m100
Banned
Posts: 1,450
Joined: Sep 2008
|
RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion
(24-06-2012 21:32 )elroyticklestab Wrote: No excuse. 2 years ago they set the standard, now they are tamer than my Goldfish George....
oh there's no need to bring george into this - he does what he can within the boundaries forced on him by ofbowl.
would all those wishing to take part in today's round of multiple username bingo please note emails must be submitted before 5pm
|
|
25-06-2012 07:06 |
|
m100
Banned
Posts: 1,450
Joined: Sep 2008
|
RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion
(24-06-2012 21:32 )elroyticklestab Wrote: No excuse. 2 years ago they set the standard, now they are tamer than my Goldfish George....
Will george be getting naked tonight - i'm fed up with paying a fiver just to see him wiggle through that castle thing.
would all those wishing to take part in today's round of multiple username bingo please note emails must be submitted before 5pm
|
|
25-06-2012 20:57 |
|
GTIMKV
Banned
Posts: 210
Joined: Sep 2010
|
RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion
(26-06-2012 00:03 )hairbald Wrote: Well Priya just set an all time high for the "I don't want to be on BSX". Showed nothing (and considering her shows previously this is just weird) and was clearly not enjoying the experience.
Why do babestation keep doing this? I didn't expect Lori to show anything but Priya should have been different. I give up
Didn't watch last nights (no) show, but that kind of thing has happened before with both twins. I've asked Preeti about this and.....
...well it's probably more to do with Geri, Lori and what they are prepared to do when they make their "guest" appearances on Xtreme. And BS "management" of course. Not sure what BS stands for here!
Kinda reminds me of when I started working for a certain retailer in IT support and within a week was told to reduce my level of work because a majority of colleagues couldn't measure up and customers were beginning to question why there was such a difference...
I think it's all about "managing expectations". Can't see how it makes any sense if the actual product or service delivered is actually worse.
Surely it's better to bring everyone else up to a higher standard...
|
|
26-06-2012 12:58 |
|