Naked Question?

I personally don't care if they are completely naked all of the time, but a brief bit of full on nudity per show would be welcome. I'm not talking explicit stuff or crude stuff, but at least a good look at the goods, instead of them taking all of their clothes off, but covering the vagina. I know it sounds pervy, but I'm confused why it's against the rules to show a little vajay jay, when these girls are on at night, and on adult channels when the parents are able to block children from watching. I understand teasing us here and there so that we stay on longer and tune in more, but showing us the goods just once during each of their shows would be plenty, and wouldn't diminish the ratings.

That said, I'd be perfectly happy without a lot of nudity, since the girls are still great fun to watch in their current form, but perhaps some skimpier outfits would be a nice alternative to nudity. Instead of taking all of their clothes off and covering the front, maybe they could wear see through or partially see through outfits more, to give us the best of both worlds without having to fully expose themselves. It is nice to get an occasional look a their backsides though.

I don't know. The shows are still good, but sometimes it feels a bit same old same old. Some of the girls on Elite TV would be a nice addition the night shows, so that would be refreshing to see. Regardless of what changes or stays the same, I think that the wearing of three types of underwear/garments has to go. Sometimes I see a girl wearing a thong we can't see, with granny panties(Hate this word) on, plus another type of covering on top of that. If the reason for this is due to their monthly cycle, that's cool, but wearing all of that on any other occasion looks a bit silly

(06-01-2010 00:34 )mrmann Wrote:  I personally don't care if they are completely naked all of the time, but a brief bit of full on nudity per show would be welcome. I'm not talking explicit stuff or crude stuff, but at least a good look at the goods, instead of them taking all of their clothes off, but covering the vagina. I know it sounds pervy, but I'm confused why it's against the rules to show a little vajay jay, when these girls are on at night, and on adult channels when the parents are able to block children from watching. I understand teasing us here and there so that we stay on longer and tune in more, but showing us the goods just once during each of their shows would be plenty, and wouldn't diminish the ratings.

That said, I'd be perfectly happy without a lot of nudity, since the girls are still great fun to watch in their current form, but perhaps some skimpier outfits would be a nice alternative to nudity. Instead of taking all of their clothes off and covering the front, maybe they could wear see through or partially see through outfits more, to give us the best of both worlds without having to fully expose themselves. It is nice to get an occasional look a their backsides though.

I don't know. The shows are still good, but sometimes it feels a bit same old same old. Some of the girls on Elite TV would be a nice addition the night shows, so that would be refreshing to see. Regardless of what changes or stays the same, I think that the wearing of three types of underwear/garments has to go. Sometimes I see a girl wearing a thong we can't see, with granny panties(Hate this word) on, plus another type of covering on top of that. If the reason for this is due to their monthly cycle, that's cool, but wearing all of that on any other occasion looks a bit silly

Yeh what's even more estonishing is that you could flick over to a supposedly 'harmless' channel like Virgin, Bravo, Living and see full frontal nudity with the occasional shot of pussy lips.

Bloody the babe channels even show you a demo before 9pm of how to lock the channels. Also, it's weird how a few years ago there would be flash the gash and all that, but you would never see anything explicit on the terrestrial channels. Now there are so many rules on the babe channels, but on terrestrial tv they have show vaginal examinations, penetrative sex on channel 5. I know it gets away with it cos it's educational, but come on the babe channels have gone so far the other way it's laughable.

I agree with what you said about getting nake and then covering up. I would rather they just stay in their knickers cos there's more of a chance of a slip than there is when they've got a big sheet covering their bits. Oh and by the way, I think that we're all perverts.

(22-10-2009 16:24 )Tintin Wrote:  I was wondering if you guys could tell me what you find so attractive about the girls being nude on chat? Don’t get me wrong I love seeing the girls naked in the shower as it’s fucken hot but getting naked on the beds etc I don’t get because you can’t see anything plus the girls can’t turn or open their legs to camera without a blanket blocking the view, I think you get a better tease & a better view when the girls have their panties on.

Well lets hear what you guys think?

