Does Doing Night Shows Effect a Day Girls' Image?

Whilst mulling over the recent controversial changes that Studio 66 have made to their night time schedules I had a thought:

It has been speculated on here (not by me) that 66 are actually holding Evelyn back from showing any more in her 'tease' slots than she has to date. I wondered if it could be possible that 66 (or any other babe channel for that matter) might actually want to keep a girl away from going topless, talking dirty, etc., if they thought doing so would keep her existing fan-base happiest and calling - more than any influx of new business from her going topless might bring.

Now I don't actually this scenario this has happened at 66 (or anywhere else) as yet but I wondered what others on here thought to it's likelihood. So, to help try to judge, I thought I would start this poll.

I am basically trying to find out if a day girl's refusal to shed her clothes can actually enhance her image in some consumer's eyes - make her more special or wholesome for instance - and make them more likely to call her. I wonder if anyone has actually been put off from calling a day girl because she also gets her baps out at night? Is this something that a channel should ever worry about effecting a girl's overall (day and night) call income?

So the question that this poll asks dayshow callers/viewers is this:
Could a day girl going topless for the first time on nights ever have a detrimental effect on her image in your eyes and put you off calling her on days?

i have no idea why it would effect their image, surely any sane bloke would want to see a daybabe they like on a nightshow with her tits out

As phrased, the answer has to be "no". As a viewer, I don't think that seeing a preferred dayshow babe naked on a nightshow would cause me to think less of her. It would not so despoil her "girl next door" image that I might never call her again (if that is what you are driving at). The Little General doesn't work that way

[As an irrelevant aside, I can honestly say that I'd be disappointed if my daughter earned her living on a dayshow; but seeing her on a nightshow would send me reaching for the sleeping pills! I mention that for anyone who can't seem to wrap their heads around the 'mystery' of why any girl would refuse to do a nightshow. I would wager my left testicle that that is the reason for more than one girl.]

As an occasional caller, I can also say that there are some girls that I would sooner call if they DIDN'T get naked than if they did. And this goes back to the fact that meaningless moaning-and-groaning does nothing for me as a phone sex experience, but sexy chat does. The problem with some girls is that once the tits come out and the phone lines light up, any effort to "chat" goes out the window and you might as well be talking to a pre-recorded message. In that case, I would sooner have her keep her clothes on, but put a little more effort into her phone performance than waste my money on a bad "live porn" performance. Maddie Rose and Sophie Hart are good examples of this. I am now more likely to call them if I happen to catch them in the 9:00 to 10:00 slot on babestation than later on when they are stripped down, oiled up and fully into their unresponsive sex-noise autopilot.

Thanks to those that answered or replied to this poll.

Although the number of votes cast was low, if the sample can be seen as representative, it would seem that most on this forum (90% apparently) have little truck with the idea that it would be beneficial for anyone to hold a babe back from going topless for fear of 'sullying' her in the eyes of her existing fans. Or that a babe should feel the need to stay nudity-free to keep her day fans 'onside' in any way.

That a babe might be constrained by a channel in this way always seemed a shaky theory to me but I thought I would have a shot at putting it forward for consideration in the best terms I could. My aim was not to analyse why any particular babe might not want to get her tits out* but to rule out those considerations I have outlined when assessing what makes a day babe a success with her fans.

Of course the question remains: Is that enough for people then to be happy when those same girls are used on 'tease-lite' night sessions? And happy enough to call in large numbers and keep these slots in operation (for a while at least)?

As Goodfella states, for the caller, there are more valid reasons for wanting a girl to stay away from the established nightgirl sicht than fears over her image. Just as nudity restricts movement and can be used by a babe to show less, dirty talk done badly can stifle a girl's personality on a call and become an excuse to do things by rote.

This gives a clue to what 66 apparently tapped into with these shows: Personality in chat would seem to be of paramount importance in their success over and above dirty talk even when accompanied by reserved visuals. Performances that have the first two and/or hot visuals are, of course, preferable but the need for the first one overrides all other considerations with today's callers it would seem. (What caller Paul1982 says here runs along the same lines.)

It would also appear that user Fernanda stb may indeed speak for the (mostly) silent majority when he says that Evelyn (for example) could keep doing what she she has been doing. The callers to her post-10pm shows may not be represented very well amongst the most vocal on here but there can be no denying that she and 66 definitely tapped into a need with them while they lasted.

* Goodfella gives the likely answers for most girls on this one. Although what he says prompts another possibility: That the girl or the operator may not think she would be very good at the naughty chat even if there was a 'want' for her to do it from either party.

Personally for me it would improve their image.

its not the fact they get their tits out. because a lot of day girls do topless and even nude modelling but it can be difficult to go back to normal day to day conversation after you have had the sexy stuff least i found that to be the case with all the day girls ive phone and then called on nights. thats why BS's Naughty chat daytime is a great little option

Completely from my experience watching the shows,mostly once a dayshow babe does nights their must be an increase said babe continuing the trend as most of my favourite day shows all ended up doing night never to be seen on a day show again as most people want them naked

Me on the other hand would prefer to see them being flirty to the TV camera wearing sexy outfits and having a laugh rather then seeing them butt naked being limited to certain positions while all the director and producers get an eyeful

The day shows have gone more web based since I use to watch regular if you ask me,u can see some of the babes getting the webcam right well I ain't gonna carry on saying that bit but knowing the focus is more for the webcam kinda takes the edge of watching on the telly,

As a general rule,u could come here posting how great the TV show was for any babe and the shows would be more interactive to the TV camera and it was the babes flirting and us complementing and it just kept going back an forth

The more compliments the sexier the show would be which would then deserve and get more compliments

Contemplation of being conflicted as I'm sort of on the fence at the moment in general but their was a time when I said,
As everyone was requesting all the sexier day babes do nights the days would be effected and now here we are discussing this six years later lol

I've only just woke up and didn't expect to be writing here about this when I came to the forum but it isn't really gonna matter now

PS, my comments must be based on the opposite side of your poll above as the daybabes regular showed boobs which is why they were requested or switched to nights so maybe my comments can't be calculated sorry

It would make her go up in my estimation because it would mean tits and possibly even nudity. I love tits and possibly even nudity.