Would you be more likely to phone the shows if they showed pussy?

ive been watching the shows for 7 years and i voted no because im not more likely to call a girl just cause shes showing all i call a girl because i like the way she moves the way she dresses and about the way she is more

I must admit I'm quite surprised that so many of you don't seem to be all that keen on seeing a pussy show. The days of Babestar TV back in 2006 were legendary. I wouldn't expect all the girls to show all, it would entirely be their choice but wouldn't it be great knowing that certain girls that night would be wlling to show all. There is a market for it, hence the reason most of the European shows allow it. Also it would give the shows a hell of lot more freedom.

Now ofcourse when I made this post it was fairly obvious to most that current ofcom rules don't allow for this but if they were challenged or the rules changed tommorow then who know's, that's why I thought it might be important to get viewer and caller feedback.

Well i voted yes and gave BS Xtreme as a example of a show i do ring , but i think SB is talking about would you be more likely to ring the regular channels if full frontal nudity was allowed on regular channels and not talking about encrypted channels showing full frontal nudity , anyway i give this as a example say STD 66 and RLC who both have four channels had two channels that the rules allowed them to show full frontal nudity and 2 that didn't , i would be much more likely to to ring the girls on the channels that they could show their pussy's on than the same girls when they were on the channel that they couldn't, a girl being allowed to show her pussy if asked by her caller doesn't mean she can't wear nice outfits, dress sexily, do role play scenarios etc, she could dress as a knickerless College girl/secretary, cow girl etc .
A girl being allowed to show her pussy doesn't necessarily mean only hard core porn stars would work on the channels, or that they would not be allowed to wear nice clothes.
Channel employees that worked on channels that pussy's were allowed to be shown would be much more relaxed, you wouldn't get nervous cameramen/producers/girls scared of slips and spoiling the visual side of the phone call with their nervousness .
IMO a channel that allowed their girls to show full frontal nudity if asked by their caller would be a overall better show in all departments , so would encourage me to call more than calling the channels as they are now were everyone is scared of slips and can ruin the visual side of things .

The girls that I like are not the type to show pussy anyway,also a girl laying there legs open, showing everything does nothing for me,in fact find it a bit of a turn off,but if a girl is doing a great tease show and is prepared to push things further and give a flash,or wear see through panties like some of the shows gone past then thats a different matter,so I voted yes.

the question said would you and i wouldnt like i said wouldnt be not in favour in girls going full frontal just wouldnt make me wanna call a girl just because she was.

like i said wouldnt mind either way like it was in 2010. Variety is a good thing thats the problem now same girls being on the channels all the time theres some good talent out there the channels just are not using it to their full potential

(20-09-2012 16:12 )dogman Wrote:  [...] also a girl laying there legs open, showing everything does nothing for me,in fact find it a bit of a turn off [...]

So how the hell do you ever get around to the act of sex itself?? Put on a blindfold?

(20-09-2012 01:11 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  All opinions are welcomed, for the record I'd be far more likely to pick the phone up more often if I could see the shows in the manner in which they were probably designed for in the first place.

Interesting that you've assumed that the shows set out to show pussy.Apart from the odd exception already mentioned, I'm not sure that has ever been the case.In the beginning we had shows ranging in content & less of them.They have evolved over time into, in some cases a much more professional money making machine with revenue coming from a multitude of sources.At present,despite an economic recession calls are coming in.So are you infact asking a loaded question, "why the fuck are idiots still calling when the shows are shit with no pussy ?" Don't forget people still call the dayshows with no tits,unless there's a slip & no dirty talk,only inuendo.Back to the nightshows,where do you stop.Some would be happy with just pussy,others would want more g/g interaction or toys,b/g & so on (I'll stop before I get into trouble). In summation this is just another, why don't Ofcom fuck off & let us have the Adult entertainment we choose,thread in disguise. Oh,& erm..think I'd call a bit more with pussy.

No I'd never call these shows anyway because I'm not into phone sex. I'd be more likely to watch more often if they showed their pussy.

Not at all. How naked the girl is doesn't matter to me half as much as the conversation and general demeanour of the girl. There are girls who can be infinitely sexy with all their clothes on, camera close up on their face and just talking. Then there are other girls who could be fully naked, doing every filthy thing you want to see and still not be as sexy.

I like simulated blowjobs etc. so would rather they had a bit more freedom to that kind of thing, or even more POV stuff, rather than be able to get more naked.

That will be a yes from me.