Rake
Tipping for nips and panties
Posts: 2,518
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 43
|
RE: S66 new website launch
(17-02-2022 19:46 )generator60 Wrote: Has the picture quality improved?
Good question and one I answered for myself earlier this evening by flicking between S66 and Babestation. In essence:
Yes it has improved on average but still significanlty behind BS and is patchy.
BS livestreams immediately 'pop' with clarity, sharpness, correct white balance and better lighting.
S66 still have the age-old problems:
- incorrect white balance - too many sets and shows have yellowy-orange-beige tungsten colour cast ruining contrast and skin tones
- lighting tend to be either gloomy and shadowy or the highlights are blown
- resolution is unstable and looks to wander from 1080 downwards depending on number of babes on and number of users online
- As docutech says, pervert cameras dogged by shocking resolution, and furthermore the subject (crotch or arse usually!) often backlit by main cam dominant keylight, so babe in silhouette and crotch in gloomy shadow. My domestic webcam is a Logitech Brio 4k - why aren't S66, a supposedly professional broadcasting company, able to get theirs operating at full capability?
- Babes oblivious to these technical and cinematographic issues and even if they are made aware, don't seem to have the technical knowledge to resolve them on the fly mid-show, nor enjoy the production support on hand to resolve them. The producers must be disinterested in optimising the sets and lighting for each show or don't understand themselves! A few minutes effort on set and on the software for each babe would transform the quality of the visual output.
(This post was last modified: 18-02-2022 22:53 by Rake.)
|
|
18-02-2022 22:47 |
|
generator60
Senior Poster
Posts: 455
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 6
|
RE: S66 new website launch
(18-02-2022 22:47 )Rake Wrote: (17-02-2022 19:46 )generator60 Wrote: Has the picture quality improved?
Good question and one I answered for myself earlier this evening by flicking between S66 and Babestation. In essence:
Yes it has improved on average but still significanlty behind BS and is patchy.
BS livestreams immediately 'pop' with clarity, sharpness, correct white balance and better lighting.
S66 still have the age-old problems:
- incorrect white balance - too many sets and shows have yellowy-orange-beige tungsten colour cast ruining contrast and skin tones
- lighting tend to be either gloomy and shadowy or the highlights are blown
- resolution is unstable and looks to wander from 1080 downwards depending on number of babes on and number of users online
- As docutech says, pervert cameras dogged by shocking resolution, and furthermore the subject (crotch or arse usually!) often backlit by main cam dominant keylight, so babe in silhouette and crotch in gloomy shadow. My domestic webcam is a Logitech Brio 4k - why aren't S66, a supposedly professional broadcasting company, able to get theirs operating at full capability?
- Babes oblivious to these technical and cinematographic issues and even if they are made aware, don't seem to have the technical knowledge to resolve them on the fly mid-show, nor enjoy the production support on hand to resolve them. The producers must be disinterested in optimising the sets and lighting for each show or don't understand themselves! A few minutes effort on set and on the software for each babe would transform the quality of the visual output.
Thanks for your reply Rake that was just what I wanted to know.
I'll keep with CB I can't believe I put up with s66 for so long.
There were a couple of presenters I thought I would miss but not any more.
Cheers
|
|
18-02-2022 23:39 |
|
HannahsPet
Posting Machine
Posts: 21,620
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 166
|
RE: S66 new website launch
True Supporter of Girls and Not Channels !!!!!
I always Keep getting accused of thinking the world revolves around me. . i know it doesnt . . it revolves around the sun which shines out of my arse !!!!!
|
|
11-03-2022 11:08 |
|