Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(05-01-2016 13:01 )ShandyHand Wrote:  At 66 for example, why is the 'flagship' channel resolutely one babe per session..?

The list of possible reasons could be quite lengthy. Here are some.

Studio 66 simply want the best of both worlds. They want a multiple presenter channel as that concept works well for them, but they also want to appeal to those viewers who are more likely to call a single presenter channel. Why does News Corporation own both The Sun and The Times newspapers?

The optimum strategy for a channel high on the EPG might be considered to be quite different to that for a lowly placed channel. What's considered to work best on Sky 941 might not be considered the best move for Sky 912. In fact 941 is not only lowly it's almost at the very bottom of the EPG, so needs a very different approach.

They might want to establish different brands. After all, isn't Sky 912 now branded as S66 and only Sky 941 is Studio 66? Many companies market similar products with different looks in order to expand their reach. Not only that, if at any point a brand starts to lose popularity, the other brand helps to hold their market share.

In other words 912 is the Times to 941's Sun. Yes, that's what I'm saying too; but to encourage more and more Suns by implying it's the only way such 'lowly' channels can survive is not helpful IMO.

However, what you say about one brand helping another actually makes me think that 941 may be helping prop up the 'quality end' of 66's business enabling them to do a old-style presentation there. That is actually an even more depressing thought as, along the same lines, I have heard from a babe (who shall remain nameless) that the cam earnings of some girls are propping up the higher end babes TV appearance fees.

Seems the modern face of the babe show may be facilitating the continuation of the old.

If that is the case, let's hope that the modern face is not considered the only saviour for too long.

Otherwise a trip through the 900s may get even more dull than it is now.

(05-01-2016 14:17 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 13:01 )ShandyHand Wrote:  At 66 for example, why is the 'flagship' channel resolutely one babe per session..?

The list of possible reasons could be quite lengthy. Here are some.

Studio 66 simply want the best of both worlds. They want a multiple presenter channel as that concept works well for them, but they also want to appeal to those viewers who are more likely to call a single presenter channel. Why does News Corporation own both The Sun and The Times newspapers?

i would like to see you proof that it works so well for them or is what you say simple conjecture to back your point,
i find it interesting that you say in a earlier post they they got the idea from XF yet you told me in many posts over and over that 66 had on access to XF's figures so how could they know it worked so well for them ?
i would argue that it was simply born out of necessity not having planed for the long term when they took sins money, and not thought how going down to 2 channels would effect them,

(05-01-2016 14:17 )admiral decker Wrote:  The optimum strategy for a channel high on the EPG might be considered to be quite different to that for a lowly placed channel. What's considered to work best on Sky 941 might not be considered the best move for Sky 912. In fact 941 is not only lowly it's almost at the very bottom of the EPG, so needs a very different approach.

i would agree that its a know fact that channels at the bottom end of the EPG get a lot less viewers but this should not be used as a reason not to try with the show, multi girl channels get less callers when they charge top end prices fact so by using 2 girls on a channel they are making they viewer/caller ship smaller they it should be,

(05-01-2016 14:17 )admiral decker Wrote:  They might want to establish different brands. After all, isn't Sky 912 now branded as S66 and only Sky 941 is Studio 66? Many companies market similar products with different looks in order to expand their reach. Not only that, if at any point a brand starts to lose popularity, the other brand helps to hold their market share.

i would say they would be better off trying to create 1 strong brand they everyone knew what it was about and what they would get which they had done well when they where elite,
as a strong brand would help drive callers/viewers down to 941 which would only help them, if they what to make 941 the sun then they need to reduce the cost of the call and go the xp route but as they are not making that much money at the moment i dont see this as a option

(05-01-2016 15:41 )winsaw Wrote:  i would like to see you proof

It's all conjecture dear boy. I thought that was obvious.

That's why my post began by saying these were possible reasons.

Everything in that post is possible.

(05-01-2016 14:17 )admiral decker Wrote:  They might want to establish different brands. After all, isn't Sky 912 now branded as S66 and only Sky 941 is Studio 66? Many companies market similar products with different looks in order to expand their reach. Not only that, if at any point a brand starts to lose popularity, the other brand helps to hold their market share.

No this isn't the case,
Sky channel 912 is called/branded "Studio 66"
Sky channel 940 is called/branded "Studio 66 2".
Sky Channel 941 is called/branded "Studio 66 3"

(05-01-2016 15:57 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 15:41 )winsaw Wrote:  i would like to see you proof

It's all conjecture dear boy. I thought that was obvious.

That's why my post began by saying these were possible reasons.

Everything in that post is possible.

lol fair enough, nice deflection away from answering the rest of the post, paticurly about XF

(05-01-2016 15:41 )winsaw Wrote:  66 had on access to XF's figures

You're not making any sense.

Krystal derived her income from Studio 66 according to call volume.

It's impossible for Studio 66 not to know the call volumes, otherwise how could they have paid her?

Not to mention that Xtreme Filth had no telephone system of their own. They used Studio 66's telephone system, so it's inevitable that Studio 66 knew what the call levels were. How could it be otherwise?

(05-01-2016 16:01 )Dave_A Wrote:  No this isn't the case,
Sky channel 912 is called/branded "Studio 66"
Sky channel 940 is called/branded "Studio 66 2".
Sky Channel 941 is called/branded "Studio 66 3"

Or according to the programming shown on the EPG:
S66
Studio 66 Cougars
Studio 66

(05-01-2016 16:04 )winsaw Wrote:  nice deflection away from answering the rest of the post

The rest of the post doesn't need answering, because the points listed there are only possibilities. That's why it said possible reasons.

Here's a different idea.....
Would it be worth considering that screen sharing provides further opportunity to give each girl extra screen time, which I'm sure they will ask for and want?
I'm sure for variation sakes it makes good sense for S66 to keep a wide selection of girls available, but keeping them happy with plentiful hours apiece could prove quite tricky I suppose?