Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion

join and get the high quality stream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(15-07-2011 22:31 )DonnaDukesFan Wrote:  

(15-07-2011 22:25 )Broncobilly Wrote:  We all know the content is tame but look across the 900 channels no one is pushing any limits

Do you even read the thread before moaning about people complaining? We're moaning about the quality of the webstream.

One of your favourites, Dionne is barely visible on the webstream.

So, instead of your pointless " stop your moaning, you're all so negative " why don't you go on the website, try watching Dionne for 5 minutes and come back and tell us all what you think.

(15-07-2011 22:41 )cathybarry Wrote:  join and get the high quality stream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you shouting, begging, or asking?

Either way, whats the incentive to pay for such a priveledge?

If if slipped your notice, I need a good wank tonight but these poor streams look like someone filming the proper stream off a dusty screen with their mobile phone. RLC can't have bought their equipment from a well known electrical store to be this poor quality


I'll have to go the dogging park instead at this rate.

(15-07-2011 22:41 )cathybarry Wrote:  join and get the high quality stream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So now if someone goes to the website they will definitely not be phoning the girls, simply because its too much hassle to sort out the membership first then to ring in, basically paying £10 to have a decent picture is not even worth it. Would much rather spend £5 on BSX and spend a little more ringing in for naked BS. No videos, now there will be no decent caps, soon no more.... Its not like RLC are really attracting the callers atm except for really popular girls like TJ. Whats funny is that other companies cant even charge for a nude webstream because there werent enough ppl buying and you think you can charge for just a tame show.

So is it a tenner just for the stream or does the site have other content?

(16-07-2011 08:31 )gazfc Wrote:  So is it a tenner just for the stream or does the site have other content?

Raunchy exclusive videos and photos of the Red Light girls, apparently

Let's be honest here. Time's are difficult at the moment for most people. Unless you scrounge off your mum or have a well paid job, then you're NOT going to pay for this service.

I'm neither of the above. I have a mortgage to pay off, a car to keep on the road, and food to put on the table. So spending £9.95 a month for a tame, semi nude show doesn't make any sense, nor does it particularly appeal to me.

So if Cathy, Mellie, a playboy bunny, or Hugh Hefner want to come on and give me more insentive to sign up then I'd like to hear it. What's more is, why don't you offer a trial basis? It would give customers a bigger incentive to sign up by showing them the quality of the webstream and the quality of other perks. The £9.95 a month is only if you're willing to keep paying that sum for a lengthy period of time without being able to cancel the subscription. If you want the service for one month only then the price is actually £19.95.

Doesn't make any sense at all to me. I won't be signing up unless I'm given a decent reason why I should.

This place is going to be staved aswell. I can't imagine many people on here would want to sign up, then come back and share caps (or 8 week old videos). So thats less interest on this forum, and less interest for RLC.

You have to hand it to them, RLC are doing a great job of alienating viewers.

(16-07-2011 10:38 )DonnaDukesFan Wrote:  This place is going to be staved aswell. I can't imagine many people on here would want to sign up, then come back and share caps (or 8 week old videos). So thats less interest on this forum, and less interest for RLC.

You have to hand it to them, RLC are doing a great job of alienating viewers.

Not half. I won't even be bothering to check the streams from now on. You've got porn readily available for free all over the Internet, you've got other babe channels as alternatives. This doesn't make any sense. If they want to make themselves obsolete they're going the right way about it!

I think RLC are saying it's a bandwidth problem and the high quality stream uses too much to run it for free.

(16-07-2011 13:15 )aaron Wrote:  I think RLC are saying it's a bandwidth problem and the high quality stream uses too much to run it for free.

(27-05-2011 09:52 )gazfc Wrote:  Good idea but cant see it lasting, the bandwidth alone must be costing a small fortune

Oh it's already been said but the music thing needs to dealt with


Also how about making your streams compatible with the 21st century and make them iPhone/iPad compatible