30000 Members and Counting

Just a small observation,apparently this forum has over 30,000 members,and yet most days i see the usual 20 or so posters,and always the same ones thanking each other,just wondered are we the sad ones,and what are the rest doing,mind you good job 30,000 dont thank would probally go into meltdown.

(26-04-2010 18:03 )bombshell Wrote:  Just a small observation,apparently this forum has over 30,000 members,and yet most days i see the usual 20 or so posters,and always the same ones thanking each other,just wondered are we the sad ones,and what are the rest doing,mind you good job 30,000 dont thank would probally go into meltdown.

The rest are guests or members who don't bother to post, or thank members for their posts, they just leech off the vids that are posted here for free, so when you think of it, they are the sad ones, not us.

(26-04-2010 18:12 )Josh187 Wrote:  

(26-04-2010 18:03 )bombshell Wrote:  Just a small observation,apparently this forum has over 30,000 members,and yet most days i see the usual 20 or so posters,and always the same ones thanking each other,just wondered are we the sad ones,and what are the rest doing,mind you good job 30,000 dont thank would probally go into meltdown.

The rest are guests or members who don't bother to post, or thank members for their posts, they just leech off the vids that are posted here for free, so when you think of it, they are the sad ones, not us.

Exactly, couldn't agree more.

To be honest, I can't see the reason in becoming a member of a forum, unless you intend to contribute in some way. Why decide to become a member, if all your going to do is the same thing you did as a guest. And that's see how many freebies you can get.

I think if a member hasn't contributed to the forum for say a 3 month period, his membership should be deleted.

i agree. (does this post count as a contribution?)

(27-04-2010 12:39 )aceman65 Wrote:  I think if a member hasn't contributed to the forum for say a 3 month period, his membership should be deleted.

That would mean banning about 99% of the babes who are members here. How would they pimp their websites?

(27-04-2010 15:13 )Sm© Wrote:  

(27-04-2010 12:39 )aceman65 Wrote:  I think if a member hasn't contributed to the forum for say a 3 month period, his membership should be deleted.

That would mean banning about 99% of the babes who are members here. How would they pimp their websites?

There are babes who are members of here?

And they have websites?!?!?!?!??

This was kept quiet from me..............

What about starting with banning anyone who is found to have multiple accounts

those mulitple account posters do need to be banned, and it doesnt take a ralph wiggum to work out whom they are.

(27-04-2010 15:13 )Sm© Wrote:  

(27-04-2010 12:39 )aceman65 Wrote:  I think if a member hasn't contributed to the forum for say a 3 month period, his membership should be deleted.

That would mean banning about 99% of the babes who are members here. How would they pimp their websites?

Good point, but I think the babes could be made exempt from such a rule, as there the reason for this forum in the first place. but even they can still view the forum as a guest.

Actually - the channels are the reason the forum exists.....babes come and go

And us regular members are more important than the babes - as without us there'd be no reason to keep the forum going as it would be dead



*not that I'm saying the babes are unimportant