Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?

Author Message
rickhardo Offline
Evening!
*****

Posts: 6,459
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 125
Post: #11
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
If you can't actually see anything anyway I think a nice pair of knickers is far more attractive than an unsightly blur.

I don't know where you magic pixies came from, but I like your pixie drink!
16-10-2011 10:45
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Scottishbloke Away
Banned

Posts: 8,304
Joined: Jan 2010
Post: #12
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
(16-10-2011 10:25 )mikedafc Wrote:  No, have you never seen Japanese porn? it is terrible because they blur the private parts!!

Funny you should say that, about 11 years ago when I went on a trip to New Zealand with a large party of people we travelled by Japan Airlines, but to cut a long story short on the way back we stayed at a hotel in Tokyo nearby the airport for our flight back to the UK and somebody pressed the red button in the hotel room for what he thought would be hard core porno and yes it was, but only problem was all the private parts were indeed blurred, he had the embarrassment the following morning of having to foot the bill. True story this, I was there pissing myself laughing at his expense. No no blurring to me would be an even bigger step back than we have at present.
(This post was last modified: 16-10-2011 15:52 by Scottishbloke.)
16-10-2011 14:09
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
elgar1uk Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 2,404
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 77
Post: #13
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
(15-10-2011 21:28 )mrmann Wrote:  so would it work for the babe channels?

It's probably just me that's a silly old fool, but how does blurring things out (pixellating) enable you to see them?
16-10-2011 16:07
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HoneyRocks Offline
Honey Monster
*****

Posts: 2,007
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 46
Post: #14
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
But if you blurred/pixilated the private parts on the tv feed only but showed in the clear on the webstream, could Ofcom do anything about the webstream being in the clear?

The wouldn't like it of course, but I guess as long as there was no touching, actual masterbation or simulation and the private parts sufficiently blurred there wouldn't be a problem.

Sexcetera and Sin Cities still regularly get shown on ordinary channels lower down with only blurring or less and never seem to have any complaints?

I really don't care what anyone else thinks!!! Lovely beautiful Honey Scott IS my favourite very cute bundle of yummy Marshmallow Fluff!!! <3
16-10-2011 17:44
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chimpy Offline
Damn Dirty Ape!
*****

Posts: 1,546
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation: 74
Post: #15
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
Did anyone spare a thought for the people who have OCD about cleaning? If they see a blur on the babe channels they may think its a smudge on the screen and then spend all night rubbing the screen off and not themselves....

And now he's home... and we're laughing...like we always did...
(This post was last modified: 16-10-2011 17:57 by Chimpy.)
16-10-2011 17:56
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rickhardo Offline
Evening!
*****

Posts: 6,459
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 125
Post: #16
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
I think Damon Albarn and his indie chums are probably too busy to stand about blocking glamour models naughty bits.

I don't know where you magic pixies came from, but I like your pixie drink!
16-10-2011 18:03
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
terence Offline
Moderator
*******

Posts: 10,951
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 214
Post: #17
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
(16-10-2011 10:25 )mikedafc Wrote:  No, have you never seen Japanese porn? it is terrible because they blur the private parts!!

thank you Douglas MacArthur for that!Big Grin

Chuck Norris has tested positive for coronavirus (COVID-19). the virus is now in quarantine for 14 days.
16-10-2011 18:19
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
eccles Offline
custodes qui custodiet
*****

Posts: 3,032
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 69
Post: #18
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
(16-10-2011 10:25 )mikedafc Wrote:  No, have you never seen Japanese porn? it is terrible because they blur the private parts!!

I thought they only blurred pubes.

The rumour is that they make up for it by showing cum shots, bathroom, public fucking, group, squid and general weirdness. Or is that the Germans?

Gone fishing
17-10-2011 00:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SCIROCCO Offline
Banned

Posts: 759
Joined: Dec 2009
Post: #19
RE: Should The Channels Blur Private Parts So We Can See More?
Please no. That would be a disaster, a victory for the censors and the last time I watched any channels.
17-10-2011 14:28
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply