Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread

(19-09-2021 16:23 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Once the channels adopted a non-regulated platform (the net) as their main source of income, the TV feed's days were numbered - as unfortunately were the days of babes who don't do content above TV levels. When you allow the unfettered market to dominate, the drift towards harder content was always going to be inevitable as demand will dictate the shows' general content. Mainstream customer demand (the majority...) will always want harder content as the general feature; so...

Ofcom's regs created the shows are we came to know them. Remove the regs and the shows were never going to be able to hold out indefinitely as they were. Change was always going to be gradual but unfortunately, also, inevitable and irreversible (unless new regs come in online - not an impossible occurrence by any means).

Sadly I think those are valid points! I wonder just how we got to the point where the available audience were enticed to watch/participate in shows with such content as the norm (mainstream as you call it)?? Seen one seen them all would be my view!!

Surely there is a sufficient market for the tease, seductive arousing content to allow those presenters left out in the cold, to :quote: ( find a home ). If even these perameters are deemed a step too far for some. there still is the girlfriend experience pov route. Both markets as yet untapped as far as I can see!!

(19-09-2021 17:04 )hornball Wrote:  I wonder just how we got to the point where the available audience were enticed to watch/participate in shows with such content as the norm (mainstream as you call it)?? Seen one seen them all would be my view!!

I agree in part. Far too much generic, cropped and exposed, erogenous zones funding the shows still. Far too little of the babe's personalities and sensualities backing such material. But we got here partly because 'we' demanded it (or at least accepted it in enough quantity when offered it - note it took until sufficent tech was widespread enough for it to impact properly). It's hard to use logic against what other guys clearly want and are paying for en masse - particularly when the shows are so keen to let one customer fend off another by simply out spending them in the moment. You basically end up asking insiders not to be so bloody craven and short-termist. Good luck winning on that one! (Although I'll probably still be here, pissing in the wind, saying that is indeed the case with you!)

(19-09-2021 17:04 )hornball Wrote:  Surely their is a sufficient market for the tease,seductive arousing content to allow those presenters left out in the cold, to :quote: ( find a home ). If even thee perameters are deemed a step too far for some. there still is the girlfriend experience pov route. Both markets as yet untapped as far as I can see!!

Maybe; maybe not. I was foregoing naunce to provide a concise generalised pic above... What there definitely is a big enough market for is intimate, personality based, virtual interactions with hot women. But this can mean all things to all sorts. Emotional connection on some level is certainly preferable to the vast majority of punters. And one of those levels is, for sure, the gfe. Some of them involve teasy, seductive, non-explicit visual material. But it often progresses to the explicit there too...

That's the thing about the shows - what is/will be financially viable, beyond individual babes, is hard to say as she and each babe is getting support from an infrastructure maintained by other things. For instance, diminish the take provided by one fan group and another has to make up the shortfall. (If callers are lost because babes are distracted by pervcammers the industry needs to make bloody sure those pervcammers keep coming back in future. At least until its monies can be replaced by that of the next tech saviour! Same with private obsessed johnnies coming to the fore atm.)

At its heart, what the shows sell is access, and ongoing connections, to a babe's attentions (whatever that may entail on each occassion); whatever the fantasy that attention can promote in the punter. Like you say you'd hope if the babe's attentions are expressed well enough there'd be sufficent market for them no matter what form their representation takes. The central point I was making above was the more the harder content predominates, the more difficult it is for a babe to buck that trend because of the simple expectations wrought by the content going on about her.

An example: In late 2015 Evelyn was holding out against the successful arrival of (non-regulated) pervcam to the shows. January 2016 she gave in to the pull, became its clear most successful exponent at 66, and look at her content levels now. But even so there's a massive personality component to what prompts the spending of her, yes, small band of (frankly) obsessive and accepting fans. And only the occasional nip on main cam from her even now! So it's evident a babe should be able to keep explicit visuals off main cam at least, should see wish. There are still several ways to skin the cat even when near everyone is doing 'hardcore' in some form.

And so it goes on!! Loving spending time in the loving arms of......er the promo vids while backstage................. - not as full as usual, has Dolce etc. I get it more money but...........(I wish there was a sleep/yawn emoji)

Eventually and belatedly Ana appeared to make things better. Too late too little!! Even she must be wondering what the future holds??

I'm wondering if 66 management are already going back on their stupid new rules. Since they came in I've been wondering what it would mean for Anna Arris, who should be most effected by these rules (as a Saturday tv girl - no 66chat at weekends)...

But she had webcam on (was also taking pvt's), while on tv and had two phones in her hand...

Did Annie just put her foot down

I’d have thought that Anna had it easier than the others, as she has always resisted doing the naughty chat in any circumstances. If the main rule change is that you cannot do naughty calls in the daytime — even off the web number — then it shouldn’t have affected her much at all, as she wasn’t doing them anyway.

^^ To all the above : Even the tease 9 - 10 went south!! Maybe didn't meet the tip goals?? Ana seemed to acknowledge when that happened with a gesture to screen. Unless I am over reading!! Either way S66 is better with than without her, but it will become - I imagine - more of a frustration if she finds it is her or bust!! If S66 was to be transparent, and explain the change in the daytime schedule, it would help!! How long can Evski/Rhiannon hold the day S66 together for example?? again, when they don't do it, more often than not it goes 'dark'

I hope that the schedule that has Ana Harris doing cams once again is wrong!! Why?? because it may mean we have seen the last of her on the tv like all the rest!! Don't think she would sell out like that though

I haven't seen the schedule, but Anna is only in the studio on Saturdays... Sundays and Wednesdays are usually cam from home.

Chloe has been eating a buffet on TV for the past hour....what is this actually achieving for the channel ?...to think I used to enjoy coming home early or booked a half day from the office to spend good money speaking to a fav girl on the channel in the afternoons ......