Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Babestation review thread.
(12-11-2009 20:02 )matt38 Wrote: (12-11-2009 19:29 )vila Wrote: I thought last night's Freeview shows were a backward step after the 2 previous nights. Reede started off nude on BS1 but she was unable to move much as a result and spoiled everything by once again drawing attention to the tameness of Freeview.
On BS2 the previous night we had a short 2-4-1 interlude in which Yvette licked and sucked Kelly's nipples, ending up biting Kelly's right nipple in full screen close-up. That's as strong as anything I've ever seen from BS whether on Sky or Freeview. Last night we were back to the namby-pamby stuff again. When Yvette gently stroked Karina's nipple with her fingertips in medium-long shot Karina looked alarmed and moved her arm to hide the action.
Ffs, Cellcast, make up your minds!
The BS2 2-4-1 with Cleo and Karina could have been really hot, especially in view of Cleo's relative newness to the night scene, if only they'd been allowed to make proper physical contact instead of being restricted to the silly gentle stroking nonsense.
Vila you would have to admit still far better then what was served up by Bangbabes.
I stopped regular viewing of TS some time ago, but, as BBF has been so poor, I checked out TS over the last few nights; overall, I wasn’t very impressed; much the same censorship at play that I remember from when I used to watch it (though it was easily better than the early days on TS, and the immediate ‘post re-tune’ period (from what little I saw of this, as this was when I stopped watching)), and the 'technical nudity' is a waste of time, IMO; obviously, you don’t get to see anything, and it just restricts the babes' movement even more than normal, making for an even more boring show. Reede, for example, who was usually one of the better performers on TSF, hardly moved during her ‘c-string’ (not quite) technical nudity section.
Having said all that, and this is the particular disappointment, it was still better than BBF
On a positive note, although I’ve never been much of a fan, I was pleasantly surprised by Lori, whose performances show a dramatic improvement from how she used to be.
|
|
13-11-2009 00:47 |
|
Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Babestation review thread.
(13-11-2009 00:47 )Censorship :-( Wrote: SNIP
SNIP
...and the 'technical nudity' is a waste of time, IMO; obviously, you don’t get to see anything, and it just restricts the babes' movement even more than normal, making for an even more boring show. Reede, for example, who was usually one of the better performers on TSF, hardly moved during her ‘c-string’ (not quite) technical nudity section.
SNIP
Credit to Camilla, for her ‘technical nudity’ section this morning was unusually entertaining. Relatively speaking, there was plenty of movement; the ‘fact’ that she really seemed to be enjoying herself, which is always nice to see, also added to proceedings. The cream also helped
Nice one, Camilla.
|
|
13-11-2009 14:30 |
|