A request for information

Can it be told why a ban was given, for typing and sending an argument against being molested as a child, being called mad, as well as many other (not taken as, however... due to their irrelevance and lack of factuality) insults, simply because another accused this user, by claiming such a thing, use of this user name in front of such slander?

It won't be appreciated, but unbanning will be.

These insults started when it was called into question, why sexual instincts and its characteristics, still exist in any decision making process about sex (for example, there has to be better philosophical, mathematical, physical, chemical, biological and plausible arguments made, than simply "Who gives a fuck") and if they are or are not, rational to be used in such a subject as lust and erotica.

If that is not in plain enough English, for a limited understanding of what is to be called English: for definitive and reasonable purposes... then suggestions would be to either learn, follow INSTRUCTION or find someone else who does, and get them to explain it in some meaningful way, that would be understood, without losing its point.

(11-11-2010 23:29 )memberchannel2 Wrote:  Can it be told why a ban was given, for typing and sending an argument against being molested as a child, being called mad, as well as many other (not taken as, however... due to their irrelevance and lack of factuality) insults, simply because another accused this user, by claiming such a thing, use of this user name in front of such slander?

It won't be appreciated, but unbanning will be.

These insults started when it was called into question, why sexual instincts and its characteristics, still exist in any decision making process about sex (for example, there has to be better philosophical, mathematical, physical, chemical, biological and plausible arguments made, than simply "Who gives a fuck") and if they are or are not, rational to be used in such a subject as lust and erotica.

If that is not in plain enough English for a limited understanding of what is to be called English for definitive and reasonable purposes, then suggestions would be to either learn, follow INSTRUCTION or find someone else who does, and get them to explain it in some meaningful way, that would be understood, without losing its point.

For starters you have not been Banned you have just received a ten minute time out which i thought was for the best as you seemed to be winding up all the other Chatbox users so before things got out of hand i thought it was better to remove what was causing the problem in the first place. All Chatbox users were getting along fine until you started posting. Please rember the chatbox is a place for members to just hang out and relax, talk rubbish and generally have a bit of fun and banter.

After being unbanned due to that ban lasting as long as it took to request being unbanned, this was recorded:

