Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(20-12-2023 20:25 )karlmoore7 Wrote:  

(19-12-2023 13:36 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(19-12-2023 12:10 )Charlemagne Wrote:  ^ It's called a unique selling point. Body hair is a 'thing', and not just under their arms.
They have fans who love it.

I'm sure there are enough non hairy babes to satisfy you in the calendar.

I've said this as well when this person said that before about babes with body hair, there are plenty of people who love women with body hair. Babestation have to make money most importantly & therefore have to cater to all tastes, so have babes with body hair on their various shows.

It's called BABE station, not NICHE station. Are you saying that there's a big audience out there that likes a split second flash of a hairy pit over a 4 hour TV slot? And they will keep hairstation going ?!

I never said there is a big audience out there, just there are plenty of people out there who like women with body hair, so babestation have babes with body hair on to make money out of/from these people

would really turn into a circus with a bearderd lady

Charlie c only got her tits out for a micro second even for the advent calendar and it was the same clip as last year lol

Seeing a few people lately getting openly frustrated with the girls for spending what they're arguing is too much time on perv. I saw one of the top tippers getting quite animated in one chat, and someone else in Valentina's last night.

What are your thoughts on this? Understand that perv is part of the earner but do you think they'd earn more if people could see them?

(22-12-2023 07:50 )squidman Wrote:  Seeing a few people lately getting openly frustrated with the girls for spending what they're arguing is too much time on perv. I saw one of the top tippers getting quite animated in one chat, and someone else in Valentina's last night.

What are your thoughts on this? Understand that perv is part of the earner but do you think they'd earn more if people could see them?

The channels and babes make more from perv and buzzes. Than calls and FTA, so sadly I can't see it changing soon.

Especially when some punters are spending so much. In the future every babe's shows will be like Evelyn's

(22-12-2023 07:50 )squidman Wrote:  Seeing a few people lately getting openly frustrated with the girls for spending what they're arguing is too much time on perv. I saw one of the top tippers getting quite animated in one chat, and someone else in Valentina's last night.

What are your thoughts on this? Understand that perv is part of the earner but do you think they'd earn more if people could see them?

I've been seeing more of these arguments of late
It does alienate potential viewers/spenders, but I don't think the girls are looking at that
It's more about just eyeing in on who has credits at the moment
A lot of times not much is going on in "Perv Cam" it's more about luring people into the perv cam
I tend to talk sports during the super long Slate sessions

(20-12-2023 20:25 )karlmoore7 Wrote:  

(19-12-2023 13:36 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(19-12-2023 12:10 )Charlemagne Wrote:  ^ It's called a unique selling point. Body hair is a 'thing', and not just under their arms.
They have fans who love it.

I'm sure there are enough non hairy babes to satisfy you in the calendar.

I've said this as well when this person said that before about babes with body hair, there are plenty of people who love women with body hair. Babestation have to make money most importantly & therefore have to cater to all tastes, so have babes with body hair on their various shows.

It's called BABE station, not NICHE station. Are you saying that there's a big audience out there that likes a split second flash of a hairy pit over a 4 hour TV slot? And they will keep hairstation going ?!

Ffs, I very much doubt Babestation are dictating a certain portion of babes have to have hair.

The girls are just doing their own thing.
If they think it's impacting their earnings, they'll shave it off. If not, they won't.

(01-09-2023 21:23 )seducedx6 Wrote:  

(22-08-2023 10:26 )Joh176 Wrote:  

(21-08-2023 21:22 )Asspocalypse Wrote:  I’m sure I’m in the minority here but I’m very bored of Bethstation.

rather have Bethstation then having to sit through Laylastation or even worse Valentinastation when nobody moves for about an hour

There are and have been a number of women in recent years, who haven't been very active on camera, but I wouldn't have named those two..
Whilst there are others who are hyperactive, but unless they're actually doing something, such as actually masturbating, I don't see the point!

I've commented recently on Layla's 'movement' (see also other posts on the same page): https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2795520

In a brief review of some of my posts this year, I want to reiterate this one (1/_)

(01-09-2023 21:38 )seducedx6 Wrote:  

(23-08-2023 11:15 )Count Spankula Wrote:  

(23-08-2023 03:32 )Bbefan_london Wrote:  There are others who put on a fantastic show but don’t get the praise on here. No point mentioning names because I’ve realised it’s all about preference…

Why isn't there any point? If you think someone deserves credit then give credit where credit's due. Let's hear who's fantastic and deserves praise. Maybe someone will agree with your choices.

I don't agree that it's all about preference. For example, I would say that Michelle Moist has been extremely impressive since she joined Babestation even though she isn't a favourite of mine.

"Well, in a number of different ways, I have said, that I'd rather be underwhelmed by a show by one of the women I'm really attracted to, than watch other "types of shows and presentations" by women that don't really interest me*." - https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2795520

["To elaborate on my previous posts, from some of the commentary throughout the year, some people evidently commend mere efficiency, i.e. some women who seem to be effective, 'satisfactory', or 'popular', regularly doing mostly the same routines.
As I suggested, I find that an oddly, rather impersonal attitude, more suited to those who manage the companies.
On occasion I have indicated, when women who don't especially interest me, have turned me on, nonetheless. But even when the women I'm most attracted to, underwhelm me, the individual women in those two groups, are unlikely to swap places.",] - https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2786767 - that itself was quoting from a longer post in a different thread!

Following from my (re)post above, most emphatically reiterating this post (2/_)

(01-09-2023 22:12 )seducedx6 Wrote:  I find it odd that Bbefan_london has been described as "sycophantic", and maybe even working for BS, as his overall emphasis has been on actually interacting with individual women, rather than where they're working. (There have certainly been others on the forum, who have been more fittingly described as cheerleaders for particular channels and companies.)

Whilst I don't necessarily disagree with some of the criticisms he's questioning, I do nonetheless agree with Bbefan_london that we have to deal with the situation as it is, rather than how we would want it to be.
As I've suggested in (a) (few) post(s), which I might search and link later, the only way is down, because the babe channel format is going to fade away, rather than resume its earlier glory years.
That, alas, makes hopes for much more "honesty of endeavour", something of a lost cause.
I say that as someone who recently used up a lot of time, again, with the customer service of BS, and some similar companies, and will again, soon enough, most probably....

Review reiterating (re)post (3/_)