(24-02-2014 15:11 )HannahsPet Wrote: if labour had won then there would be no independence vote. its only cos the tories won
Agree with this. The SNP's gain has been from the collapse of Labour UK wide.
The SNP only got a majority in the TSP because of tactical voting dishing out punishment against Labour for TB's disastrous foreign wars legacy and then against Pa Broon being economically useless and charisma-free in power; and also because of tactical voting against the Limp Dems - hitherto the natural party of protest for sitters-on-the-fence - for abandoning their principles and many of their manifesto promises in their eagerness to join in the Coalition gravy train. The SNP victory won't have been due to the majority of people positively voting for independence at the last TSP elections. People may want more local control of decisions and different policies from those being pursued at Westminster currently, but they don't necessarily want to split the UK.
Those of us with long memories remember the times when the SNP were called "Tartan Tories" as they were seen to represent the moneyed countryside class; then in the early 1980s they were almost universally blamed for helping to bring in Thatcher by their vote against Lib-Lab govt to bring it down in 1979. Their conversion to a "trendy left of centre party" has been electoral opportunism as "New Labour" started to be perceived as being just as in thrall to The City and "Privatise and Pocket the Profit" PFI fat cats as the Tories ever were (and continue to be, as they dismantle schools and hospitals and hand them over to US and home-grown private interests who just happen to be big donors). But the SNP are just as likely to be prone to splits between "modernisers" and "traditionalists" as Labour ever were, when they find it increasingly difficult to maintain populist "left" spending promises. The only thing that keeps discipline is the hunger for power - but then just look at New Labour to see what happens when that power is attained and then fails to deliver the promises.
(24-02-2014 16:11 )Doddle Wrote: (24-02-2014 14:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote: If Cameron had been a Scot himself, as Gordon Brown was as PM, he would have had more credibility in a head to head debate.
Gordon would have been slagged off for staying at Westminster, although ISTR Salmond did just that at first, until the Scots Parliament proved to have staying power (or until the SNP realised nobody else in the party has his publicity-seeking qualities).
We all know these debates are a sham and waste of time ("I agree with Nick") ...and as for Salmond and publicity - well he's the only one from any of the main parties anyone even vaguely recognises, and he knew it. That was why he saw his chance and scuttled back to Scotland, once the Scottish Parliament had been well established and it had become quite clear it was largely a charisma free zone. All the recognisable ones that could potentially jump ship from Westminster to rival him had gone the way of the Dodo - Ming, Charles Kennedy, John Reid; Donald Dewar and Robin Cook died years ago. Alistair Darling for First Minister anyone ? And the other Scottish parties have just made disastrous choices in their leaders recently. There was a TV show where Rory Bremner stopped people on the street with photos of various TSP members (SNP, Labour, Lib Dem, Tory) and nobody could recognise any of them.
Sturgeon is the only other SNP figurehead anybody could name, but doesn't mean she's liked; Swinney will be a well distant third on the recognition scale, and then you'd be lucky if anybody could pick any of the rest of the Scottish Parliament from any party out of a police line-up, or even summon up a plausible name as an answer for a question on "Pointless". Margo MacDonald may be ?
And these are the people to be entrusted with the destiny of a nation if it votes for independence ?