ivorthckeshaft
Banned
Posts: 45
Joined: Jan 2009
|
RE: One dull, all dull
I seriously hope not. I had lost interest in the late night channels and started reading again (shock horror) 'til Bailey, Amanda et al raised the bar but if it is back to armour plated knickers I will once again resume my early nights with a cocoa and PG Wodehouse!
|
|
04-12-2009 19:31 |
|
Serena
Junior Poster
Posts: 41
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 12
|
RE: One dull, all dull
It is a confusing for us ladies as it is for you.
A couple of weeks ago I was allowed to (suddenly) show my bush and sit naked (polite pose!). Then suddenly it goes back to the OLD rules - big knickers and no hair.
I have never bought so many pairs of knickers in all my life - to suit different guidelines.
No one seems to know exactly why the rules go UP and DOWN.
One VERY IMPORTANT THING ...
Whatever the 'visual' rules are, the conversational rules are always very free and easy. If you are just viewing you may well be disappointed when things seem to change. However, if you are a listener/caller, the level of explicit and entertaining conversation has always remained the same. There are no UPS and DOWNS with the conversation. At least THAT remains constant!
|
|
04-12-2009 23:29 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: One dull, all dull
(04-12-2009 23:29 )Serena/Hazel(May) Wrote: If you are just viewing you may well be disappointed when things seem to change. However, if you are a listener/caller, the level of explicit and entertaining conversation has always remained the same.
I know this isn't your fault, Serena, so this isn't aimed at you, but there are many who get no enjoyment from calling a girl to talk dirty. It doesn't appeal to me in the slightest. What I see on screen, however, does have lots of appeal. Looks like the 'window shoppers' amongst us are going to have to like it or lump it
(This post was last modified: 04-12-2009 23:53 by StanTheMan.)
|
|
04-12-2009 23:52 |
|
StanTheMan
Banned
Posts: 3,790
Joined: May 2009
|
RE: One dull, all dull
(04-12-2009 19:31 )ivorthckeshaft Wrote: I seriously hope not. I had lost interest in the late night channels and started reading again (shock horror) 'til Bailey, Amanda et al raised the bar but if it is back to armour plated knickers I will once again resume my early nights with a cocoa and PG Wodehouse!
That post made me smile, ivor, mainly because it reflects my own habits perfectly. I'm kind of looking forward to getting my life back and turning in at a decnt time with a good book. Not Woodhouse, though
|
|
04-12-2009 23:55 |
|