Bunna
On Leave
Posts: 1,722
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 70
|
RE: Members that Don't post etc
There are so many threads in the forum that I probably look at about 10% of them,personally I don't have time to look at all of them,since I have started capping, alot of the old threads I used to look at I don't get time to view anymore,I started capping to give something back to the forum and I know it is appreciated by regulars who show that appreciation with the thanks button,sometimes when you see just 1 or 2 thanks you wonder if the model is even watched or liked by other members and if you should bother continuing capping that model,however as I stated earlier some members may not view that thread/or haven't got around to viewing that thread yet,or may wish to remain anonymous and that is entirely up to them.
I think in postings where videos,caps & photos are used, the use of the thanks button is a good way of letting the poster know you wish them to continue doing what they do.
BTW I can't even keep up with the names of all the models let alone the regular forum members and 20,000 unknowns tintin wants to flood the forum with
Thank you and goodnight!
|
|
03-11-2009 11:05 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Members that Don't post etc
I haven't read through all the replies, but here's my view. I don't mind lurkers in the slightest. As Stilettos hinted at, 20,000+ active posters would mean this place would grind to a halt - the server couldn't handle it. And none of us want that, do we?
(This post was last modified: 04-11-2009 19:44 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
04-11-2009 19:43 |
|
stilettos
Pornemouth beach
Posts: 2,117
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 90
|
RE: Members that Don't post etc
(04-11-2009 19:43 )StanTheMan Wrote: As Stilettos hinted at, 20,000+ active posters would mean this place would grind to a halt - the server couldn't handle it. And none of us want that, do we?
I didnt actually say that,, "Perrish the thought we get 20,000 guys posting caps of their top girls, we'd never get thru it either! " so what i meant was it would 'clog up' the system with so many similar caps n vids requiring then,some kind of vetting to avoid doubles,or just poor quality webstream posts.
High-Heels,Low Morals!
(This post was last modified: 04-11-2009 21:54 by stilettos.)
|
|
04-11-2009 21:53 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: Members that Don't post etc
(04-11-2009 21:12 )admin Wrote: (04-11-2009 19:43 )StanTheMan Wrote: As Stilettos hinted at, 20,000+ active posters would mean this place would grind to a halt - the server couldn't handle it. And none of us want that, do we?
This is complete nonsense. Load on the server is primarily caused by people loading threads to read them, not by them posting. 5 times the posters we have now would not impact the server load that much. It would have to be much more than that before there was a problem.
Do forgive me! I feel such a clot I might just go outside and shoot myself.
|
|
04-11-2009 21:56 |
|