"
(22-08-2017 13:17 )Didokan Wrote: (22-08-2017 11:45 )winsaw Wrote: what where 66 up to last night, that had a new girl on i had not seen before who did not get her boobs out at all from what i saw ,
really hope the 66 brain trust has not seen the farce on bs and thought that looks like a good idea lets do it as well
whatever they do they got the calls , right? you should blame the callers!
^ Replace "callers" with users and it's hard not to agree (callers at best get equal billing with cammers these days).
Whatever some of us here may think of the changes that have happened on BS and 66 in recent years, they have been accomplished (the word managed might be a little strong as regards efficient orchestration) whilst (so far) retaining enough custom for survival. More than that, we can also say that the
established changes must have proved more profitable than whatever they were replacing. Also that the paying users have encouraged further moves in the same direction with their financial support of each successful change. All that is pretty sure.
I think it's worth looking at the background of what winsaw broaches in a little detail though. Apologises if some see this as covering old ground but I think it's illustrative of the patterns of these things sometimes... Both main operators have form in 'no boobs out' at night now. 66 began their tease sessions several years back. These seemed to include 'no boobs' whenever the babe in question wished them to. It always threatened to increase in it's prevalance on nights with each babe that provided an upturn in revenue for the slot (i.e. evident by being allowed to continue doing them) with such an approach.
BS are only capitalizing on what 66 brought to the table by establishing that these type sessions could work - at least if they were done at the right time, by the right babe, in the right way. (BS have been looking to what their opponents are doing more than ever before lately.) And, as ever with these things, they are attempting to take it one stage further into more prolonged, later houred, sessions. 66 are unlikely to disagree with such a move or holdfast for anything else when it plays, so neatly, into the whole 'nothing-for-nothing' philosophy which has taken over the entire industry since pervecam monetised the 'visuals-only' content purchase (there is a small interactive element to camming I know).
So, would it really be surprising if both main operators continued to ape each other down this route going forward? It is only really an extension of the unformalised collusion of like-minded thinking that has been going on since the main Ofcom regs marked the end of the visual content free-for-all in late 2010. By this I mean that the operators have gradually learnt how to massage and manage the level of what users expect from their visuals. Bit by bit what could be seen for the price of a call has been eroded. The deminishing number of operators in the industry and the arrival on the whole new focus in pervecam has only accelerated the process; a process that has probably been
the defining trend on the shows over the last six and a half years.
Given the choice, I expect BS and 66 would rather be singing from the same hymn sheet on this and taking turns in broaching new ground with it. This way there is no rouge element provoking the audience into expecting anything different from their shows - especially when the only alternative is the completely timid, anaemic content of Xpanded.
In fact it is lack of competition that is really strangling the shows atm in terms of variety of approach to output. Many insiders will be happy with that IMO.