BABESTATION XTREME LAUNCH

(15-04-2010 13:01 )whizzer Wrote:  

(15-04-2010 12:51 )groundnpound Wrote:  All i think everyone on here wants to see is the regular Babestation girls go that little bit further and to be shown what always gets covered up by a pillow or well positioned leg.

Yes I get the impression that's what everyone is saying. I will live in hope.

That's the only thing that would interest me in the channel.
I didn't see the show as I don't have freeview but it sounds as though they didn't really offer anything different from what you can find elsewhere.

(15-04-2010 13:13 )chrislatimer Wrote:  i thought there would be more new content, but half of it was from your website,

It remains to be seen if showing such website content is the plan going forward. This was only the first night after all.

This thread was so active last night, with probably the most amount of people browsing this section of the forum than any other at one time, everytime i refreshed the page a new post was made in this thread. However for something that had so much hype and build up, it didn't deliver from what i read. I didn't see 'Babestation Xtreme' as i don't have freeview, but i doubt i missed much, as every review posted of the show last night was of a negative nature, i swear i didn't see any postive feedback about Babestation Xtreme. Given it was the first show and it was free, i wonder how many people will actually buy into is? Did anyone enjoy the show last night?

I see a few people are trying to give the channel a break by saying its only the first night but in my opinion being the first nite they should have gone all out with new content featuring the current BS girl and got everyones attention, instead what they have done is make it almost imposible for them to get back anyone who watch the first nite in future. they would have to do the same offer again "free" if they actualy do turn the channel around which i very much doubt.

p.s. didnt it say at the start of the thread "we want your input, what do you want to see" something along those lines!! well its unanamous we want 2 see the regular girl "stevie for me" gettin naked i mean they could stick to the exact same format of live calls and it would be a winner im sure....

all i can say id B.S. has been on the site and has not bothered trying to defend last nights show. i cant blame him/her either, i wouldn't have the stones to do it!.
save yer fiver for a topup and phone 1 of the b.s girls instead, its better value.

(15-04-2010 16:11 )Hexit Wrote:  all i can say id B.S. has been on the site and has not bothered trying to defend last nights show. i cant blame him/her either, i wouldn't have the stones to do it!.
save yer fiver for a topup and phone 1 of the b.s girls instead, its better value.

I don't feel we need to defend the channel, personally. We have launched a new show, trying something new, and have asked for our viewers input in what they want to see.

We really do appreciate everyone trying out the channel last night, and appreciate all the constructive feedback we have received.. we are acting on anything which is possible for us to do so, and will build this new channel into a product which everyone enjoys, allowing our viewers to shape the direction of the channel as much as possible (in constraints of UK TV law and girl's individual boundaries).

It would be a very hard task to put out a new channel and get the instant approval of the people on here

(15-04-2010 10:58 )Tintin Wrote:  Is there any chance you could upload it so us sky users can see it??????

Thx

What the hell for, judging by the general consensus on here?

(15-04-2010 16:21 )babestation Wrote:  I don't feel we need to defend the channel, personally.

Given the overall tone of the feedback, I doubt you could defend it to be honest. BSX has imploded on its first night - there is no arguement about that.

(15-04-2010 16:21 )babestation Wrote:  We have launched a new show, trying something new, and have asked for our viewers input in what they want to see.

You launched a new show in tired old format, one already proven to be a non-starter by both TVX and Livexxx very recently. I'm actually astounded that somebody gave this the green light in the first place.

(15-04-2010 16:21 )babestation Wrote:  (We) will build this new channel into a product which everyone enjoys, allowing our viewers to shape the direction of the channel as much as possible (in constraints of UK TV law and girl's individual boundaries).

I think most of us will be aware that hardcore cannot be shown, so that's a given. As for the girls' boundaries, I agree wholeheartedly that they should be respected at all times. However, if not enough of them are willing to expand on their performance, you will need to hire girls that will. It's that simple, or your 'original content' will be the same as BS1/2 and PL.

These rather large implications should have been ironed out prior to broadcast, because now you have an almost impossible task ahead of re-packaging and selling 'damaged goods'. Forget the softcore films we've all seen the hardcore version of and build the product around the girls, because they are your greatest resource. You have fantastic talent including working adult film stars, so get them involved much more.

(15-04-2010 16:21 )babestation Wrote:  It would be a very hard task to put out a new channel and get the instant approval of the people on here

Had the content been better, the task would have been a lot simpler. I'm also a bit confused at your apparent amusement when every comment was negative. If I was anyone involved in last night's nonsense, I would be working around the clock to fix it!

Thank you very much for my nomination in
Best Cap or Cap Set Of The Year 2013
for Dannii Harwood Posts 781 & 782

(15-04-2010 17:05 )Shady Cee Wrote:  Had the content been better, the task would have been a lot simpler. I'm also a bit confused at your apparent amusement when every comment was negative. If I was anyone involved in last night's nonsense, I would be working around the clock to fix it!

every comment on HERE was negative, not every comment was negative.. please remember this forum only represents a very small minority of the channel's viewer base

we of course respect everyone's view on here, and welcome constructive feedback. we have a recruitment team hard at work and our content team is busy making fresh content for the channel, including as many of the Babestation girls as humanly possible.

all we can do is keep improving the channel and hope people will give it time to find it's feet and grow

Well all the hype's over, then new station arrived and...

watched the 1st hour: show actually started with ella (kept pants on of course) - but strange choice for Xtreme? then into a few sets (tammy/rio, lolly/antonia) that I've seen before but with the best bits cut, and lots of views of the backs of girls heads when you knew the real cameraman was getting the decent shots, a few tame strips - Lori took her bra off (although she goes nude on normal tv?)
Apart from some of the girls solo stuff - which wasn't as good as when they're on the normal channels - most of the content is available in higher quality and with the 'missing bits' through a simple google search.

Went to bed at 1 as had work today but left it recording - checked the tape this morning and seems the show cut, mid set, at about 3am so I've got 2 hours of the pin screen - did anyone else have that problem? May be my box resetting itself (although not supposed to) but would have been really pissed off if I'd paid £5 for it.

No presenters, no live girls, no interaction - unless after 3am of course!

Quality was only slightly better than the website - at least full screen with no pixelation but BS really need to send their staff to camera & lighting school - it was rubbish and meant you couldn't really see anything (the only extreme facet of the show was the extremely poor production, same as the website).

I thought it was a strange way to launch a new show - put out crap but with the promise that it'll improve - wouldn't it have been better if they'd put out the best show possible to attract viewers? it's not like its just a new show - its one they want us to pay for.

So bottom line after last night is that it wasn't worth any of the effort and I won't try to watch again. And that means that just like last night where the thread was so busy with the forum trying to help eachother get it, we'll be reliant on the forum to tell us its improved - are BS paying us anything for sorting out their mess & promoting their show? don't think so.

I just wish I'd ignored it and recorded Paige on the other side instead (haven't checked the thread yet but hoping HannahsPet's done his thing again - thanks HP).

Disappointing to think of all the girls they've cleared out to make way for this rubbish - I knew it was gonna be crap and it was.
But should thank BS for giving us a freebie to prove it (after all, it cost me £10 to find out the website was crap)

NB what odds do I get for the show not to last a month?