I have to say I agree, and that thinwhiteduke completely missed your point when he replied saying that he doesn't mind the girls showing their knickers, but that he'd prefer it if they were between their teeth at the time.

Elite's version of the 'naked' trick is the worse. As soon as I see that bloody silk blanket draped between the girls' legs I switch over. What's the point? Like you, Tintin, until these girls can get naked and show us everything, I'd rather they keep their knickers on and continue with those lovely open-legged crotch shots.

it does annoy me a bit with the sheet issue especially as the bs babes when the go naked most of the time dont use it and position themselves so you cant see anything too revealing

Just wondering but have people not been watching? There are more flashes in 3 days of the girls just being covered by a sheet than there have been in 3 years of them wearing knickers. More chance of a flash when they're wearing knickers indeed.

Jesus wept, it comes to something when people are saying they'd rather them keep their knickers on. And for people who say they just switch over when they get naked, what to? Dirty Talk or something?

I just hope the people at Elite don't take too much notice of this forum!!

(05-01-2010 14:23 )Tintin Wrote:  

(05-01-2010 13:29 )mikedafc Wrote:  if they have knickers on there is no chance of a slip. I love seeing the girls naked because you never know what might happen!!

(if they have knickers on there is no chance of a slip) lol look through Bluearmy71, Skateguy's & my uploads & then say that lol

Fact is, you don't like it because it takes away the interminably dull ass to camera for 10 minutes at a time routines.

They may be naked but they are "safe" naked and I don't see the point of that.

(06-01-2010 12:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  it does annoy me a bit with the sheet issue especially as the bs babes when the go naked most of the time dont use it and position themselves so you cant see anything too revealing

I don't get it at all!

On Babestation we have Camilla naked in the doggy position clearly thrusting her pussy to the rear over & over again, then Sportxxx girl Serena/Hazel whatever she calls herself says they were told to stop removing their knickers or revealing their pubes.

There must be so much bullshit in the OFCOM rules that 3 people looking at them would end up with 3 different opinions on what can be shown and what can't.

Whatever became of all the porn we were going to be flooded with when the year 2000 came in according to the press from Europe at the time?

No wonder teenage girls & lads are so messed up going round screwing just for a laugh and to show they are "grown up" to us over 18's who still aren't old enough to see a fanny according to the regulators.

I can guarantee that OFCOM is completely staffed by over 60's who only ever had sex with the light's off and a pair of tights on just to make sure the old man don't see to much.

BASTARDS!

(06-01-2010 14:14 )MARCCE Wrote:  Fact is, you don't like it because it takes away the interminably dull ass to camera for 10 minutes at a time routines.

WooW did you think of that all by your self?

As for the 10 minutes at a time routines don't make me laugh cause the girls are more nude on the show than they are wearing panties....

(06-01-2010 15:24 )Tintin Wrote:  

(06-01-2010 14:14 )MARCCE Wrote:  Fact is, you don't like it because it takes away the interminably dull ass to camera for 10 minutes at a time routines.

WooW did you think of that all by your self?

As for the 10 minutes at a time routines don't make me laugh cause the girls are more nude on the show than they are wearing panties....

Yes, that's the way it is now, though it has to be said they're not always nude. Alexa doesn't do it at all, Delta doesn't always do it, Gemma doesn't always....the list goes on.

What you want is to have all the girls primed and ready to leap up and thrust their arses at the camera on command. Never mind the fact that you get that on just about every other channel bar the times when Elite and Babestation do go naked. And never mind the fact that half the time they're in that position, they'll be examining their nails, playing with their hair, reading the paper or writing out the following day's shopping list, you seem to want that to the exclusion of anything else. You objected to the girls standing up for the same reason.

All I'll say is that since they started going naked, there's been some of the hottest stuff I've seen on these channels since the days of Babestar.

For certain people to then say, "stop, we want you to go back to doing exactly what all the other channels are doing" kind of mystifies me.

And maybe if you could think of another position all by yourself, you'd get a bit more enjoyment and learn to embrace a bit more variety from the channels.