Ofcom Discussion

Iv'e just been having a further look at Ofcom's wording in Playboy TV Chats in breach ruling, there's to much to post in full, but this is a bit of what they say .
Ofcom say something about a presenter was shown at times with the top half of her body naked and the lower half hidden behind a door giving the impression that she was having sex with a unseen partner. Apparently it was something to do with simulating sex acts that broke the rules .
The licencee (Playboy) argued that "the level of nudity was very low and somewhat tamer than the standard miming of sex acts in adult chat broadcast advertising" . I think PB were talking about the sex acts shown in the free to air adverts for the encrypted channesl but not sure.
Anyway Ofcom say that "they noted the licencee's argument that the level of nudity was very low, However Ofcom say that in their view the intention of the producer and presenter was to give the impression to the viewers that the presenter was involved in real sex acts which was clearly at odds with the guidance" .

Ofcom go on to say (exact quote) " In Ofcom's view the broadcast of this material in adult chat advertising content was likely to cause serious widespread offence against generally accepted moral or cultural standards"

How the fuck do Ofcom come to the decision that what was shown by Playboy TV Chat after 12am in a specialist adult section clearly labelled and given a 18 cert in the EPG will cause serious widespread offence against generally accepted moral and cultural standards is beyond me, you can see far harder content on regular non adult channels, so how come Ofcom think people will be seriously offended if they see it broadcast on a adult channel but not on a regular channel ? .