The future of the nightshow/Are you happy?

Okay, this is two, largley related, questions rolled into one.

What do you think the future holds for these Babeshows and us, the viewer? Do they live out their lives in their current guise, or is change inevitable, and if so, which way will this change go - harder or softer output?

And here's the second part of the question: Are you happy with the current format? I strongly suspect that most of you are not, if the popularity of the naughtier clips of old are anything to go by.
What's the ideal, full-on hardcore, or for all the shows to put out material like Babestar did in its hayday?

Here's my take. I watch these shows to mastubate to. I'm not interested in what football team a particular babe supports, or where she went on holiday this year, nor am I interested in phoning/texting them, and to be quite frank the shows just aren't doing it for me at the moment.
My dream is that they stay away from full-on hardcore (just as dull as present after a couple of nights), and go for an area where they're allowed to stimulate themselves, discretely, but not so discretely that we're not allowed to see anything. A general relaxation of the rules is what I want, but not a total abolishment.

The channels are at they're lowest point since they began. I personally think that the girls should be able to put they're hands down they're pants when on the phone, i think this would attract more viewers and would be more interesting to watch

(27-07-2009 13:52 )steven6 Wrote:  The channels are at they're lowest point since they began. I personally think that the girls should be able to put they're hands down they're pants when on the phone, i think this would attract more viewers and would be more interesting to watch

haha yes get more viewers and get them taken off-air pretty sharply also
and with a very large fine also

if that is what you want, you might be better off watching some porn lol

be grateful you got the shows cause if they go which they probably will you have nothing to moan about. sorry people but the future of the babeshows is bleak and all this moan on a forum is not gonna do anything to fix it so just accept the fact the good days are long on so enjoy them while you can

The future is bright, the future is the Babeshows!

(27-07-2009 13:58 )Mike Wrote:  

(27-07-2009 13:52 )steven6 Wrote:  The channels are at they're lowest point since they began. I personally think that the girls should be able to put they're hands down they're pants when on the phone, i think this would attract more viewers and would be more interesting to watch

haha yes get more viewers and get them taken off-air pretty sharply also
and with a very large fine also

if that is what you want, you might be better off watching some porn lol

I think Steven's point was valid as I suspect that he was suggesting that they should be allowed (i.e. within the rules set by Ofcom) to do this, not that they should do it by breaking the rules.

On a similar note, I do find the furious rubbing of the top of their thigh area a little pointless - while recognising that this is obviously the closest they're allowed to come to touching themselevs.

(27-07-2009 13:58 )G@Z! Wrote:  be grateful you got the shows cause if they go which they probably will you have nothing to moan about.

This is a discussion forum Gaz. That means people are able to discuss things, whether its lavishing praise on their favourtie babes, discussing the state of the shows, putting their point of view across, imparting experiences both positive and negative.

As I posted on another thread my slant is that Ofcom is an out dated organisation and severly due for a upgrade. Ok so we should have rules on what and when but the way they are going about it is poor. Another gripe i have is this Asian babes on Babeworld. I channel and now the web stream. I know for a fact that some of the girls are struggling to get shifts now. One of the girls got some work from another channel and i havent seen her on nights since. Still £1.50pm to phone asian babes and you can bet they wont be on the money our home girls were on!As i say what next China babes, Tibet Babes, Mongolian babes, all done for more profit!! I for one wont be useing their service. Its just like all the call centres going to India, if this works how long before the other channels catch on. I like my home grown babes!!! Tsu has it right , time changes everything but unfortunately not always for the better. Support our own girls!!!!!!

I love the idea of Tibet Babes, Mongolian babes. But yeah the channels are the worst i have ever seen and babestation is the worst of the bunch i only really watch when camilla is on otherwise it bores me to tears. Bangbabes seems to be the only channel that holds my interest for more than 5 mins lately......that and makara's ass

(27-07-2009 13:58 )Mike Wrote:  haha yes get more viewers and get them taken off-air pretty sharply also
and with a very large fine also

I disagree.

The last time OFCOM tried their luck with a Babe Channel was last month. (Bang Babes)

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/o...sue137.pdf

Bang Babes did not roll over for OFCOM, they fought their corner and no fine was issued.

Bang Media said "The content met generally accepted standards for a post-watershed programme in the adult section of the SKY EPG" They also denied that the content was as strong as OFCOM stated. And that was case-closed.

For those of you who have a cloudy memory and think Babe Star was taken off air for being "too hard", that was not the case.

It was the ASA that went after BabeStar and the ASA passed the matter onto OFCOM.

Look for Love (the home of BabeStar) held a licence as a teleshopping channel. (Therefor the ASA intervention.)
A Premium rate telephone service of a sexual nature was used, which goes against the CAP TV Advertising standards code. They didn’t have the correct licence to show a Babe Show. And they didn’t care as they were given the chance to rectify this and they didn't bother.

Babe Star also stated that the whole show was live. It wasn’t. Babestar continued to advertise that you could speak to the Girl on screen. You couldn't. The callers were being defrauded.

The rolling t&c’s banner was too small, they were given ample opportunity to change this. They didn't.

OFCOM and the ASA gave them a chance to rectify the problems. They chose not to.




What the Girls show/do not show is defined by the individual channels producers.

OFCOM are not standing in the corner of the studio with big stick telling the Girls what to do.

And as the recent case of OFCOM/Bang Media shows that OFCOM are not going to fine/shut down a channel if that channel sticks up for themselves.

Just because Cellcast choose to get out their cheque book when ever OFCOM comes sniffing does not mean other channels should, or would.