Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

I like that idea, Bandwagon.

Consider it a worthy addition to the list of possibilities.

(05-01-2016 15:57 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(02-01-1970 16:20 )winsawi470' Wrote:  i would like to see you proof

It's all conjecture dear boy. I thought that was obvious.

That's why my post began by saying these were possible reasons.

Everything in that post is possible.

But you do concede that, as 66 and others seem to consider the 912-type format worth preserving, it is the superior format for the babe show all other things being equal - in the same way that the Times is a superior source of hard news to the Sun say?

Commercial considerations are open to specilation as you say. I just wondered what you would like to see from the channels in this regard? Do you have an opinion on how it should be done?

66 STILL use the XF branding online btw and all the commercial speculation only applies to the Sky platform of course. Hopefully the channels can break away from the short and curly stranglehold Sky have over their livelihoods and we'll get to see a very different landscape from and for the channels in the next few years.

(05-01-2016 16:17 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 15:41 )winsaw Wrote:  66 had on access to XF's figures

You're not making any sense.

Krystal derived her income from Studio 66 according to call volume.

It's impossible for Studio 66 not to know the call volumes, otherwise how could they have paid her?

Not to mention that Xtreme Filth had no telephone system of their own. They used Studio 66's telephone system, so it's inevitable that Studio 66 knew what the call levels were. How could it be otherwise?

Thank you, how long have I waited for you to say that
All those weeks in the xf thread where you denied the above, so glad u have seen the light,
Yes you are so right xf and 66 where one and the same so they new exactly what there xf brand was making call wise

(05-01-2016 16:51 )ShandyHand Wrote:  I just wondered what you would like to see from the channels in this regard? Do you have an opinion on how it should be done?

As a viewer I dislike the 'multiple presenter' format and I never watch it. I've hardly ever seen Xpanded TV for example, although I have sometimes noticed single presenters on there when flicking through the channels. But I wouldn't repeat over and over again that I dislike multiple presenters, as I prefer to simply not watch that format. Channels can do whatever they think is best for them and I'll view their shows if I choose to.

(05-01-2016 04:06 )mrbates59 Wrote:  Which is why they should frame her in properly (zoom out until it's completely necessary to zoom in) or make the text smaller like Babestation. It isn't rocket science. They literally end up cutting the tops of their heads off half the time.



Now this is framed well.

Not for Babestation it wouldn't be. Because that strip across the top of the screen would cut the top of her head off. The very thing you were complaining about.

(05-01-2016 17:07 )winsaw Wrote:  they new exactly what there xf brand was making call wise

Obviously they did.

I'm not sure why you're so intent on stating the staggeringly obvious, which everyone already knows.

How could they have paid Krystal if they didn't know what call volumes she was making?

How could Studio 66 not know what calls were being received on their own telephone system?

(05-01-2016 17:20 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 17:07 )winsaw Wrote:  they new exactly what there xf brand was making call wise

Obviously they did.

I'm not sure why you're so intent on stating the staggeringly obvious, which everyone already knows.

How could they have paid Krystal if they didn't know what call volumes she was making?

How could Studio 66 not know what calls were being received on their own telephone system?

I am happy you agree with me on this, I am just wondering why there are all those posts in the xf thread where u say the oppersit to that,
To bring this back into context I don't feel that it would give an exact relation between the minutes anyway as I feel xf was aiming at a different market to 66 many of the people who like xf where not 66 fans,
I believe that 3 girl's on a constant rotation with only 2 on screen at any time would give a better amount of call minutes and would also get more people watching 941

(05-01-2016 17:36 )winsaw Wrote:  I believe that 3 girl's on a constant rotation with only 2 on screen at any time would give a better amount of call minutes and would also get more people watching 941

I would prefer this in all honesty.
I suggested earlier in the thread an hour on hour off rotation policy although it doesn't have to be an hour of course.
When different peoples favourites are on I would hazard a guess they might prefer them alone on set unless there are two of their favourites together on screen AND they can do a proper sexually stimulating 2-4-1 with one phone rather than a rather distant and detached looking double babe stint with two phones.


Oh dear I feel a vote thread coming on .
I shall resist .

(05-01-2016 14:17 )admiral decker Wrote:  .
They might want to establish different brands. After all, isn't Sky 912 now branded as S66 and only Sky 941 is Studio 66? Many companies market similar products with different looks in order to expand their reach. Not only that, if at any point a brand starts to lose popularity, the other brand helps to hold their market share.

All 3 Studio 66 Sky channels have recently been re-branded. the Sky channel 912 "S66" branding has know been dropped and changed to "Studio 66 TV".
Iv'e replied to this post again, basically because the last time i replied i wasn't aware that the re branding/service name change of the channels is actually mentioned in Ofcom's latest licensing bulletin that came out today [check it out under Service name changes] http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadca...tes/121215

(05-01-2016 17:36 )winsaw Wrote:  I am just wondering why there are all those posts in the xf thread where u say the oppersit to that,

Well if you can find those posts I'll be happy to discuss them with you. But I'm quite sure they don't exist.

It was a known fact all along that Xtreme Filth were sharing studios with Studio 66 and therefore using the same telephone system. Nobody would ever have argued otherwise.