Babestation Cams - Schedule/Promo Thread

yes mate i agree but £3 a minute is a bit steep for 2 girls that put on relatively tame shows via a cam site that deliberately drops the picture quality...
i logged on at just after 9 when they did the setup it was x2 the quality with very little in the way of blocking.
they booted every 1 after a few mins. then when i went back the pic quality had been halved and way blocky when the girls moved (although a lot better than last time it was still very poor)...
they had 40 guys in the free chat at 11:30. as soon as they went ppv that dropped to 5.
40 guys paying 50p a minute must be better than 5 playing £3pm.
plus the cheaper the inital fee the more chance the guys stay and hopefully tip.
but hey its there business. they can run it they way they want... but at the end of the day its us paying for it and if we vote with out wallets they loose out.

I noticed the massive drop in quality too, so just left and didn't bother going into VIP or anything. I'm sure I'm not the only one who did so either.

I can't believe how bad BS' business plan is...such a poorly run company.

Wonder why they keep putting Lori Buckby into the schedul when she isn't gonna be online. Think this is the 7th time she been scheduled to be online.
The other 6 times she didnt show up. Or maybe she didnt know about it and they just use her to make people "top-up" and be ready for her to NOT get online.... LOL

(17-12-2014 13:04 )MetroMax Wrote:  Wonder why they keep putting Lori Buckby into the schedul when she isn't gonna be online. Think this is the 7th time she been scheduled to be online.
The other 6 times she didnt show up. Or maybe she didnt know about it and they just use her to make people "top-up" and be ready for her to NOT get online.... LOL

Lori's normal webcam shows are a joke (a waste of time & money) Her pervcam shows are 10000 times hotter! Well they were when she was at the old studio

(17-12-2014 14:16 )SirAssAlot Wrote:  Lori's normal webcam shows are a joke (a waste of time & money) Her pervcam shows are 10000 times hotter! Well they were when she was at the old studio

Well, the pervcam is history thx to oldboy and all the other wankers who recorded complete shows and posted them on tubesites. Fucking twats.

Maybe 30% chance that all these will show up as scheduled. Either way it's a big FAIL..

is that a FAIL in there no shows or there shows were dire?
i tried to watch flick and kat last night. it 2 was an epic fail.
they used the naughty chat cam which i know works well, but yet again when it came to using it for there webcam show it all of a sudden couldnt play more than 2fps with massive lag stutters... 40 credits a minute or 1.50pm on rampant. pure pisstake...
the worst part is they then showed the girls on bsx and you saw more than you did on there cam show.

bscams? more like BS SCAMS!.

Price VS Performance = Fail

98% of the girl/girl shows are FAIL.
One of the main reasons for this is girls like Ashley. A girl that is a total FAIL on webcam. I know she's not the sharpest knife in the drawer but WTF.....

Another reason is the "lies" that the girls do on webcam. They request "tip" to perform but don't follow up after they gotten the credit from customers.
Could give you X numbers of other reasons but most people here know how the girls operates to scam their customers.

The G/G shows are always put on babestationcams.com & Rampant which ends up with the BS Cam site stream really slow.

If they want to put a webcam show on 2 sites they should use 2 webcams (laptops) that way ever 1s happy but oh know who ever decides to share a webcam stream with 2 parties must have Shit 4 brains cause they damn well know it fucks up the stream quality & the speed...

thats not the issue mate. they use the same cam setup for naughty chat in the afternoon and that is transmitted to babestation and rampant perfectly fine.
its also better quality, higher fps, higher rez and at a higher bitrate which is reduced for the cam shows, so in theory the cam should be smoother as there broadcasting less data. (in theory)
the last time they did this they changed the cam aspect ration from 800/480 to 500/1150 this doubled the amount of data being sent to the encoder but the encoder was still broadcasting at 650kbps. end result the encoder had to work x2 as hard on compressing the stream so produced a way worse image for broadcast.
i know this is all technical and shit. but there basically trying to put 2lbs of sugar in a 1lb bag and expecting it not to spill over.