Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion

I for one appreciate your response Lucy-Anne. Something needs to be done about off-com. They are ruining these shows. They must be affecting your income as well as the channels income.

As I said your shows used to be great. None of us are looking for hardcore shows. We just want a little tease.
If there is anything we can do to improve the shows or respond to of-com we are happy to help.
Some girls are using off-com as an excuse, (i'm not including you in this) I am guessing you are being restricted by your producers.
Off-com never said that presenters aren't allowed to move! They can stand up, walk about, change positions etc.

In my opinion you are still one of the better girls in this regard. But there are too many now that are just happy to lie in one position all day and expect calls.

If i'm gonna call i want the girl to maybe show off her legs or sit on the desk. Maybe bend down or walk about showing off her ass.
None off this is against off-com regs.

Hopefully you might be able to pass this info on to your bosses because this might improve shows across your channel.

Hopefully you and some other girls will provide some good shows in the future and hopefully you will get more income from your fans.

I hope to see you providing good shows in the future.

Oh and BTW i'm not a critic, Ur a very glamorous women with a very beautiful face.
All i want is for the shows to be entertaining.
I can't speak for everyone on here, some might have their own agenda!

Lucy Anne's daytime shows are as good as anyone's on these channels and she's certainly got the looks. Her cam shows are also good and if the DTW thread is to be believed she is very good on the phones as well. What seems to be the problem are her tease hour shows and her recent "night show" although her tease hour shows have been better than some of the newer girls recently.

It is hardly Lucy's fault if Studio66 schedule her for a late show - obviously she's going to take it for the money as it's her livelihood after all. The way in which the camera quickly panned away from her when she accidentally slipped suggests she made it clear she would remain clothed. If that is what she wants then fair enough. Perhaps the criticism should be with the studio for scheduling her for something which was inappropriate for her at this time and for not hiring enough night time girls.

(18-11-2014 18:43 )Lucy-Anne Wrote:  I do interact with my "fans"

You bunch aren't fans lol your critics.

And I have one word for the daytime tease.... OFCOM.

Give me strength !!!!.

Lucy Ann is giving a performance in a public arena to an adult audience.

This forum and other threads are a comment on the performances of the girls.

We are not commenting on what Lucy-Ann does in private or her character. That would be totally wrong !!!!!!.

In my opinion and others her "performance" was not very good and the worst I have seen this year..............easy.

If an actor's performance is bad on stage or a cinema film they read them and contemplate ??. They don't say the newspaper, magazine or review show be closed down.

Moderators in this forum must not stop performance criticisms.



S

(18-11-2014 18:43 )Lucy-Anne Wrote:  I do interact with my "fans"

You bunch aren't fans lol your critics.

And I have one word for the daytime tease.... OFCOM.

Seems a bit harsh Lucy. Whilst I can understand you being upset with some of the recent posts they are a lot of comments on this thread that are very positive and supportive of your work.

^^^ That's very true. Lucy Anne has had a very easy ride on this forum over the years and deservedly so - she looks great and usually puts on first class day shows. The 'cruel speculation' (her words) that has arisen recently amounts to:

1. The fact that she's started pulling a daft fish face in order to look sexy when she doesn't need to.

2. She put on a very poor 'night' show recently from 10pm to 1am which shouldn't have gone ahead. She is not a night girl.

3. She's heavily into leeching guys for cash through so called 'findom' (financial domination). I personally despise this and if you decide to do it as a career move you'd better be prepared to take the flak.

I really hope something is done about this financial domination :-( its not a fetish its theft. If a guy was doing it to a woman there would be uproar. Or when people take advantage of folk less fortunate than them, I would liken this to people ripping off older people for work that they don't need done. When it becomes a serious issue, which at some point in the future it will (guaranteed it will appear in a newspaper in the next year, some guy will give away a ridiculous amount, remember the guy who ran up the £125k bill?), will the channels be liable? As they do have a duty of care to there customers. Sorry for posting this on Lucys thread if she isn't doing it, I will be gutted if she is because she has been my favourite girl for years :-(

She is doing it, which is why I mentioned it two pages ago with examples of her tweets. It seems to be a major part of her activities:

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1571032

^ I am gutted, still it is one less girl to ring! Which will save me some cash :-) ty Dave.

I've no real problem with how Lucy-Anne has responded given all the flack she's had over the past few days. She's entitled to give her response to it. Do think she was wrong to ask for this thread and anything else on here to be deleted because people on here are entitled their opinion. Lucy-Anne instead should just report any posts she doesn't like to the mods and let them decide what to do.

As for financial domination that she and other babeshow babes do, I've no problem with it because Lucy-Anne or any other babeshow babe aren't forcing people to do it. If people want to buy babeshow babes something, that's fine with me. They just need to make sure they can afford to do it and not rack up a huge debt

(19-11-2014 18:35 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  As for financial domination that she and other babeshow babes do, I've no problem with it because Lucy-Anne or any other babeshow babe aren't forcing people to do it. If people want to buy babeshow babes something, that's fine with me. They just need to make sure they can afford to do it and not rack up a huge debt

Really? I despair at how far you will go to defend the babes.