Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion

[quote='blackjaques' pid='708647' dateline='1293692994']
I think that Ofcon also warned Babestation that their "Extreme" channel was too explicit, hence they had to tone it down.
Ofcon have done this before with other subscription channels.
[/quote

]You think or you know? confirm please!

I don't know anything , but i think Ofcom have warned Cellcast about the explicitness of this channel as well , it seems very strange how over night it became very tame , explicit scenes that have previously been shown are now shown in a very tame edited version , i wonder if it has got anything to do with the night when according to people on this forum the first 20 mims of one of the live shows was broadcast a few weeks ago unencrypted by mistake showing close up pussy licking ? .

So it looks like Ofcom may be responsible if Xtreme looses viewers.

Xtreme may be better to just show their show on the internet, in an unedited version.

Well, I guess I'm just banging the same drum as everyone else. I first watched Extreme about 3 weeks ago, Reede was on with Lolly - it was excellent; you could see that a line was drawn (basically once dildos were used), but apart from that it was reasonably explicit in a pleasant way. Since then I've watched about half a dozen times and it has got steadily less and less explicit - "crafty" hide-all camera angles, no lingering pussy shots, etc, etc. And last night it was so tame/poor that I shan't be parting with five quid again in the near future.

I don't know if this is self-censorship or if Babestation are being leaned on by somebody, but "Extreme" it isn't.

I can understand a wish to keep adult material away from children or peole who don't want to see that kind of thing, but, for heaven's sake, it's an encrypted channel, you have to make an effort to watch it, and it's on after midnight. Taking that into account, I feel that there is no reason on earth why explicit content should not be the norm. There is a market for it and it's not doing anyone any harm - an RSI in the wrist area is about the worst effect it is likely to have on anyone

If it is self-censorship, then BS really need to have second thoughts, because they will find themselves seriously out of pocket if things don't pick up again.

And while I'm whinging, how can OFCOM justify their stance on erotic entertainment when they routinely allow depraved sadism and gratuitous violence on mainstream channels - the "crossbow cannibal", or whatever he called himself, didn't have a wardrobe full of wank vids, but he did have plenty of "horror" films - or "thrillers" as we are now euphemistically supposed to call them.

I doubt very much that straight eroticism ever inspired a killer or rapist.

(30-12-2010 12:01 )mr mystery Wrote:  I don't know anything , but i think Ofcom have warned Cellcast about the explicitness of this channel as well , it seems very strange how over night it became very tame , explicit scenes that have previously been shown are now shown in a very tame edited version , i wonder if it has got anything to do with the night when according to people on this forum the first 20 mims of one of the live shows was broadcast a few weeks ago unencrypted by mistake showing close up pussy licking ? .

Yer still only thinking mate

(30-12-2010 11:47 )nailpouchofmine Wrote:  [quote='blackjaques' pid='708647' dateline='1293692994']
I think that Ofcon also warned Babestation that their "Extreme" channel was too explicit, hence they had to tone it down.
Ofcon have done this before with other subscription channels.
[/quote

]You think or you know? confirm please!

It's just a theory, that's all.
Why would a channel who are people are talking about in a positive way, suddenly censor their output?

It's no commercial decision, that's for sure.

They must have lost a fair bit of business since their tameness started.

I am lead to believe that Ofcon are in dialogue with broadcasters on a fairly regular basis. Don't know if this is true, mind.

Ofcon do not want sexually arousing content on Uk television.
They do their best to restrict it, that's for sure. The broadcasters just take it up the bum when Ofcon come a calling.

you would think that babestation would sell the vids on the website
like pay £5 by paypal and get 1 or 2 vids to download
come on babestation think of the mony you would make

(31-12-2010 23:06 )alexfury Wrote:  you would think that babestation would sell the vids on the website
like pay £5 by paypal and get 1 or 2 vids to download
come on babestation think of the mony you would make

thats a mighty fine idea alex...that way you can pick the girls that you want without the dross that you dont

tiffany and amanda should do a vid

The Reede/Lolly live show looks like it was amazing, shame I missed it. I should check out the channel more often, the Camilla and Amanda solo shows look great too.

I missed Cherry and Sugar too, this channel really has gotten better. Thanks for the excellent caps showing me what I've missed, think I should stop going any further back.