Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion

2 hours 45 of American stuff....are we running low on British girls? I will start watching again once the majority of the output is not American of Killertame.

(08-12-2010 19:26 )SCIROCCO Wrote:  2 hours 45 of American stuff....are we running low on British girls? I will start watching again once the majority of the output is not American of Killertame.

Killergram stuff is relatively tame in even it's uncut form from what little i've seen of it. Even if it's on the shelves at the dvd shop now i don't pick it up, pumpkin, relish and rude brittania would have been a far better bet.

The live show with angel and tina though (and lolly thrown in) was worth five quid of anyone's money though especially with the ree and reede scene on the same night.

(28-10-2010 03:35 )IanG Wrote:  

(26-10-2010 19:54 )blackjaques Wrote:  

(24-10-2010 10:23 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Why does so-called 'Xtreme' refuse to show penetration, fellatio etc.? I thought they were licensed in the Netherlands? And if, for whatever reason, they still wish to abide by Ofcon censorship, why show non-penetrative masturbation and, to a lesser extent, cunnilingus, given that these constitute 'real sex', and would therefore receive an R18 from the BBFC, and hence be prohibited from broadcast by Ofcon?

There is more than enough evidence to alledge that Ofcon collude with the broadcasters to allow a certain amount of explicitness.

Full on penetration and full on fellatio are the two great no-no's though.
I believe that if the output on TVX, Playboy et al were submitted to BBFC, then every night, at some point,it would receive an R18 cert for the broadcasts. A lot of it is dross, I concur, but it would still get R18 for certain scenes.

It's all a huge con!!

Indeed. But the con isn't solely restricted to the illegal ban on R18-type material. The 'reason' given to ban R18-type material is that some under eighteens can access and even purchase adult rated material.

Of course, the BBFC (in consultation with the public) have drawn-up a set of rating guidelines. Any material (e.g. horror, violence, sex, drugs etc.) that is deemed unsuitable for the under eighteens is given an 18 or R18 rating. The Comms Act says OFCOM are to protect the under eighteens - full stop. So, if OFCOM can't protect the under eighteens from R18-type material without banning it then, they cannot protect the under eighteens from ANY OTHER 18+ rated material without banning that also.

So, there's the REAL con. There's is no need, no necessity, no reason whatsoever to ban any other 18+ rated material despite the PUBLIC and BBFC doing their bit to protect under eighteens from exposure to drugs, violence, adult themes, explicit language etc. etc. etc..

And let's face it, the piss poor shite that gets passed off as 'adult sex material' isn't really suitable for 10 year-olds is it? No. So, if OFCON can claim to be protecting children from the 18+ rated 'OFCOMcore' 'adult sex material' with their mandatory PIN bollox (despite their so-called reaserch showing otherwise), there's no reason to prevent adults accessing real adult sex material rated R18 behind the same totally ineffective mandatory PIN.

The fact remains that 18+ rated material containing violence, bad language, sex scenes, adult themes, drug use, murder, rape and robbery etc. goes out unhindered after the 9pm watershed on virtually all FTA channels. Any under eighteen still watching after 10pm will undoubtedly be exposed to this type of adult-only material which, by public consultation with/by the BBFC, has been deemed totally unsuitable for under eighteens to see.

Now, what HARD EVIDENCE do OFCOM possess that PROVES this 18+ rated material is NOT a danger to children (which means the BBFC are redundant) and allow its transmission but, R18-type material is such a danger to BOTH adults and children that they can ban adults access to it? Without such HARD EVIDENCE, OFCOM are in breach of our Fundamental Human Rights and are thus a bunch of FUCKING CRIMINALS - and I've only been saying this for the past 6 years...

I quite like your rants,you seem to think a lot like me `couse I think we are all being treated like school kids by these moron self proclaimed,un-elected,untouchable set of bigots whos only aim in life is to make it more difficult for us to watch whatever we want

I ordered last nights show via my mobile. i sent the text around 1am and didn't get my pin until 10.30 this morning, will it work for tonight's show

I have not been following the progress of this channel over the last few months how come they promoting the nights at 3 quid a pop

Wow, that looks absolutely sensational!

Last nights show was as confusing as usual, 2 stunning girls really going for it in full close up and then tame as hell as soon as there is a chance of penetration. The cunnilingus is full on hard core, as is the rimming so why no dildo action. A lot of do gooders would see rimming as far more disgusting than a bit of clam lapping...

The two things they cant show is erections and penetrations, everything else is game on.

(12-12-2010 17:25 )Larny Boy Wrote:  The two things they cant show is erections and penetrations, everything else is game on.

and who told you this m8,because as far as I know what is shown is more than you would get on any of the other channels that have the audacity to call themselves uncensored porn channels,basicaly they are all f*cking shite and the lot of them are spineless backstabbing gits who would rather report each other to ofc*nt rather than fight the bast*rds.They are all interested in 1 thing alone and that`s our` hard `earned money and that hard is the only thing hard that you will see.lol

(12-12-2010 17:25 )Larny Boy Wrote:  The two things they cant show is erections and penetrations, everything else is game on.

One problem of showing erections & penetration is that Ofcon would not be allowed to discriminate between hetro & homo sexual activity.
The religious nutcases would have apoplexy if gay porn was also shown uncensored.