MGR
Junior Poster
Posts: 22
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 2
|
RE: Live 960 - Chat & Discussion
(15-05-2010 00:32 )StanTheMan Wrote: Well there's a distinct lack of sparks flying around so far, but the night is still young to be fair, so I'm willing to give it a while longer.
Incidently - and this is not meant to sound flippant - which of these three is the 'original 960 babe'?
Oh, and while you're around MGR, I'd like to put forward a suggestion. I think it's fair to say your channel is 'experimenting' more than most at the moment (which is a very good thing) with things like the afore mentioned pixelcam and giving the girls handhelds to play around with, but how about this? When you have two girls on who, let's say, have a good chemistry, why not allow them to pleasure each other? Now before you point out that such behaviour isn't allowed, I think that probably only applies to what we see on screen. What I'm suggesting here is that all the 'action' happens out of shot, meaning we see one girl from the waist up while the other is down below working away with tongues, toys, etc. I don't think I'm alone in thinking that there are few things more of a turn-on than seeing a girl genuinely aroused. Think about it, if we don't see what's going on out of shot, then no one can prove it was. Only we'll know it was, if you get my drift.
Think it over, you know it makes sense.
Hi Stan
Lexi is the original 960 girl we are welcoming back, maybe because of the time i joined and the great working relationship i had with her, i am extremy happy to see her on our airwaves.
As for your suggestion, i get entirely what you are aiming at and with some research i will see how far we can actualy go. My understanding of the rules is that anything "simulated" needs to be saved for the encrypted channels. Obviously i am up for trying anything out and want to satisfy our viewing audience with as much as we can get away with. But as i stated above, the only way to go about this is on a gradual curve rather than just a balls out approach. Thats why we are experimenting with the different formats and styles. The old addage that if you are going to say anything contriversial, you can usually get away with it if you are doing a charachter. Hopfully we can push the boundries further if we have funny little skits and different segments where the focus is on the fact that it is handheld....the fact that it is naked time, rather than the blatent fact that we are showing pussy etc etc. And it is there. O.k at the moment you have to watch closly to get the shots you are after, the things you want to see. But they are there......allegedly
|
|
15-05-2010 00:52 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Live 960 - Chat & Discussion
(15-05-2010 00:52 )MGR Wrote: And it is there. O.k at the moment you have to watch closly to get the shots you are after, the things you want to see. But they are there......allegedly
Well, the 'shots we're after', as you put it, probably amount to about five seconds out of every week, but I'll give you that. They are there, of sorts.
By the way, tonight just didn't happen, did it? Be honest, MGR. I think you need to re-think your cast list if you're ever going to do this again. I was hoping for three on a bed, during naked time, but it's now four in the morning and it hasn't happened. And the pairing of Jem Stone and Rebecca has displayed no chemistry whatsoever. What's even more worrying tonight is your cameraman's insistance on covering up Rebecca's nether region with the on-screen graphics whenever she pulls those lovely front wedgies. I mean come on. What harm is a bit of lippage for heaven's sake?
(This post was last modified: 15-05-2010 03:03 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
15-05-2010 03:00 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Live 960 - Chat & Discussion
(15-05-2010 00:53 )Digital Dave Wrote: I think that's a good idea Stanley!
It could be something you could suggest to Mr Bluebird directly, he is after all going to be running 960 very shortly.
Noted, DD
|
|
15-05-2010 03:04 |
|