nasty piece of work

speedybert Wrote:Having members like surrysub on this forum is what makes it such a good forum.OK granted abusive PMs are out of order if indeed they have been sent/received.

His comment about 1 out of 5 is fine it's hardly nasty.If you think it is then I think that is a tad over sensitive.

He clearly has a sense of humour which like all things is down to personal taste.An example being his comment on website suggestions for Harmony Hex & Cherry.

If you don't like his posts ignore them.What makes a forum good is it's members and their opinions.

Exactly speedybert.

Giving an opinion that he scores someone as a 1 out of 5 (and that is all that it is, an opinion) hardly constitutes being hateful. Stating that he finds a Girl who is pretty much un-animated in her performance compared to another Girl can hardly be considered hateful either.

And agreeing with Deni Tayla’s view that people who phone these channels are losers may well touch a nerve, but perhaps he was trying to highlight the fact that some of the very Girls that we call treat their callers with contempt.

Perhaps he was trying to highlight the fact that Broadcasters who own these channels treat us with contempt, we spend £1.50 per minute to listen to an automated line that doesn’t always connect (there are“Gremlins” on the phone lines as Lola admitted) and sometimes get through to a Girl that can’t even be bothered to talk.

If you read sureysubs posts you will see that he has given praise to many Girls, both working now and in the past. And he has given praise on factors of their performance that he admires, including Tammy Oldham.

I understand where Scotsman is coming from. He seems like a good Guy who comes here to celebrate his favourite Babes.

But I also understand that Sureysub makes posts to highlight and discuss some of the negative aspects of what exists on the 900 channels.

And like his points or not, he creates valid discussion, whereas the poster who started this thread seems to just comment on the fact that he loves Girls feet.

But either way, talking about a foot fetish or talking about negative aspects of the channels is just as valid as the other in the context of this forum.

I find it a little difficult to believe that surreysub sent an “abusive and hateful” PM as suggested. His posting style seems to focus on the sarcastic and straight to the point. Having seen the original comment that RodgertheDodger posted ( about hair ) before it was deleted by Admin, I think Rodger may have considered this post that sureysub made to be the offending article:

Quote: RE: Tammy screenshots
Haven’t seen pubic hair like that since those ropey 1970s German soft porn films that used to be on satellite TV many years ago.

If posting this makes you “A nasty piece of work” then I hope that Keira Pharrell never posts on here since I can remember her saying in a Girl/Girl scene with Tammy: “Jesus! You’ve got more bush than the Australian outback!”.

And as for the other “nasty piece of work” who made mention of Tammy’s eyes, I can’t seem to find these comments either. So I hope Surreysub can return so we can hear the full story.

vostok 1 Wrote:I find it a little difficult to believe that surreysub sent an “abusive and hateful” PM as suggested. His posting style seems to focus on the sarcastic and straight to the point. Having seen the original comment that RodgertheDodger posted ( about hair ) before it was deleted by Admin,

Admin has seen the PMs in question (which therefore do exist - please note the use of the plural here).

Please note that, contrary to what you say, Admin has not removed any posts made by rogerthedodger, nor was Admin aware of any problems or concerns regarding any posts made by rodgerthedodger, other than the one at the top of this thread, which had some words removed from it as is explained there.

Forum Admin

admin Wrote:

vostok 1 Wrote:I find it a little difficult to believe that surreysub sent an “abusive and hateful” PM as suggested. His posting style seems to focus on the sarcastic and straight to the point. Having seen the original comment that RodgertheDodger posted ( about hair ) before it was deleted by Admin,

Admin has seen the PMs in question (which therefore do exist - please note the use of the plural here).

Please note that, contrary to what you say, Admin has not removed any posts made by rogerthedodger, nor was Admin aware of any problems or concerns regarding any posts made by rodgerthedodger, other than the one at the top of this thread, which had some words removed from it as is explained there.

Forum Admin

Thanks for clearing that up Admin.

What I was referring to was the words that have been removed from rodgerthedodger's original post at the start of this thread.

vostok 1 Wrote:What I was referring to was the words that have been removed from rodgerthedodger's original post at the start of this thread.

OK understood, all clear now.

Forum Admin

who is Surreysub is he a bit thick or is the case of he is yet another clown that starts fights on this fourm for no reason at alll

shame

so...does the SUB part of his name mean he's one of those submissive freaks....why not just get one of the girls to TELL him to behave HAHA

Anastasia was online earlier...i could just imagin that oh so sexi foreign accent saying it

"surreysub you will behave now!! your mistress has spoken!"

We need to spread some love here peeps

But good debate should always be welcome....

i understand the hairy bush comments (its like her trademark) but what about her eyes?

firekind Wrote:i understand the hairy bush comments (its like her trademark) but what about her eyes?

When Tammy gets excited and energetic on the beds she can go a wee bit cross eyed.

really? shows she isnt acting i guess lol