Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread

Author Message
ryuken Offline
Hadouken
*****

Posts: 4,295
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 62
Post: #191
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
Next year we might get asked to pick our 6 nominees from 3 separate categories.
  • Pioneers (Pick two babes that worked between 2002-2009)
  • Legends (Pick two babes that worked between 2010-2017)
  • Daytime (Pick two babes that worked between 2002-2017)
The top 8 that get nominated in those 3 categories would then get seeded in 3 separate groups.

That might be the best format for pioneers like Dionne Mendez, legends like Fernanda Ferrari and daytime icons like Amber James to get inducted into the HOF.
22-12-2021 00:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
crankshaft Offline
Master Debater (though censored)
*****

Posts: 5,569
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 51
Post: #192
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
(21-12-2021 23:51 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  Lasting impression, you've nailed it.
I decent analogy would be the Sex Pistols, 2 & a half years, one album. Undeniably made a lasting impression, voted into the Rock and Roll hall Of Fame, but refused to attend the ceremony, calling the museum "a piss stain".

I dig that. On that basis, I think I should have nominated Kerrie Lee. In my reckoning, she's been the equivalent of the Sex Pistols on the adult channels, with a kind of anarchic spirit (in fact a sex pistol is a good way to describe her). I'll nominate her next year.

||||||||
22-12-2021 00:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
William H Bonney Offline
More sinned against than sinning
*****

Posts: 2,824
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 53
Post: #193
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
(21-12-2021 23:46 )ryuken Wrote:  This year's new HOF seeded group format probably works something like this.

If it worked the way you describe then Charlemagne got all the seedings wrong, because seed #1 should play seed #6 and not seed #4 as shown in your example. Incidentally, the Rear of the Year competition you described 2 pages back also had incorrect seeding, because in the round of 32 there you had seed #1 drawn with seed #25 when it should have been seed #32.
22-12-2021 11:25
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ryuken Offline
Hadouken
*****

Posts: 4,295
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 62
Post: #194
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
(22-12-2021 11:25 )William H Bonney Wrote:  
(21-12-2021 23:46 )ryuken Wrote:  This year's new HOF seeded group format probably works something like this.

If it worked the way you describe then Charlemagne got all the seedings wrong, because seed #1 should play seed #6 and not seed #4 as shown in your example. Incidentally, the Rear of the Year competition you described 2 pages back also had incorrect seeding, because in the round of 32 there you had seed #1 drawn with seed #25 when it should have been seed #32.

It was just a guess that Charlemagne might pick HOF seed #1 vs HOF seed #24.

Then HOF seed #2 vs HOF seed #23, and so on and so forth.

I did #1 vs #64 in the ROTY KO Round, and then #2 vs #63 etc.

In the ROTY group stage I put the #1 to #8 KO round winners in Groups A to H.

Then #9 to #16 second, #17 to #24 third and #25 to #32 fourth

So that's why the #32 KO round winner ended up in Group H, and not Group A.

As I said previously doing ROTY was too time consuming and I'd never do another one.
22-12-2021 13:11
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Charlemagne Offline
Moderator
******

Posts: 65,380
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 218
Post: #195
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
To clear things up, Group A contains the 1st seed and the 6th Seed.
It was more complicated because there were 24 girls.

Don't forget this thread is for enquiries regarding this years contest and for positive ideas and suggestions on how the HOF should progress next year.




.
22-12-2021 15:46
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Charlemagne Offline
Moderator
******

Posts: 65,380
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 218
Post: #196
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
This years award has now been completed.

Thank you to all the members who have nominated and voted.

The new inductees will be announced starting at 9:15pm




.
02-01-2022 21:03
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Olympic Champion Keely
*****

Posts: 53,589
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 281
Post: #197
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
I sense Snooks happiness incoming Big Grin

02-01-2022 21:05
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Charlemagne Offline
Moderator
******

Posts: 65,380
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 218
Post: #198
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
That concluded this session of the Hall of Fame.

As these awards are fluid we welcome any positive suggestions.
There have been some suggestions already which may feature the next time.




.
02-01-2022 21:51
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Olympic Champion Keely
*****

Posts: 53,589
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 281
Post: #199
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
Is the Babe hall of fame on the same road as the forum members one?

If so can Ashley pop round for afternoon tea some time please? Big LaughTongueRolleyes

02-01-2022 21:54
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kingsmind Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 4,456
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 36
Post: #200
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread
Three worthy Hall Of Famers , i haven't been happy with any of the award winners the past two years but the Hall Of Fame seems to always get it right especially this year.

Funniest Poster Runner Up 2019
Premier League Prediction Thread Winner 2020/21
02-01-2022 21:56
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply