I'm with Trevor and Scotsman on this one.
I know the rules are different during the day, but if Dani T and Tiffany can get away with dancing on the Pad last weekend, then surely the others can too. This is one of the reasons I like Tiff so much - she's got the moves. OK, she wouldn't be much of a lap dancer otherwise, but at least she's fun to watch. I swear I've never wanted to swap places with a sofa so badly - lol. Kelly's been known to jump/bounce around too.
No matter how pretty/horny she might be, if a girl is just going to lie there doing precious little and the only available camera's locked-off to a single position, it's going to to make boring TV. Under such circumstances, the punters will be less likely to part with large quantities of their hard-earned for a chat, and far more likely to channel-hop. Don't get me wrong, if you've heard the off-stage chat on SC's video upload (post
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=3531), it must be a thankless job for the girls. So maybe it's unfair of us to make such demands of them - even if this what they've chosen to do for a living.
My other gripe - I know it's been said before, but all these channels really need to sort out their websites. IMHO, the worst offenders are:-
http://www.earlybird.tv, which points to a competely unrelated American multimedia production company.
http://www.thepad.tv is just a "coming soon" page with a link to the BangBabes site.
http://www.bangbabes.tv has a structure and a single live feed on the home page (wow!), but its content has remained steadfastly and woefully incomplete.
At least the CellCast channel websites are completely populated (as far as I can tell without subscribing), even if it seems like their website designer used the same template for all of them. I'm sure CellCast would say this is their chosen "corporate look". The TV claims of daily content updates are grossly exaggerated, though.
As I see it, the bottom line is that all these companies are in business to make money - and there's nothing necessarily wrong with that. What IS wrong is their tendency to treat their punters like mushrooms ("keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em bullsh*t"). As long as this attitude persists, such companies are doomed to fail.
OK - rant's over. Now I'll answer the original question. What's Missing? - I answer it in two words: integrity and professionalism. The girls need to be completely comfortable with what they're doing, the technical crews need to be more imaginative, and websites should be kept up-to-date.