Does Bang Babes Need A Better Webstream?

(24-10-2010 19:37 )Rise Wrote:  TvX is worse. By the way, surely options 2 and 3 are the same!?!?

No not really cause i was thinking, Option 2 as a Definite NO & Option 3 was Naa i think it's ok the way it is.

Would 1 of the mods plz edit option 2 so that it say's Definitely Not

Thank you & Sorry for confgusing you

To be honest if the site had an option to pay for HQ streaming i wouldn't mind paying a few £ for it.

Wouldn't you guys or would you's rather have the free bad qualty streaming?

(25-10-2010 11:59 )Tintin Wrote:  

(24-10-2010 19:37 )Rise Wrote:  TvX is worse. By the way, surely options 2 and 3 are the same!?!?

No not really cause i was thinking, Option 2 as a Definite NO & Option 3 was Naa i think it's ok the way it is.

Would 1 of the mods plz edit option to so that it say's Definitely Not

Thank you & Sorry for confgusing you

It didn't confuse me, it simply meant the 'don't need to change it' vote was split and the results were therefore going to look unduly weighted in favour of changing it, imo. e.g The split is currently 20/2/3 when a clearer summary would be 20/5

The webstream as it is has its issues, the pixellation being the only one that bothers me, but it is very reliable. It is also relatively unhindered by promotional crap and the interface (for choosing girls) beats all the other stations. Elite's webstream is clearer but comparatively inconsistent, and Babestation's is an absolute joke considering it is meant to be the industry standard channel.

However, as for spending a few quid a month for a 'real McCoy' TeaseMeTv webstream I would absolutely join you in doing that!

(25-10-2010 12:25 )Rise Wrote:  Babestation's is an absolute joke considering it is meant to be the industry standard channel.

SO IS THERE TV CHANNELS

(25-10-2010 12:25 )Rise Wrote:  

(25-10-2010 11:59 )Tintin Wrote:  

(24-10-2010 19:37 )Rise Wrote:  By the way, surely options 2 and 3 are the same!?!?

No not really cause i was thinking, Option 2 as a Definite NO & Option 3 was Naa i think it's ok the way it is.

Would 1 of the mods plz edit option to so that it say's Definitely Not

It didn't confuse me, it simply meant the 'don't need to change it' vote was split and the results were therefore going to look unduly weighted in favour of changing it, imo. e.g The split is currently 20/2/3 when a clearer summary would be 20/5

The 2nd & 3rd options (which did seem to be essentially the same) have been merged.

Where is the option if you don't care about the webstream as we watch Bangbabes on Sky.
You can call it the smug bastards option

I have sky+ & I still use the webstream. Does any 1 else do that?

my concern about the site, is not about the webstream, that is ok to me, but about the subscribers part...

Please, add a pagination when searching a girl on the "girls" section. For sure (i work with web) you must have a database to store the videos. then, is easy to add all videos related to a girl, and build a pagination to navigate. It is not at all user friendly to see a set of videos, and then after a week or so another set, and the previous one disappear..... I know you have other things in mind at the moment, but a better site would mean also more income. the eliteTV website is well done, for instance...

keep up the good work!

They should enhance a little bit the quality