it wouldnt be worth it, even in perv cam i fell asleep, terrible stuff

(07-03-2020 12:30 )elgar1uk Wrote:  No pics or vids, as it was a blurred out show.

A pointless show therefore. Why do it and bother at all if ?

(07-03-2020 15:51 )paytheman2000 Wrote:  

(07-03-2020 12:30 )elgar1uk Wrote:  No pics or vids, as it was a blurred out show.

A pointless show therefore. Why do it and bother at all if ?

Because chavs always get greedy when they think they've struck gold.

Innit

(07-03-2020 15:51 )paytheman2000 Wrote:  

(07-03-2020 12:30 )elgar1uk Wrote:  No pics or vids, as it was a blurred out show.

A pointless show therefore. Why do it and bother at all if ?

^ Because paying punters keep falling for it, thereby asking for repeats of a lesser service. BS have kidded a lot of guys that click on into either over estimating their expectations or underestimating the potential of a two camera show. It is recognising a disparity between what they actualy get and the latter that leads to proper customer disatisfaction. Unfortunately the shows have also deadened guys as to the true possibilities on the shows. Too many punters are too accepting of things being fudged/ blurred/ambiguous/tricked up because they think that is the way it will always be and they have no power to affect it. They are mislead. But hopefully wising up.

There was a goal up for unblurred, but nobody wanted it enough to tip for it.

^ i.e. It depends on what's being offered, where and how, for how long and for how much money. Some of this necessarily has to be taken on trust atm. The babe and operators have to cultivate that therefore. Because the punters don't trust them fta, they are getting less healthy interaction than they might be.

Thing is there should be a place for fta fulfilled goals and ones teased fta but done offscreen as long as all is communicated transparently in advance. Blur shouldn't be necessary; it just creates mistrust IMO.

Don't ever let anyone accuse you of underthinking things

First of all I'm not defending these shows. You couldn't pay me to go into perv for this stuff, but I have a look at times if there's not much happening elsewhere, because it's a talking point.

The goal was 2000 to unblur. Was that too much? Who knows because it will depend how many people they see are in the menu for that show. Jess, for instance, mentioned there were 70 people watching her show with Anna last night, at one point.

They can vary the blur on the webshows. Where they had it set on Friday was alot less than I've seen on other shows. So it wasn't that difficult to make a judgement on what was really going on.