ChatGirl - Chat & Discussion

(02-01-2012 00:29 )aceman65 Wrote:  Typical. I have a discussion with steve & skateguy about this section being restored. And get told to put all my recordings into storage. Which I have just done by zipping them and putting them on disc. And Admin goes a restores the section.

Well your going to have to wait for an update from me. As I can't be arsed to unpack what I just packed. But I'll get around to it eventually.

Spanner in the works for the first day of the new year. Bodes well doesn't it.

Admin did this? i thought because i tried to make a new hread in this area i caused it by accident

Yes, only Admin can restore threads that have been removed.

Anyone have any Info on weather or not ChatGirl TV will be returning to full nights ?

you and me both, would love to know. i almost
can't remember what chatgirl was like on an all night show.
it can't go on for long tough, it doesn't start broadcasting
full nightshows soon it will cease broadcasting. a 6am
to 10pm show simply can't generate enough money to stay on the air
and pay the girls on top of that. plus one or two departures recently
they don't have enough girls on the channel, so all that will eventually
crumble and no chatgirl. i give it 6 months tops maybe, hopefully i'm
wrong tough.

I'm not entirely sure why a chatgirl forum in this section exists. We have one in the dayshows section, and that's surely the only one that's relevant at the moment??

Firstly it is great to see Lucy Alexander back on TV and she's been looking fantastic this evening.

But the major problem is the combination of the big on screen graphics and the camerawork.
The large text box on the right side is very wide and comes into the screen a lot, and has been covering up Lucy's bum during most of the tease hour - bad news!

The graphics which cover the bottom 1/4 of the screen have also been getting in the way a lot.

The cameraman doesn't seem to be adjusting the shot for these graphics at all - for ages Lucy was kneeling on that chair during the tease hour, but her legs and bum were completely hidden behind the graphics.

Why can't the cameramen account for these large graphics? Maybe they could try to imagine the bottom 1/4 of their camera monitor is covered in graphics and a large wide text box is encroaching into the centre of the screen?

What's the point of having a gorgeous model like Lucy doing some very sexy poses if you can hardly see her body?

Why not just put a fucking telephone number or text section along the bottom of the screen, without a thick black box with poxy pictures etc in it!! If the web stream can do this why can't the TV ? Also babestation had a scrolling text box and or at the bottom of the screen a long time ago, and its not as if we all want to hear what texter is saying im sure the viewer of the text sent would be happy to see the sent text scrolling across the bottom of the screen ??

Money must be tight at Chatgirls.
They have all their numbers hand written on one sheet of A4 paper.

But it leaves lots of screen to see the babe
I hope that it will catch on at Babestation.

I'm not sure what screen you are looking at - is it the same screen with large graphics in the bottom quarter, a very wide text box on the right hand side, which almost comes into the middle of the screen, and cameramen who often don't adjust the shot to take these things into account?

is it me or have the girls stopped bending over infront of the camera and stopped shaking there ass on the naughty hour ... kimberley j used to show it off all the time now it seems like shes restricted EVEN more?