Amber - BS Xtra

Josh -

A girl works the days and naturally the viewers expectation is nothing too raunchy and no naughty bits on show (slips don't count because they're (usually) not intentional).

Girls work on the nights and raunch, sexywear and naughty bits are the norm and expected parts of the post-watershed scheduled show.

Now, a girl from the dayshow is on a nightshow and the natural assumption is that there must be a reason and something more is to be expected - why would they not? especially after other day girl crossovers. If she (and possibly the channel) has no intention of doing anything then she and the channel are just pulling a con knowing that people will make that natural assumption, text in and waste money pursuing it.

To then excuse the girl and the channel for pulling this kind of crap by laying blame on the the texters/viewers and calling them idiots for making the natural assumption which was intentionally being exploited is frankly ridiculous. Yet that is exactly what was and is being done amidst a number of other far-fetched excuses (Not a proper night show. Different audience. Evil empire) in an effort to justify and deflect critisism from the actual ones at fault.

Excusing or accepting lousy, disrespectful and conniving behaviour and regard for the customer base/audience/fans/viewers/callers just because it has been done before is likewise ridiculous. It's still crap behaviour, it's still being done.. so why then should it not be mentioned or worse be accepted and the blame shifted to any casual viewers who are more than likely less informed or unfamiliar with the girls, channels and which ones are and aren't out to be string them along?