**Ultimate Babe 2011** - Discussion, suggestions, opinions...

(18-11-2011 14:16 )Scotsman Wrote:  I'd agree that it's been particularly embarassing for you and there's probably an apology in order.

Thanks, as you will see from the explanation from skateguy, it was not a pm but an email,which only 33,000 recieved due to having that box ticked on their cp. I was never made aware that this needed to be checked. It was not possible to pm that many members, so i guess its not your fault. However, this being the case, with so many like myself not recieving the email,it kinda makes the awards null and void. I say, as i did last year also, its far too early to be holding such a vote. Early the next year,even febuary, would be an ideal time.

(18-11-2011 16:31 )stilettos Wrote:  Thanks, as you will see from the explanation from skateguy, it was not a pm but an email,which only 33,000 recieved due to having that box ticked on their cp. I was never made aware that this needed to be checked. It was not possible to pm that many members, so i guess its not your fault.

No, I said in my post (and my PM to you) that it was a PM, not an email. To contact people on a mass basis via PM is considered to be mass-emailing - hence those members who don't want to be contacted by the administrator via email, cannot be sent a mass PM.

That's enough about this subject now. An explanation of why someone (and others) didn't recieve a mass PM has been given and those involved have given their opinions or expressed their dissatisfaction on more than one occasion.

(18-11-2011 16:26 )stilettos Wrote:  It turns out that this was not a 'pm' but an email from scotsman,and only 33,000 members had that function switched on, see post below

It wasn't an email from me, it was a PM from admin.

(18-11-2011 16:31 )stilettos Wrote:  Thanks, as you will see from the explanation from skateguy, it was not a pm but an email,which only 33,000 recieved due to having that box ticked on their cp. I was never made aware that this needed to be checked. It was not possible to pm that many members, so i guess its not your fault. However, this being the case, with so many like myself not recieving the email,it kinda makes the awards null and void. I say, as i did last year also, its far too early to be holding such a vote. Early the next year,even febuary, would be an ideal time.

I think you have misunderstood (again), that wasn't me apologising, that was me saying you should be apologising for your embarassing outburst and accusation that I had 'excluded' you from voting and 'hidden' the voting threads from you, which is obviously preposterous but your epic overreaction were funny, so that's something at least.

As I say, feel free to do your own imitation awards and you can personally contact every member on the forum. Be careful though, if one or two don't vote, it's null and void!!

Can someone also please explain to me why the hell I to have been excluded from this vote???? I have posted at least 4 times on this forum in the past 3 months,surely the most prolific poster there is...... yet I've heard nothing....no pm,no carrier pidgeon,no wired telegraph......nothing????

While I'm on the subject of the forum keeping secrets from me,I've been informed by the voices in my head that all forum members were aware that Father Christmas,the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy are in fact fictional characters.....so why am I only just finding this out,I feel deeply let down by each and every one of you!!!

(19-11-2011 00:07 )cityboy76 Wrote:  Father Christmas,the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy are in fact fictional characters

What..............this better be some sort of sick joke

(19-11-2011 00:07 )cityboy76 Wrote:  While I'm on the subject of the forum keeping secrets from me,I've been informed by the voices in my head that all forum members were aware that Father Christmas,the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy are in fact fictional characters.....so why am I only just finding this out,I feel deeply let down by each and every one of you!!!

Well if Manchester City can be top of the Premier League, then I suppose ANYTHING's possible

Back on topic, I hope you're gonna be sticking around long enough to vote in the Daytime comp It should be starting pretty soon

I know this was a while ago Scotsman, but what was the difference in vote numbers between Dannii and Georgie in the 1st Knockout stage?

28 votes by my count.

Is the semi the same four girls from last year?

(19-11-2011 19:01 )gazfc Wrote:  Is the semi the same four girls from last year?

2010 last 4
caty cole (winner)
daryl morgan (runner up)
tiffany chambers
tori lee