Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(13-12-2010 15:59 )mrmann Wrote:  But another thing they could do, is change licenses, so we can see some nude 2-4-1s for once. The other channels do them, so why can't Babestation? People keep saying that they have a Dutch license which allows them to do harder material, but that isn't true as Ofcom still rules them. However, they seem to be more strict on 2-4-1s for some reason, yet the solo shows are more full on. I don't get it really.

I doubt the licences need to be changed - we've had nude 2-4-1s in the past. The first I can remember was Cleo and Tammy and I'm sure Camilla and Reede have done a few.

The Dutch licences must have some effect. As I've pointed out before, Ofcom changed the rules with effect from 1 September to prohibit adult sex chat channels from broadcasting on Freeview before midnight, but BS1 still starts at 11pm on FV 96.

Cellcast seem to have a paranoia about 2-4-1s, especially on Freeview, which must be a pain in the arse for those watching Sky during FV hours.

(13-12-2010 21:03 )vila Wrote:  I doubt the licences need to be changed - we've had nude 2-4-1s in the past. The first I can remember was Cleo and Tammy and I'm sure Camilla and Reede have done a few.

The Dutch licences must have some effect. As I've pointed out before, Ofcom changed the rules with effect from 1 September to prohibit adult sex chat channels from broadcasting on Freeview before midnight, but BS1 still starts at 11pm on FV 96.

Cellcast seem to have a paranoia about 2-4-1s, especially on Freeview, which must be a pain in the arse for those watching Sky during FV hours.

Cleo and Tammy were both nude? Hmm, I'll have to look at that moment again. Too bad they won't just let them do their thing like on other channels.

Nice line up tonight though!

(13-12-2010 21:26 )mrmann Wrote:  Nice line up tonight though!

Mostly.

(13-12-2010 22:08 )vila Wrote:  Mostly.

Agreed.

(13-12-2010 23:11 )mrmann Wrote:  

(13-12-2010 22:08 )vila Wrote:  

(13-12-2010 21:26 )mrmann Wrote:  Nice line up tonight though!

Mostly.

Agreed.

Unfortunately I doubt I'll see very much of my two three favourites.

Presumably Georgie's producer doesn't think she's pretty enough for tv, judging by the way he keeps hiding her face behind those boxes.

I just wish the camera would tilt down a bit and zoom out. Maybe it's Georgie's choice to have the shot framed like that, as to not reveal too much if there's a slip.

I really can't believe it could have been Georgie's choice to have the shot framed so that her face was hidden behind those black boxes for half the time.

Edit: I don't understand how it is that they can't see that they're zoomed in too close most of the time. They're ruining Paige's session now - the camera's zoomed in much too close.

Edit 2: Wouldn't you think that by now everyone at BS, even the cameramen, would know what is generally regarded as Paige's best feature? So what do they do? Why, hide it behind a box or off the edge of the screen, of course! What else?

(14-12-2010 02:00 )vila Wrote:  I really can't believe it could have been Georgie's choice to have the shot framed so that her face was hidden behind those black boxes for half the time.

Edit: I don't understand how it is that they can't see that they're zoomed in too close most of the time. They're ruining Paige's session now - the camera's zoomed in much too close.

Edit 2: Wouldn't you think that by now everyone at BS, even the cameramen, would know what is generally regarded as Paige's best feature? So what do they do? Why, hide it behind a box or off the edge of the screen, of course! What else?

It's weird, but her show from a week or so ago was terrific with better camera work, so it must be a different cameraman, or just less relaxed tonight.

tiffany as a presenter what a joke a girl that hott has to go on screen what a waste whats next are bs going to put her on the dayshows plz tiff on the bed not on the mic