BS Restrictions

(16-07-2024 22:02 )marlowe Wrote:  He has given up already. The current restrictions in place on Babestation mean that there is no longer anything for him to report.

Which is why the restrictions were introduced. To put a stop to his reporting.

Mary Whitehouse v Mary Millington all over again. I reckon it's Mr. Mann.

I remember S66 making the point to Ofcom that the complaints they were facing at the time were all the work of one person. It's interesting that Arura seems to know for sure that this is the same guy.

Are the Babes ever going to get naked again?.

(02-09-2024 21:30 )Kingsmind Wrote:  Are the Babes ever going to get naked again?.

Maybe if BS wake up to the fact. There are a lot of guys out there that no longer watch the channel for the no nudity rule.

On a similar topic. Have you noticed that our regular video posters have not been putting out many videos lately. KerrAvon and Danzig obviously believe it's not worth putting out most of the below par performances we've seen of late. What they are now doing is repeating old videos of Ashlyn Shaw and a few others. It would seem that currently they have not been earning from the adverts that sometimes plague their videos, so are regurgitating old material to top up the coffers.

(03-09-2024 01:31 )derekdas Wrote:  On a similar topic. Have you noticed that our regular video posters have not been putting out many videos lately. KerrAvon and Danzig obviously believe it's not worth putting out most of the below par performances we've seen of late. What they are now doing is repeating old videos of Ashlyn Shaw and a few others. It would seem that currently they have not been earning from the adverts that sometimes plague their videos, so are regurgitating old material to top up the coffers.

For the record, you're only half right in my case. Free video hosting is unfortunately rarely ad free, and I don't (or won't) pay any premium to get rid of them. I always suggest using something like uBlock Origin to get of them and to surf the internet a lot more safely in general. In my case I never draw any money out of it. I just want to put video content on the forum for record, as especially now it's not being done as much as it used to (when people were able to hoard their vast collections). I've actually been posting a lot of built up recordings that I've never had chance to upload before I purge them from my laptop to reclaim space.

But back on subject, where you are right is that many shows now aren't worth the effort to post. I can leave the shows to record when I'm asleep or out and often find myself deleting the whole night lol. The restrictions actually don't affect many girls who only go through the motions anyway but clearly affects and even annoy the ones that remember it's an 'erotic' show. Beth has been doing enough to still put on a show but even she can only go so far.

After looking on my recordings for when they did get naked , i realised that the Babes wasn't getting naked as much as you think , minus Beth who was getting naked all the time , it was only Kartel who got naked.

I literally went though 10 all night recordings in the month of June because i was bored and literally no one got naked until i got to Amy Lacey who was naked in the alley set and there is only about 4 or 5 of the same Babes that was on anyway.

(03-09-2024 11:23 )Kingsmind Wrote:  After looking on my recordings for when they did get naked , i realised that the Babes wasn't getting naked as much as you think , minus Beth who was getting naked all the time , it was only Kartel who got naked.

I literally went though 10 all night recordings in the month of June because i was bored and literally no one got naked until i got to Amy Lacey who was naked in the alley set and there is only about 4 or 5 of the same Babes that was on anyway.

Whilst the majority of the current crop available atm I would agree wouldn't go naked. But I can name many who will and did many times.
Lori, Ashlyn, Bella, Nichole, Sarah Louise, Brooksie Brooks, Atlanta and the list goes on.