Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Whilst I understand the views on this forum aren't necessarily reflective of all viewers/callers, I find it interesting that the girls that do well for s66 in the end of year awards on here ie. Clare & Kandi are the natural, model-type looking girls and that is not the type of girls they are currently bringing in.

^Well the voting in the end of year awards could be down to who could be bothered to vote.

(08-01-2016 13:12 )jimminybob Wrote:  Whilst I understand the views on this forum aren't necessarily reflective of all viewers/callers, I find it interesting that the girls that do well for s66 in the end of year awards on here ie. Clare & Kandi are the natural, model-type looking girls and that is not the type of girls they are currently bringing in.

Not strictly true, Elizabeth James recently made her s66 debut & she's the natural model type, also of course Hannah Martin returned

(08-01-2016 13:12 )jimminybob Wrote:  I find it interesting that the girls that do well for s66 in the end of year awards on here ie. Clare & Kandi are the natural, model-type looking girls and that is not the type of girls they are currently bringing in.

I voted for Clare because I find her the best on the phone - and if many others did the same it defeats your argument.

^ It was just an observation, and I doubt very much there are many people who call all the girls to find out who they prefer on the phones, they will phone those they are attracted to. I need to be enticed to call, and none of the recent new signings (Hannah excepted if we're classing her as a new signing) have done that. As for Elizabeth James being a model-type, I would say that was, erm, generous

I prefer natural girls by the way, and wasn't suggesting otherwise, but there are natural model types who don't do well in the end of the year awards.

^ This is, of course, very true. I guess I still like to associate this channel with those types of girls, and the end of year awards suggest to me that I am not alone. On the Hannah front, I've noticed she's not on the schedule for any time soon so I hope it wasn't just a fleeting return

brief summary of recent developments: Amy Rose (4 personal problems, let's say) and Paige Turnah (her choice i guess, i can't believe she was fired) have definitely left.
Jessie Jensen well... it's safe to say that she's gone too...yesterday she said on her twitter that she will be on Babestationcams in the weekend. She was one of the s66 nightgirls followed on twitter by Babestation, and, apparently, the first who decided to leave. I hope she's not the last to do so
Looks like Michelle Thorne is gone too? I heard of her personal dramas.
Kara de la hoyde has disappeared . However, on her twitter studio66 isn’t mentioned
Kerrie? first the heartbreaking news of the retirement...now these enigmatic tweets...lol who knows
And what's happened to that new girl, Kitty? she's already gone? Surely she's disappeared...
They hired Lindsey Dawn McKenzie, Rebecca Moore, Chessie Kay and Elizabeth James (the Elicia Solis situation is an enigma)
We will see if they'll remain. I’m pretty sure about Rebecca Moore, she is the type of woman (ex-porn star, giant breasts) who attracts a lot of calls. Not that sure about Elizabeth. Speaking of Chessie Kay, well…my opinion could be unpopular, but I think she’s completely…how to say..”out of context” in this channel.. the hardcore performance are her trademark and her strong point.
Anyway, I have a feeling that there might be other changes in the roster (new departures)
personally, i can't say i'm particularly happy about these changes, about the type of girls they are now bringing in (with a few exceptions)

(08-01-2016 13:12 )jimminybob Wrote:  Whilst I understand the views on this forum aren't necessarily reflective of all viewers/callers, I find it interesting that the girls that do well for s66 in the end of year awards on here ie. Clare & Kandi are the natural, model-type looking girls and that is not the type of girls they are currently bringing in.

BS don't have many natural girls but they have a far better roster than S66, if S66 signed night girls of the quality of Cara Brett, Teejay Walker, Macy Leigh, Stacey Robyn and Louisa Fox then not many people will care they have fake tits if they put on good shows, but instead they choose to sign the likes of Candy Charms, Michelle Thorne, Chessie Kay and LDM

(08-01-2016 17:29 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 13:12 )jimminybob Wrote:  Whilst I understand the views on this forum aren't necessarily reflective of all viewers/callers, I find it interesting that the girls that do well for s66 in the end of year awards on here ie. Clare & Kandi are the natural, model-type looking girls and that is not the type of girls they are currently bringing in.

BS don't have many natural girls but they have a far better roster than S66, if S66 signed night girls of the quality of Cara Brett, Teejay Walker, Macy Leigh, Stacey Robyn and Louisa Fox then not many people will care they have fake tits if they put on good shows, but instead they choose to sign the likes of Candy Charms, Michelle Thorne, Chessie Kay and LDM

Isn't it more "are left with signing the likes of..."? I think if they had their complete pick they would be choosing differently don't you?