Emily Dean - Chat /Discussion

speedybert Wrote:

tsurugi Wrote:here is the link now tell me that isn't the exact post i made on here and talk about ass kissing

http://www.bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=...1&t=145391

Just read that and PMed you beforehand because I thought it was you.

It isn't me BTW!!

Strangely enough all the other posts from this morning have gone including the statement from admin.Would be interesting to know what is going on.

It's certainly very weird. I'm checking the thread on bgafd regularly and Emily's insisting that all she did this morning was to request that her account was deleted. Admin here refused so Emily threatened to take it further. That was when admin deleted the account and then put out a bogus story regarding Emily becoming abusive.

Now Emily as a personality seems to have two modes: pleasant and smiley or a screeching, swearing lunatic. As we've found out here, it doesn't take much to trigger the lunatic persona (the merest questioning of her tattoos will do).

Therefore at this stage I'm still minded to favour admin's account over Emily's. However, I think a further statement from admin should be forthcoming because Emily's not letting it drop for the moment and she says she has emails to prove her case.

My question to Emily would be: why would admin lie? What's in it for him?

well frank gallagher is not me just find it strange why someone would post my exact words on bgafd

Digital Dave Wrote:

speedybert Wrote:

tsurugi Wrote:here is the link now tell me that isn't the exact post i made on here and talk about ass kissing

http://www.bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=...1&t=145391

Just read that and PMed you beforehand because I thought it was you.

It isn't me BTW!!

Strangely enough all the other posts from this morning have gone including the statement from admin.Would be interesting to know what is going on.

It's certainly very weird. I'm checking the thread on bgafd regularly and Emily's insisting that all she did this morning was to request that her account was deleted. Admin here refused so Emily threatened to take it further. That was when admin deleted the account and then put out a bogus story regarding Emily becoming abusive.

Now Emily as a personality seems to have two modes: pleasant and smiley or a screeching, swearing lunatic. As we've found out here, it doesn't take much to trigger the lunatic persona (the merest questioning of her tattoos will do).

Therefore at this stage I'm still minded to favour admin's account over Emily's. However, I think a further statement from admin should be forthcoming because Emily's not letting it drop for the moment and she says she has emails to prove her case.

My question to Emily would be: why would admin lie? What's in it for him?

Well said.I have PMed admin about this.I too feel that admin has no reason to lie.Mind you Neil has got involved too and is just digging a big hole for himself.Using his logic 80% of the models who post on here aren't who they say they are which could also mean that it's not Emily or me or who or WTF..................

I am Spartacus!!

The "screeching,swearing lunatic"also made an appearance on Neil's forum last year as well before deciding that she loved him really.Would hate to get on the wrong side of her.

I don't know this Neil, but he strikes me as a bit of an old fool to get involved in this. As speedybert says, he's just digging a big hole for himself.
He said for example that Emily was being logged in here when she wasn't using the forum, but when her name came up the other day I looked at her profile and it hadn't been logged in for months (can't remember exactly but it was early October I think). So this Neil's a proven liar on that point at least.
Hasn't he ever heard that when you're in a hole the best thing to do is stop digging? Mind you I can't understand why his judgement was so lacking to get involved in this in the first place.

Digital Dave Wrote:Now Emily as a personality seems to have two modes: pleasant and smiley or a screeching, swearing lunatic. As we've found out here, it doesn't take much to trigger the lunatic persona (the merest questioning of her tattoos will do).

Therefore at this stage I'm still minded to favour admin's account over Emily's.

In my humble opinion, the key point in what admin said is that Emily is banned from the forum and apparently she was using another account here too which was also banned. Whether she requested this or not is neither here or there, the salient point is that she is banned and if she creates accounts under other names in the future or gets people to do it for her they will surely be deleted. I trust the admin here 100% and if he says that Emily is banned then I am quite sure that she is banned.

Yes, if admin says Emily is banned then I'm quite sure she is definitely banned.

Personally I hope that she DID REQUEST it, because in that case she has no excuse whatever for using 'bennysbrother' type accounts to access or communicate with the forum.

Who cares anymore. Leave the ass kissers to do what they do best and kiss the babes ass on their forums.

Sure, Emily is a great looking girl, but with all the fuss kicked up around her then surely it's a good thing that she no longer uses the forum? (whether banned, deleted or whatever) and from what i've seen she hardly did use this anyway.

At the end of the day, there's plenty more to this forum than one girl so I think we should just drop it and get on with what we all enjoy doing! Too much time has already been wasted on what is really not a major issue. If anything does need to be done then i'm sure Admin and the people involved have it all under control.

Back to the pussy!

cosmonaut Wrote:I don't know this Neil, but he strikes me as a bit of an old fool to get involved in this. As speedybert says, he's just digging a big hole for himself.
He said for example that Emily was being logged in here when she wasn't using the forum, but when her name came up the other day I looked at her profile and it hadn't been logged in for months (can't remember exactly but it was early October I think). So this Neil's a proven liar on that point at least.
Hasn't he ever heard that when you're in a hole the best thing to do is stop digging? Mind you I can't understand why his judgement was so lacking to get involved in this in the first place.

And now the entire thread has been removed from BGAFD.

A few weeks back Neil had posted on BGAFD to recruit models to join his forum. This was his recruitment message with a thinly veiled attack on this forum:

"Its not as many people seem to think that I have something against porn, far from it, I love it. I just think that a glamour model has the right to just do glamour without being pressured to go further thats all. And constant demands for her to do so are just tiresome.

Anyway, for models what my Forum brings, glamour or adult, is a place where they can chat to fans safely without fear of being disrespected, or having their copyright photos stolen."


I asked the following question:


"Who is applying the pressure on Glamour Models to go further than their current levels?

Who is it that is making the “ constant demands “

Is it the Talent Agents? Is it the Pornographers? Is it peer pressure from other Glamour Models who have decided to pursue a career in Hardcore?"

The owner of http://www.ukvixens.com and http://www.black-vixen.com then said:

"Nobody is, he's just putting up a straw man to knock down and be the hero !"
and
"Thank fuck you're here to protect them then hey ?!"

So I guess that sums up Neil's involvement.

(All here: http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=5&i=98711&t=98711 )


And this was Neil's view on this forum from yesterdays thread:

Author: NeilUK
Date: 03-17-09 20:51

"Vostok , every time you post it just shows you up for what you are. You obviously have no respect for anyone. With the shit Emily has faced on that Forum frankly if that is all she said you all got off lightly.

You are obviously a member of that Forum who is quite frankly being fooled every day of your life. 80% of the "models" on their aren't them! As Emily has already said she was being logged in when it wasn't her.

If I you were you I would reserve your anger for the people fooling you into thinking models are members there. Some are, true , but not many are actually them. Of the genuine ones they are only there to promote themselves and more likely check for copyright theft.

The Forum you are supporting here is a photo sharing, password sharing site which is on the radar of a lot of PaySite owners. I'd keep a low profile if I were you!"

Vostok, you did a great job in defending the website on BGAFD. I actually tried too aswell saying that the majority of people on here don't slag off the girls at all. The thread has now been pulled so I don't know if she seen it. Anyway, Emily and Neil didn't half try to plug that Modelling website during that thread?