(23:32:26) Forum Robot: Welcome to the UK Babe Channels Chatbox. Please follow the rules of the chatbox which you can read by clicking here
(23:28:06) ynot2005: yup
(23:28:07) eyesonly4u: i love that word 'escorting'
(23:28:20) simplymarko: hes been posting something for about 10 mins eyes, im curious what this is gonna be
(23:28:27) Forum Robot: SFR please log out an log back in using your proper IP use of proxy's are not allowed if not you will be kicked
(23:28:41) ynot2005: but she was with agencies before
(23:28:46) eyesonly4u: maybe he's thanking us
(23:28:56) simplymarko:
(23:29:11) eyesonly4u: he wanted the thai webstream, chicks with dicks
(23:29:13) simplymarko: sounds dumb ...but whats a proxy :?
(23:29:28) Forum Robot: rogerthedoger has been logged out (Timeout).
(23:29:30) simplymarko: and he was asking if we are confused??
(23:29:34) 2Bud: Oh btw mark Pure2Bud also offers an escorting service of £120 an hour
(23:29:38) eyesonly4u: i know
(23:29:48) simplymarko: really? what do i get for that?
(23:30:12) Chilly: Here's her profile, ynot: http://www.adultwork.com/Amber+S​tarz Some guy on the forum wanted to know who she was as he's booked her. :?
(23:30:16) eyesonly4u: eyesonly4u.com offers domination>:-D
(23:30:20) Forum Robot: chrislatimer logs into the Chat.
(23:30:31) simplymarko: chris, you missed the show!
(23:30:42) ynot2005: yeah Chilly, obv things have gone downhill
(23:30:46) ynot2005: shame
(23:31:16) chrislatimer: what show did i miss mark
(23:31:30) Forum Robot: SFR has been logged out (Kicked).
(23:31:32) simplymarko: oh just some crazy man from the future turned up in here
(23:31:41) chrislatimer: huh
(23:32:15) eyesonly4u: check the thread mark
(23:32:22) Forum Robot: memberchannel2 logs into the Chat.
(23:32:27) chrislatimer: who was this crazy man
(23:32:40) 2Bud: there he is chris
(23:32:43) eyesonly4u: :Dding ding round 2
(23:32:50) Chilly: He's back! :O
(23:32:54) memberchannel2: http://www.babeshows.co.uk/show​thread.p...=lastp​ost
(23:32:54) Forum Robot: astonv1 rolls 1d6 and gets 2.
(23:33:00) chrislatimer: memberchannel welcome ya crazy bastard
(23:33:22) eyesonly4u: u got a friend, u got a friend in meO:-D
(23:33:39) memberchannel2: Next time it will be a personal message to root administrator. I prefer to use my words of reason, and my typing alone, and not my skills with the use of computers and how to evade security protocol, in order to fulfill my needs.
(23:34:00) chrislatimer: oo its a gimmick
(23:34:04) chrislatimer: i thought it was a real nutjob
(23:34:12) Chilly: When Gemma was on Babestation, that was when that channel was at its best. B) Don't recall her doing many shifts at Angels TV. 8)
(23:34:14) chrislatimer: my gimmickdar is sky high
(23:34:16) 2Bud: Yup a complete act chris
(23:34:27) eyesonly4u: so did we chris
(23:35:06) ynot2005: Bazinga
(23:35:26) chrislatimer: memberchannel good sir i saw you typed the thing you typed about the thing that was typed in here which lead to ban due to the typing of the thing you typed, your response ?
(23:35:31) ynot2005: nah Chilly, she didnt show up for half her shifts
(23:35:49) Chilly: RRROGER had a dig at astonv1. :O
(23:35:49) memberchannel2: I'd like to ignore people, but I don't do like. I do need. And I won't ignore you if I read and acknowledge that you all have a choice in all the decisions you make, when it comes to conversational discourse.
(23:35:53) eyesonly4u: don't poke the beast chris:?
(23:36:24) ynot2005: memberchannel buddy, are you trying to come out?
(23:36:27) 2Bud: theres is always one annoying person, but even DM wasnt this bad
(23:36:34) eyesonly4u:
(23:36:34) chrislatimer: need is the art of liking memberchannel just like being a douche is the art of being memberchannel
(23:36:38) memberchannel2: If you think I will rise to any bait, you would be wrong. I do not respond to conditioning, I respond to your ability to form a change in your decision making.
(23:36:45) Chilly: Seems astonv1 is finally posting something positive for a change. :?
(23:36:49) eyesonly4u: smile and nod every1
(23:37:10) simplymarko: aston is always positive in his posts, whats he on about
(23:37:23) chrislatimer: aston is sir postive
(23:37:26) ynot2005: mannnnn
(23:37:51) Chilly: Not sure, Hayley needs to a have a word with RRROGER.
(23:37:57) simplymarko: rrroger is just stumped that nobody agreed with him
(23:38:06) chrislatimer: well memberchannel my procrastinicity to change my mind is subfounded by your ability to come across a wackjob supermo ya get me
(23:38:17) eyesonly4u: not even ledders?
(23:38:18) simplymarko: but i got a thanks from ledders
(23:38:21) astonv1: she'd fuckin tear him a new one chilly
(23:38:28) chrislatimer: did i miss something in the lori thread yesterday as a lot of the stuff got moved
(23:39:04) memberchannel2: When were your wants considered above your needs?
(23:39:22) eyesonly4u: yawn
(23:39:33) chrislatimer: when i had the money to post on the house of commons memberchannel2 is a strange fellow
(23:39:43) 2Bud: 8)
(23:39:43) eyesonly4u: i want u to go but i don't need u to
