UEFA European Championship 2021

(12-07-2021 11:42 )SecretAgent Wrote:  The penalty takers were decided by Southgate not Sterling! He will have based it on the penalty practice they had been doing in training and each of those players stepped up so lets not blame them or Sterling please

by all accounts Sterling was asked to take one and said no, thats something one of the main players in the side should not have done, i have nothing but respect for Saka for stepping up when those who should have did not, no way he should have had the shit he did on twitter, i still think Southgate should have been more forceful in who he wanted to take them

(12-07-2021 16:35 )winsaw Wrote:  by all accounts Sterling was asked to take one and said no

That isn't true and Southgate's already said it isn't true. Nobody declined to take a penalty.

It's hard to see how Sterling would have been asked anyway. His penalty record's only 5/9.

Well at least through your own words we know that you have no meaningful knowledge of football or of human nature. By speaking out against Sterling in the way you have you are no better than the dregs of society who embarrassed this country with their drunken & racist behaviour. It’s a team game but you pick on Sterling. What about the other players who did not take a penalty? Criticise them as well as you seem keen to do with cricketers & footballers who fail to reach your standards of sporting prowess.

(12-07-2021 15:50 )HannahsPet Wrote:  

(12-07-2021 14:50 )KerrAvon Wrote:  First good team we meet in the tournament and we go out, it's as simple as that

Are you saying Croatia Scotland and Germany and Denmark are shit teams

Lets look at England's last two tournaments: In 2018 they qualified for the knockout stages by beating two teams outside the top 50 then lost to Belgium. The played a Colombia side that were definitely a threat but not as good as they were in 2014 & it went to penalties, they then played a Sweden team who were well organised but carried no real threat, of Sweden's two strikers one played in the United Arab Emirates league, the other played in the French Ligue 1 & was sold to an Australian team that summer. Then they got to the Semi's where they lost to Croatia & then lost to Belgium in the 3rd place play off. So England's record at Russia against teams that could of beat them was played 4, won 1 & lost 3

On to Euro 2020, Croatia were not the side they were at World Cup 3 yrs earlier, with no Mandzukic they were without the tip of the spear to their attack & never really looked like threatening. Scotland played against them with real impetus but lacked the quality to put them away. Czech Republic were ranked 40th in the world & again like Croatia had no real drive against England. Germany are of course a team of world class players but again had no real energy to get at them, yet despite that up until England scored in 75th min anyone could of won that game. Ukraine were basically Sweden & had no real chance of ever beating England, a team that is bereft of quality players & no real attacking threat. I honestly thought they were out of the tournament until i looked at the round of 16 fixtures on the TV guide saw that they were playing Sweden & said to my self "Fuck sake Ukraine are still in the tournament, when did that happen ?" Then the semi against Denmark where England are the better team but Denmark are at least a team that are good enough to beat England on their day, England won that & then lost to Italy.

So England's record against teams that could beat them: Belgium, Colombia, Croatia, Belgium again, Germany, Denmark & Italy is played 7 won 3 lost 4 & their record against teams that are on their level i.e subtract Colombia & Denmark because even though they are capable of an upset England clearly are a step up in terms of quality then the record is played 5 won 1 lost 4

In those 3 matches that they won they scraped past Colombia on penalties, beat a poor Germany without being that good themselves & scraped past Denmark with an OG & an extremely dubious penalty on the rebound.

In the matches they lost Belgium won both without conceding, Croatia were considerably better for 75 minutes & Italy dominated the game with 66% possession, were the better team for 75 minutes & lets be honest in a game that lasted for, once you add four periods of stoppage time, about 130 minutes England scored in the 2nd minute but can anyone really remember a good chance they had for the 128 mins after Shaw's goal ? The were definitely the poorer team in all matches its not like it was a 12 round heavyweight match that was ended on points.

With the the exception of Germany before playing Italy in the final did England up against any top quality attackers who score consistently at club level ?

In both tournaments England had a guilded route to the last two matches, with the exception of Germany who were poor. That doesn't mean to say that they could not have gone to the semi's or the final in the other half of the draw but based on these performances it would of been a lot harder

(12-07-2021 15:50 )HannahsPet Wrote:  

(12-07-2021 14:50 )KerrAvon Wrote:  First good team we meet in the tournament and we go out, it's as simple as that

Are you saying Croatia Scotland and Germany and Denmark are shit teams

Germany are the only good team out of that 4 and even they ain't what they was now and England didn't even beat Scotland anyway.

(12-07-2021 17:14 )Kingsmind Wrote:  Germany are the only good team out of that 4 and even they ain't what they was now and England didn't even beat Scotland anyway.

How can Denmark not be a good team? They just reached the semi-finals?

lot of jealousy here from non England supporters.

(12-07-2021 17:18 )Regenerated Wrote:  

(12-07-2021 17:14 )Kingsmind Wrote:  Germany are the only good team out of that 4 and even they ain't what they was now and England didn't even beat Scotland anyway.

How can Denmark not be a good team? They just reached the semi-finals?

They are in the top 10 fifa rankings

(12-07-2021 17:55 )dirtytommy Wrote:  lot of jealousy here from non England supporters.

We have been in there heads for Decades

(12-07-2021 16:45 )William H Bonney Wrote:  It's hard to see how Sterling would have been asked anyway. His penalty record's only 5/9.

It looks to me as though Sterling was 9th on the list. If I've interpreted the TV footage correctly. Southgate points at Pickford, Phillips and then Grealish. You can see Grealish nodding. Only then does he point at Sterling.