Dave_A
Senior Poster
Posts: 488
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 19
|
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion
(07-01-2017 19:52 )HEX!T Wrote: unless the company has a new owner who has nothing to do with the previous owner. its not gonna happen.
ofcom banned the owner of teasme tv from owning a tv operation from what i gathered at the time of closure. then when they found out the same people part owned redlight they removed there license also.
(at least thats what i heard.)
It would have been a bit difficult for Ofcom to have taken away red lights licence, the reason being they didn't have one, RLC used to broadcast on Playboy owned and licensed tv channels .
The Bangbabes/tease me tv programs also broadcast for a time using Playboy licenses and channels after Ofcom revoked their own licence .
As far as i know the owners of tease me tv were not part owners of RLC, but RLC did originally when they first started running phone in babe channels, operate using various services provided by tease me TV, or something like that .
{edit} Winsaw probably knows more about it than me, but i think it's about right what iv'e said .
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2017 20:26 by Dave_A.)
|
|
08-01-2017 20:10 |
|
ceasman
Banned
Posts: 728
Joined: Dec 2008
|
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & discussion
Babestation is so watered down these days that if one of the other channels actually took a chance and put some energy and fun into their shows they'd clean up and would shut at least one of BS channels , can't imagine babestation could afford to lose many more callers.
Love to see them get a kick up the arse and hopefully stop all these boring gimmick calls and maybe get the girls to try to vary their shows each night . You can bet your life that maddie will be sat back with a cushion in her lap pretending to play (of cam of course) and Preeti will be sat side in on the desk , back against wall doing the same (if she not back to cam shaking ass ) and Ashley will spend the duration of her shift back turned shaking ass.
So tedious I just switch off like many others .
|
|
15-01-2017 22:33 |
|
Snooks
Olympic Champion Keely
Posts: 53,589
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 281
|
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion
Is any babe on any channel REALLY doing anything that much more outstanding than any other?
If I am honest with myself the answer has to be no.
The sets don't change, the positions don't change, the moves don't change, the facial expressions don't change, the mood doesn't change, the outfits hardly change. The only thing that changes is the ambition level goes up or down slightly. But the creativity, imagination and excitement is nowhere to be seen from anyone really because the routines have become too familiar. Does the quality of visual stimulus merit the cost of the call? No.
This is the key imo.
It hardly matters to me anymore who is to blame. Babes, producers, camera operators, OFCOM, name whoever you like.
The bottom line is the shows are poor in terms of tempting me to call.
Increasingly I am reaching a point where the ability of anyone to defy that trend is dwindling ever further towards zero. When that ZERO day finally comes it will be time to stop watching altogether on the basis I am watching less and less as it is.
(This post was last modified: 15-01-2017 23:38 by Snooks.)
|
|
15-01-2017 23:36 |
|
Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion
'They' (Lamestation in particular; they do seem genuinely (even) worse than S66, these days, IMO) have largely abandoned the 'traditional shows', in favour of the prevcam revenue stream - this, along with DBS/TBS, split screen, 'boxouts', crap sets, rubbish lighting & camerawork, crap stream quality, broadcaster enforced 'tameness', gimmicks,,, means there is little or no hope for any improvement, as far as I can see.
All been said before, of course, but no less true now; in fact, it's only getting worse.
What a cheery note to start the week!
|
|
16-01-2017 11:10 |
|