Snooks
Olympic Champion Keely
Posts: 53,594
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 281
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
The BS roster for me is too big.
There are too many of the same sort of babes on the channel.
I think there is a case for letting some go and focus on quality of stint and performance and dare I say it........ call stats as well .
It is not for me to say who should be let go mainly because I don't have access to the call stats.
I can state my opinion on performances which in general are much of a muchness across the board on BS with a few notable exceptions. But it is ultimately a BS decision and not mine.
I can see the merits of babes from other channels joining BS but only if a number of babes are moved on from the BS roster already in place.
The one thing I would like to see in order to free up more airtime space is 945 being used for more conventional live output rather than catch up repeats.
|
|
28-02-2016 13:44 |
|
M-L-L
The Last Straw
Posts: 11,146
Joined: Sep 2013
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
(28-02-2016 13:44 )snookered147 Wrote: The BS roster for me is too big.
There are too many of the same sort of babes on the channel.
I can see why you might say this.
I don't study the schedules scientifically, but it feels to me like there's a reasonable variety - yes there are some performers on quite regularly but that's always happened ? It doesn't feel to me as bad for that as it's sometimes been in the last couple of years. I can't claim to watch the channels as much as some of the others on here though, so I'm not dogmatic about that, just my opinion.
From a "variety" point of view though, I'd be concerned that a "cull" just ends up squeezing out the slightly different performers in favour of the supposedly "popular" identikit "Stepford Wives" Barbie dolls.
( There's my prejudices out in the open ).
So you'd end up with less perfomers overall, but those that remain are all of a similar type.
I'd have thought that it's potentially better to have many more babes than you might need to use, some of whom are only coming in every couple of weeks or a couple of nights every month or whatever : particularly if they are happy/willing to work "off-and-on" like that and aren't looking for / don't need shifts every week ?
|
|
28-02-2016 13:57 |
|
M-L-L
The Last Straw
Posts: 11,146
Joined: Sep 2013
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
^ Hope nobody needs to use any "angries" in their posts for the next few hours - jimmyt 's gonna exceed his quota.
|
|
28-02-2016 14:00 |
|
winsaw
winsaw is the insider lol
Posts: 34,236
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 216
|
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion
i don't know if the bs roster is to big as a number of the girls on it are what i would class as part time who only want to do a few shifts a month through their choice,
as for Bex signing if she is still on he same money as when at RLC she is only mid table pay wise and is very popular with a good set of regulars so if you run bs you can know with some confidence she will make you a good profit each time she is on,
the likes of Kandi are on a lot more so more of a gamble as you need a lot more calls to make the same percentage of return,
i agree that 945 needs to be used as a normal channel maybe with the web girls in smaller boxes on the side of screen, although i am not sure its working that well as i watched Levi for a bit last night and she was asking for people to call all the time, i guess the problem is people want more from a web show than they are getting when its on tv as well,
currently walking on the Sunny side of the street
Best Cap Poster 2016 & 2017, runner-up 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 & 2023
|
|
28-02-2016 14:01 |
|