(23:40:11) chrislatimer: memberchannel i can do this all day son you may as well say goodbye and head back to the basement
(23:40:39) Chilly: She didn't turn up, yet I thought she was really good mates with Cleo, ynot? Not really helping a friend out, is it?
(23:40:43) chrislatimer: aston bit harsh on roger werent ya :O
(23:41:16) memberchannel2: I will reiterate: why did you make a judgment so condemning and damnable, so someone that hasn't even attempted to go through their claims on any subject, except themselves to be a credible source of information, that they truly have an ability to acknowledge your ability to change your decision making process?
(23:41:18) astonv1: he's a fuck wit chris
(23:41:19) chrislatimer: am bored think ill wade in on the ava blue issue
(23:41:45) Chilly: Slate Rammy for upseeting a girl.
(23:41:48) eyesonly4u: pro or ante
(23:41:51) Forum Robot: Rammyrascal logs into the Chat.
(23:41:55) simplymarko: oh yeah rrroger has a few strong views on that one chris
(23:42:02) ynot2005: Yeah Chilly....but they havent spoken since
(23:42:04) chrislatimer: i will be pro ava tbh
(23:42:07) chrislatimer: i pick pro
(23:42:11) chrislatimer: lets go have some fun
(23:42:35) eyesonly4u: do u remember the simple days when this room was about tits and arse of the female variety
(23:42:40) Chilly: Any other girls you've upset today, Rammy? >:-D
(23:43:05) chrislatimer: i cant go pro ava after i slated sammie p for the same thing
(23:43:05) ynot2005: whats wrong with ava's tits anyways?
(23:43:10) chrislatimer: i aint no hyprocrite
(23:43:24) Rammyrascal: not yet but still time lol
(23:43:25) simplymarko: dunno but its up to her if she doesnt want to get them out
(23:43:31) memberchannel2: You do realize this is a place to instantly (including latency issues, currently 4 seconds), communicate and form discussions, without any need to substantiate what is held in detail personally, in any physical realm?
(23:43:33) eyesonly4u: don't know they stayed hidden though
(23:43:50) Rammyrascal: ava has explained why
(23:44:04) eyesonly4u: y rammy
(23:44:07) eyesonly4u: surgery
(23:44:10) 2Bud: get the fuck out of here!!! 8)
(23:44:15) Rammyrascal: yep
(23:44:28) ynot2005: didnt notice her boobs were any bigger
(23:44:30) ynot2005: oh well
(23:44:48) simplymarko: i thought rrrogers post about cosmetic sugeery going wrong was a bit off though
(23:45:17) memberchannel2: "(23:42:35) eyesonly4u: do u remember the simple days when this room was about tits and arse of the female variety" - Well OK, let's start by arguing why a female should have an arse or tits, for that matter...
(23:45:31) eyesonly4u: my issue is that people were all of ruby when she did her night for only showing some tit, yet support ava and want her to do more nights
(23:45:39) eyesonly4u: over
(23:45:55) 2Bud: Seriously Wazo kick this annoying prick
(23:46:13) chrislatimer: my excuse was i dont like dannie personally haha
(23:46:18) chrislatimer: i just wanted to have a go at her
(23:46:31) 2Bud: :|
(23:46:39) simplymarko: 2bud click your ignore button mate, i think most of us have
(23:46:47) Forum Robot: No arguments are to be brought from the forum or anywhere else into the chatbox.
(23:47:00) Chilly: Understandable, ynot. Shame, as those two got on really well when they worked at Cellcast. Some great shhows from them.
(23:47:01) Rammyrascal: i have apologised to ava and look forward to her next night, didnt mean to upset her
(23:47:04) eyesonly4u: is that us?
(23:47:10) 2Bud: ah ya good idea
(23:47:24) chrislatimer: yeah i just commented on ava and mentioned your courage in apologising rammy
(23:47:31) memberchannel2: That's a quite a contradictory thing for a bot to display.
(23:47:33) 2Bud: all done
(23:47:45) simplymarko: i dont think you would have upset her rammy its rrroger i thought was out of order
(23:47:50) eyesonly4u: peace at last
(23:47:55) Chilly: I think we all know you'll be praising her next show, Rammy.
(23:47:58) chrislatimer: rrroger is rrroger
(23:48:13) chrislatimer: and she still put a better show on then most girls
(23:48:13) memberchannel2: Every single position, whether it be complete consensus or an agreement, is an argument for or against such position. So everything is an argument: in a way, everything is politics.
(23:48:15) Rammyrascal: i will chilly lol
(23:48:50) memberchannel2: When do any grown ups join this channel?
(23:49:18) 2Bud: I hope hes still typing even though none of us can see it, thats the 1st time i used the ignore button B)
(23:49:19) Chilly: Your next challenge should be to have a dig at Kitty, Rammy. Go on, I dare you. >:-D
(23:49:28) ynot2005: i dont get that ava girl
(23:49:43) chrislatimer: chilly if he does he can join our clcub
(23:49:46) chrislatimer: club
(23:49:46) ynot2005: shes done shit on every channel shes been on
(23:49:50) simplymarko: he hasnt left 2bud so i guess so
(23:50:02) eyesonly4u: we really gotta get a doorman on the door
(23:50:02) chrislatimer: i like ava
(23:50:14) Forum Robot: The Chatbox is a place for members to just hang out and relax, talk rubbish and generally have a bit of fun and banter.

