TheWatcher Wrote:There is a vast amount of free software available for all sorts of purposes. I do all my video and screenshot edits in linux on this computer.
Firefox and OpenOffice work just the same as in windows.
Dont expect to be able to play modern pc games in linux though.
Some older games can be played by using the wine "windows emulator" program as can a lot of old windows programs.
Yup, plenty of free/cheap software, not so well catered for with professional applications though. Besides I like applications to work out the box, not have to worry about updating kernels and then realizing I need another application, from somewhere totally different, to get things working the way I want. Freedom of choice is a good thing, but in terms of Linux distros and application choices it can be counter productive. That is both Linux's strong and weak point. Whilst their sector of the market stays so fragmented it'll never make the mainstream desktop.
Most customers want things to just work, they don't want to know how, or that if you spend 50% of your time playing with it it might be a little bit faster or more secure. Look at cars as an example. The most sold ones are far from the best available, but they work! They're easy to drive and when they break down they are cheap enough to fix with plenty of people knowing how to fix them quickly
DDT43, it doesn't matter at this stage if you go 32 or 64-bit unless you have specific apps/drivers that only compile in one or the other. At this stage you're just testing out the waters so to speak. Neither choice will effect your current windows build differently from the other. I would however suggest if you're looking seriously then 64-bit is the way to go and should give you better performance with applications optimized for it as well as a larger than 4Gb memory address space if you have that much
Will save you all the hassle of switching to 64-bit further down the line as well and finding the apps you use don't work or need recompiling
Oh BTW, been about a year since I looked at Linux seriously, but I'd disagree about Ubuntu being the best choice for newbies. Linuxmint, which is based on Ubuntu (which is in turn based on Debian - see what I mean about fragmented) seemed like an easier install back then on a wider amount of hardware, but then a week can be a long time in Linux, let alone a year