Ofcom Discussion

Right now on a channel calling itself 'E! Entertainment' there's a show called 15 Most Shocking Acts of Violence. Can ANYONE here explain to me why, if Ofcom are so concerned about growing kids and 'harmful' content, they continue to ignore these kinds of programmes?? This is the real filth on our television screens these days, but Ofcom like the perverted fucking cunts they are seem to think it's perfectly fine and acceptable to allow kids to veg on endless images of fictional and real violence

Stan the reason that programme is ok is because it doesn't cause any sexual arousal, that's the crux of the matter, allways has been and allways will. It's clear to see that Ofcom haven't done their job right from day 1, just look at the total lack of erotic material on SKY TV, nothing, just comedy, sport and violence. Going back to an earler point I made I am even questioning the need for the Adult Channels to be age restricted in the first place because sex is a totally natural thing from growing up during adolescence right through to the rest of our lives. Watching Adult channels has been proven beyond all doubt that it causes no any real harm in the rest of Europe except this country. Ofcom doesn't like erotic channels and will continue to rid this country of them one by one until we've got nothing left.

Reminds me of when sex shop licencing and R18 first came out. Even with freeze frame it wasnt possible to see anything explicit. Sex shops were permitted to have a high concentration of sex themed content, but not actually allowed anything explicit. These days we have sex channels without sex.

ofcom seem to think that violence is ok sex is not, from games on x box to violence in coronation street, you can punch someones lights out and show it (you tube included without age verification) ,pepper your opponent with an oozie in a video game , but full rontal nudity ? heaven forbid, it kind of has a mirror image on the saying and perhaps it should be changed "to make war not love " no wonder the whole world is fucked up , seems every leader wants a conflict but not :a wank !

thanks ofcom
you`ve completely won the day,all the shows are boring tedious and just how you want them

The importance of protecting society



(with thanks to The Metro 2/4/2012)

(15-04-2012 13:19 )fedup Wrote:  What ofc@unts are saying is its wrong to show female genatalia on UK tv,,that is all i get back from emails..They say a females genital lips are illegal to be shown unless medicall..So Daddy Daycare can show toddlers and babys male genatalia and close up too but no female genatalia.Thats is my biggest fucked off rant ..So in the beginning they could have said no close ups of penises are allowed and close ups or shots of penises with the foreskin pulled back are not allowed as its extremly explicit..But no in the beginning some twathead said its illegal to show fanny lips never mind even the showing of OPENING the fanny lips to see the vaginal hole or urethra..It discriminates genatalia saying all women should be disgraced at what they have between their legs and get it removed..So pised with these ofc@nts and have found this to read which rants about intodays WE ARE IN IT TOGETHER how come oftwats have BIG wages..

Sorry heres that link to this thing i read,,i skimmed read it but get the idea.Start about 2nd paragraph down.

http://collymore.blog.co.uk/2012/02/21/o...-12866007/

I don't know where you see all these penises, fedup. You must have to go searching for them, because I never come across them in the course of casual TV watching. But in any case your angle of argument seems off to me. No one's going to believe a ranter (who frequents a forum set up to focus on TV softcore porn!) is going to want to see female genitalia shots shown on TV purely in the interests of equality or out of some sense of outrage on behalf of women who are somehow being made to feel genitally ashamed. Also, your choice of mocking labels ("ofc@nts" "twathead(s)") seems telling, and ought to be more thoughtfully selected. Why never "dickface" or "knobhead"?

(15-04-2012 15:31 )Addison Wrote:  I don't know where you see all these penises, fedup. You must have to go searching for them, because I never come across them in the course of casual TV watching. But in any case your angle of argument seems off to me. No one's going to believe a ranter (who frequents a forum set up to focus on TV softcore porn!) is going to want to see female genitalia shots shown on TV purely in the interests of equality or out of some sense of outrage on behalf of women who are somehow being made to feel genitally ashamed. Also, your choice of mocking labels ("ofc@nts" "twathead(s)") seems telling, and ought to be more thoughtfully selected. Why never "dickface" or "knobhead"?

I think you work for ofcom bloody well convinced cause every time your on here you defend them. Since i am fighting against ofcom and their ban on female genatalia i am hardly going to use male genatalia names..Right this year party paramedics,my daughter the teenage naturist,8hrs easter friday on Quest freeview 38 in daytime loads of penises,on and on penises shown ..I am pissed off with oftwats pixellating out,filming from behind or totalling cutting out of hundreds of programmes real life vaginas..My fights been over 25 years where in the same god damn shot the minute a womens slightly opens her legs its fucking banned yet same time penis is shown in full.This is leading to the babestation problems..Why can a women tune into UK tv and see penises but men never can unless medical?? We all know it goes on and and its fully proven that ofcom are sexist.