The Freeview vs Sky content debate

the flithiest hour comment could actually be referring to their peak viewing time, since thats when most peeps aer likely to watch, before heading to bed to be up for work in the morning........ thats almost like paranoia kickin in there vila

I think there's a difference between 'filthiest' and 'busiest'.

or that they wanna be at their filthiest when they're busier..... makes sense really

vila Wrote:

Big Boobies Wrote:the caption says that its a treat from Babestation for the suffering Sky viewers. BUT what about us Freeview viewers; surely we are being deprived.

So they acknowledge the watering-down of the content and obviously realise they are upsetting their customers but STILL they don't explain WHY they're doing it

Another theory: they are waiting for the Participation TV consultation and want to demonstrate good behaviour so they can say in their submission that they put babestation into 48% of households (FV) and the world didn't end.

I don't think the difference in the content is a 'debate' at all. This site is littered with pics/vids-or-it-didn't-happen evidence. 'Naughty' is banned from post midnight TV ... I mean WTF! Genuinely laughing at this.

I like the paranoid 'It's sky trying to sell more sky' conspiracy 'cause I just love that paranoia stuff. Maybe partyland is a water-tester in terms of licence revocation possibilities; it's pretty new, if it gets pulled, who cares? Babestation is the big channel and they won't risk anything that could get the whole thing shut down?

SomeGeek Wrote:I like the paranoid 'It's sky trying to sell more sky' conspiracy 'cause I just love that paranoia stuff.

You gotta love a good Babe Show conspiracy theory.
I heard that the Apollo 11 moon landing was filmed not on the moon, not inside a hangar in Nevada but actually on the bum of Debbie from (Debbies dungeon) Real Wives live channel 952.

seriously...is it really worth all this talk?
has anything any1 has said in any of these threads made a blind bit of difference?
is it really that important an issue?
would u put in this much effort discussing the possibilities to ending world debt, resolving famine, tackling crime?
but get a couple of girls not showing u enough tittage to satisfy u and its endless?

far too much time master debating, when u could perhaps be better off spending a bit more time dropping the 'de' and getting rid of sum pent up frustration

when does it get to a point when eventually a subject is deemed effectively futile?

and before the usual "our right" or "freedom of speech" posse get the wind up their sails...i am merely using my "freedom of speech" to exercise "my right" to question the ultimate necessity in all this needless and pointless waffle

MrSooky Wrote:would u put in this much effort discussing the possibilities to ending world debt,

http://blogsjc.wordpress.com/tag/third-world-debt/

Quote:resolving famine,

http://minekey.com/topic/Famine

Quote:tackling crime?

http://policingpledge.direct.gov.uk/index.html

Quote:but get a couple of girls not showing u enough tittage to satisfy u and its endless?

http://www.babeshows.co.uk

kudos for the linking...but point being?

i just want to make sure its clear

MrSooky Wrote:kudos for the linking...but point being?

I was providing the avenues to discuss the global financial crisis, famine relief, crime prevention and "needless and pointless waffle" about boobs and babe shows.