Ofcom Public Attitudes Survey

(02-01-2011 04:26 )eccles Wrote:  Sexarama, Sexcetera, The 21st Century Womans Guide To Sex were not genuine documentaries, they were/are thinly veiled excuses to show arousing material for viewer enjoyment and to increase viewer numbers. In some cases they reel in viewers too dishonest with themselves to admit that they get a sexual frission from sexual content: anyone seen "Why Men Watch Porn" on Channel One and able to comment?

I didn't see it - didn't know it was on or I'd have probably looked out for it as a point of interest.
Well, we know why we watch porn. (the exquisite score) We also know why we watch such other 'lite-porn' shows as mentioned above. Good old Eurotrash; all the guys watched it, we'd talk about it at work... but we'd stop shy of adding "and I had a really stormin' wank all over that czech bird's tits an' all". Why is that?
Somehow, the notion of watching porn in itself no longer ranks as a great taboo, but we still as a society skirt round the horrid, sticky topic of self-abuse in relation to it. Weird.
And maybe that's where the problem lies; it isn't about arousing material, it's just that the folks in charge of this country haven't yet accepted that our modern state (born of a once-great-but-prudish former empire) has gone through puberty and grown up. Hell, we've let them meet the girlfriend (adult entertainment) and they still haven't got the message.
I wish our political mum and dad were a little less stuffy and more contemporary and easy-going in their social outlook.

Then we could all agree what a great wank we all had over last night's babeshows.

Missing key events. Talking bollocks. Making stuff up.
~~~SAVE THE KRILL!~~~