First of all, explain why this behavior violates rules.

Secondly, defend this position against a rational rebuttal to (if any) violations.

Also, explain why every user in this chat channel has been given every chance, for all intensive purposes, to provide a credible and meaningful response, but simply to choose to "ignore (using ignore button)" and immediately condemn any reprisal in their rapidly snapped, negative fixation.

If these are immature minds that have no power to make decisions, where their behavior has no consciousness that controls it respectively to each and every situation, with fair accuracy and discretion, then that would condemn them for their mistakes.

none of us insulted this member guy we all played along got bored so ignored him.

FACT.

(12-11-2010 00:06 )chrislatimer Wrote:  none of us insulted this member guy we all played along got bored so ignored him.

FACT.

Quote:(23:33:00) chrislatimer: memberchannel welcome ya crazy bastard

Quote:(23:34:00) chrislatimer: oo its a gimmick
(23:34:04) chrislatimer: i thought it was a real nutjob

Any further pointing would require poking a brain.

Facts are not facts if they do not support what evidence can be ascertained to apply.

Here's another:

Quote:(23:36:34) chrislatimer: need is the art of liking memberchannel just like being a douche is the art of being memberchannel

And i thought Mr Logic was just a cartoon character in Viz...

ok Let me provide an alternative view on this.

This evening we had around 10-12 chatters in chatbox who were chatting away quite happily, we had no problem with you joining us in there at all.
I cannot remember the exact topic of conversation however I believe it was about something that had been posted on a thread and we were all enjoying a bit of banter about it. however from nowhere you posted:

memberchannel2: I know this is silly... because most of you probably consider your sexuality and all its dos and don'ts to be somehow, deep seated in your subjective identity... BUT pretend for one moment, that there was actually a DEBATE of what is a rational objective position, and what isn't.

we all explained that was a bit deep and tried to get our coversation going again and I distinctly said to you that its a bit deep we just really talk about football, the girls and ahve a bit of a laugh. we continued with our conversation however rather than join in you constantly posted the following statements:

memberchannel2: For example, let's say there is a debate about... what is and what isn't heterosexual pornography.

memberchannel2: Well, anyone that actually considers all of their sexuality to be 99% conditioning, and 1% biological, should raise their fucking hands, if they prefer a beter scientific world view, in EVERY subject, including lust and its endeavors.

) memberchannel2: I mean you honestly think that going on your instincts, is BETTER than having a scientific method to assess your claims?

) memberchannel2: This is internet: there are no identities TO protect. Your mind is your own, so open it.

memberchannel2: The first sign you are making progress in a repugnant and egotistical assembly, is that your wits are called into question, before you even deliver any claims.

memberchannel2: Making feigned attempts at trying to disarm my statements with half-cocked assumed derogations, isn't even humorous to me. I can simply claim such a thing as negative to prove you untrue.

all of which made most members of the room very uncomfortable and did have most of us reaching for their ignore button as this to be honest was just spamming our conversation.

Yes you were writing in English but in such a strange way nobody could understand this nor really wanted to talk abotu it.

I am not sure if it was then you who tried to reenter as SFM using proxy code which was against the rules but then you proceeded to some further comments regarding whatever you were trying to say and advising us you were going to tell a root administrator

I also remember some very strange comments from you a few nights ago.

Seeing i have myself kicked you for making insulting remarks about certain babes in the past and quite frankly making other people in the chatbox quite uncomfortable with the subjects you choose to discuss. So i imagine the mod that did kick you had very good reason to do so.

The rules are there for a reason if you don't agree with them don't bother to login to the chatbox its as simple as that.

We shall fight on the beaches
we shall fight on the landing grounds
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets
we shall fight in the hills
we shall fight in the threads and in the chatbox
WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER OUR FORUM TO THE EVIL FORCES