Ok so Shandyhand
The reason why I take a tough stance on hate speech is because it affects certain people differently, mainly those who have mental health issues. You and I hear hate speech and we can disagree with it, condemn and ultimately shrug it off but a person who has a mental illness could interpret it very differently. Darren Osborne was incited by Robinson and Britain First and he was on medication for depression. Thomas Mair also suffers ill mental health, his home was found to be stuffed with far right books and Nazi memorabilia. Dylan Roof the Charleston Church shooter who marched in there with a Rhodesia badge on his jacket had mental health problems. As I said, shit does not happen in a vacuum, people with mental health don't just wake up one morning and decide they are white supremacists. I will point out that my Father is a retired Psychotherapist and accredited mental health expert and my sister has a degree in criminal psychology so whilst I am by no means an expert I have talked about these issues with two people who are very much in the know
With regards to the pug it did seem extreme but it should be noted that the judge deemed it not a joke so he was not sentenced on the grounds of making comedy about something and he was not convicted of a hate crime he was convicted of gross offence which is lower on the spectrum. I personally feel it was in very poor taste you don't get to engage in antisemitism and then say it was all just a joke because you have a pug, that is weak sauce
As for the no platforming, the right to free speech does not extend to the right to a platform. We have a right to speak out but we do not have a right to speak at a University, or on the radio or have a column in a newspaper. Most of the instances of no platforming are carried out by private organisations exercising their right to do so. If someone is no platformed at a University it is not an infringement of their freedom of speech, they could go down to the Uni stand an inch outside the grounds and give that speech if they wanted to and nobody would arrest them for it. By contrast our nations public broadcaster has decided to give Nigel Farage a season ticket to Question Time as well as giving Nick Griffin a go
Babefan2012
I am watching the babeshows as I do this, currently looking at Ashley Emma's bare arse after having watched Becky's amazing breasts. I also have uploaded pics of Babeshow babes Macie & Sitara and Maya Jama in British Celebs Section
Actually the number of attacks carried out by Islamic extremists is calculable. Here is a graph of data carried out by Europol showing religiously motivated attacks (not all of which are Islamic) in blue vs non religiously motivated in red, you can see that only a tiny amount are carried out by religious extremists
A similar picture plays out in the United States
The reason why it seems that so many attacks are carried out by Islamic Extremists is because they are co-ordinated and planned over a period of months by groups such a ISIS who have experience in this area so tend to be more affective and have a larger death toll. On top of that studies by Georgia State University have found that Terrorist attacks carried out by Muslims receive 5 times the media coverage as non Muslims as shown in this article
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...20726.html
I would argue against not enough is being done to tackle Islamic terrorism as there are more plots foiled than carried out they just don't get the same amount of coverage. Actually looking at the bar graph above the majority of Islamic terrorist attacks are foiled where as the majority of right wing attacks are not. Also the sex gangs are not an Islamic problem they are Pakistani/Bangladeshi cultural problem. If it was Islam there would be Easter European, Indonesian, Malaysian, African, Middle Eastern sex gangs as the all get taught from the same Qu 'ran but they don't run sex gangs
As I said to Shandyhand Robinsons language does not need to be inflammatory, violent or threatening because hate speech can have the same affect on people with mental health problems as violent speech may have on those without. Robinson is not a free speech advocate questioning the unquestionable he is an agitator, a bigot, a racist, convicted fraudster who as twice pleaded guilty to contempt of court
And now I am on Ella Jolie